I guess Daniel has already reverted the patches.
Now many I know who is going to define on what should be the right way
to handle aspect ratios ?
Regards
Shashank
On 11/15/2016 7:48 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 01:48:04PM +, Jose Abreu wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>>
>> On 15-
Regards
Shashank
On 11/15/2016 7:48 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 01:48:04PM +, Jose Abreu wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>>
>> On 15-11-2016 10:52, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 03:36:02PM +0530, Sharma, Shashank wrote:
On 11/15/2016 3:30 PM, Daniel Vetter w
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 08:40:01PM +0530, Sharma, Shashank wrote:
> Regards
> Shashank
> On 11/15/2016 7:48 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 01:48:04PM +, Jose Abreu wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 15-11-2016 10:52, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 09:18:03AM -0500, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 9:03 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 03:54:42PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> >> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:00:04AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 02:30:47PM +
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 01:48:04PM +, Jose Abreu wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> On 15-11-2016 10:52, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 03:36:02PM +0530, Sharma, Shashank wrote:
> >> On 11/15/2016 3:30 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 02:30:47PM +0530, Sharma, Shash
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:00:04AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 02:30:47PM +0530, Sharma, Shashank wrote:
> > On 11/15/2016 2:21 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 10:26:08PM +0530, Sharma, Shashank wrote:
> > > > In any case, I guess addition of a cap f
Regards
Shashank
On 11/15/2016 3:30 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 02:30:47PM +0530, Sharma, Shashank wrote:
>> On 11/15/2016 2:21 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 10:26:08PM +0530, Sharma, Shashank wrote:
In any case, I guess addition of a cap for as
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 09:18:03AM -0500, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 9:03 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 03:54:42PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> >> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:00:04AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 02:30:47PM +
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 03:54:42PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:00:04AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 02:30:47PM +0530, Sharma, Shashank wrote:
> > > On 11/15/2016 2:21 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 10:26:08PM +0530,
Regards
Shashank
On 11/15/2016 2:21 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 10:26:08PM +0530, Sharma, Shashank wrote:
>> On 11/14/2016 10:15 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 10:12:04PM +0530, Sharma, Shashank wrote:
Regards
Shashank
Hi,
On 15-11-2016 10:52, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 03:36:02PM +0530, Sharma, Shashank wrote:
>> On 11/15/2016 3:30 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 02:30:47PM +0530, Sharma, Shashank wrote:
On 11/15/2016 2:21 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, No
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 03:36:02PM +0530, Sharma, Shashank wrote:
> On 11/15/2016 3:30 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 02:30:47PM +0530, Sharma, Shashank wrote:
> > > On 11/15/2016 2:21 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 10:26:08PM +0530, Sharma, Shashank
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 02:30:47PM +0530, Sharma, Shashank wrote:
> On 11/15/2016 2:21 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 10:26:08PM +0530, Sharma, Shashank wrote:
> > > In any case, I guess addition of a cap for aspect ratio should fix the
> > > current objections for this implem
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 9:26 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 09:18:03AM -0500, Alex Deucher wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 9:03 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> > On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 03:54:42PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
>> >> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:00:04AM +0100, Dani
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 10:26:08PM +0530, Sharma, Shashank wrote:
> On 11/14/2016 10:15 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 10:12:04PM +0530, Sharma, Shashank wrote:
> > > Regards
> > >
> > > Shashank
> > >
> > >
> > > On 11/14/2016 9:50 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > > > On M
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 9:03 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 03:54:42PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:00:04AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> > On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 02:30:47PM +0530, Sharma, Shashank wrote:
>> > > On 11/15/2016 2:21 PM, Daniel Vet
On 11/14/2016 10:15 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 10:12:04PM +0530, Sharma, Shashank wrote:
>> Regards
>>
>> Shashank
>>
>>
>> On 11/14/2016 9:50 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 09:37:18PM +0530, Sharma, Shashank wrote:
Regards
Shashank
>
Regards
Shashank
On 11/14/2016 9:50 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 09:37:18PM +0530, Sharma, Shashank wrote:
>> Regards
>>
>> Shashank
>>
>>
>> On 11/14/2016 9:19 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 08:14:34PM +0530, Sharma, Shashank wrote:
Regards
>
Regards
Shashank
On 11/14/2016 9:19 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 08:14:34PM +0530, Sharma, Shashank wrote:
>> Regards
>> Shashank
>>> the revert:
>>>
>>>HDMI2 connected 1920x1080+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis)
>>> 700mm x 390mm
>>> - 1920x1080 6
Regards
Shashank
> the revert:
>
> HDMI2 connected 1920x1080+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis)
> 700mm x 390mm
> - 1920x1080 60.00*+
> - 1920x1080i60.0050.00
> + 1920x1080 60.00*+ 50.0059.9430.0025.0024.0029.97
>23.98
> + 1920x1080i
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 10:12:04PM +0530, Sharma, Shashank wrote:
> Regards
>
> Shashank
>
>
> On 11/14/2016 9:50 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 09:37:18PM +0530, Sharma, Shashank wrote:
> >> Regards
> >>
> >> Shashank
> >>
> >>
> >> On 11/14/2016 9:19 PM, Ville Syrjälä
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 09:37:18PM +0530, Sharma, Shashank wrote:
> Regards
>
> Shashank
>
>
> On 11/14/2016 9:19 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 08:14:34PM +0530, Sharma, Shashank wrote:
> >> Regards
> >> Shashank
> >>> the revert:
> >>>
> >>>HDMI2 connected 1920x1080
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 08:14:34PM +0530, Sharma, Shashank wrote:
> Regards
> Shashank
> > the revert:
> >
> > HDMI2 connected 1920x1080+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis)
> > 700mm x 390mm
> > - 1920x1080 60.00*+
> > - 1920x1080i60.0050.00
> > + 1920x1080 60.00
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 12:07:29PM -0500, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 12:00 PM, Ville Syrjälä
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 02:31:43PM +0200, ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
> > wrote:
> >> From: Ville Syrjälä
> >>
> >> This reverts commit a68362fe3e84fcbedd49939aa2
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 07:00:17PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 02:31:43PM +0200, ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
> wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä
> >
> > This reverts commit a68362fe3e84fcbedd49939aa200519aa5410135.
> >
> > Adding new mode flags willy nilly breaks
On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 02:31:43PM +0200, ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä
>
> This reverts commit a68362fe3e84fcbedd49939aa200519aa5410135.
>
> Adding new mode flags willy nilly breaks existing userspace. We need to
> coordinate this better, potentially with a ne
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 6:07 PM, Alex Deucher wrote:
>> This was with sna, which does this:
>> #define KNOWN_MODE_FLAGS ((1<<14)-1)
>> if (mode->status == MODE_OK && kmode->flags & ~KNOWN_MODE_FLAGS)
>> mode->status = MODE_BAD; /* unknown flags => unhandled */
>> so all the modes with an
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 12:00 PM, Ville Syrjälä
wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 02:31:43PM +0200, ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
> wrote:
>> From: Ville Syrjälä
>>
>> This reverts commit a68362fe3e84fcbedd49939aa200519aa5410135.
>>
>> Adding new mode flags willy nilly breaks existing user
Regards
Shashank
On 11/7/2016 8:56 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 7 November 2016 at 07:43, Sharma, Shashank
> wrote:
>> If I was not very clear for the first time, every time we send a patch to
>> drm-intel/dri-devel, we do basic testing on Gnome-desktop too (Not only
>> Android).
>>
>> So even
On 7 November 2016 at 15:48, Sharma, Shashank
wrote:
> Regards
>
> Shashank
>
>
> On 11/7/2016 8:56 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
>>
>> On 7 November 2016 at 07:43, Sharma, Shashank
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> If I was not very clear for the first time, every time we send a patch to
>>> drm-intel/dri-devel, we
On 7 November 2016 at 07:43, Sharma, Shashank
wrote:
> If I was not very clear for the first time, every time we send a patch to
> drm-intel/dri-devel, we do basic testing on Gnome-desktop too (Not only
> Android).
>
> So even these aspect ratio patches were tested with full gnome-desktop, and
>
If I was not very clear for the first time, every time we send a patch
to drm-intel/dri-devel, we do basic testing on Gnome-desktop too (Not
only Android).
So even these aspect ratio patches were tested with full gnome-desktop,
and it worked well.
Regards
Shashank
On 11/3/2016 9:49 PM, Sharma
On 11/3/2016 9:33 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 2:49 PM, Ville Syrjälä
> wrote:
>>> If you still think you should send this revert, I am removing my NACK.
>>> Pls Go ahead.
>> The other option is to not revert and instead slap a fix on top. But
>> that would have to be done
t test with normal userspace as well. That has a long
> history and so any ABI/behaviour change is actually a big deal.
>
>>>>
>>>> NACK until we get to the right reason.
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> Shashank
>>>> -----Origina
t reason.
My nack continues.
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> Shashank
>>>> -Original Message-
>>>> From: ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com [mailto:ville.syrjala at
>>>> linux.intel.com]
>>>> Sent: Thursday, November
On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 2:49 PM, Ville Syrjälä
wrote:
>> If you still think you should send this revert, I am removing my NACK.
>> Pls Go ahead.
>
> The other option is to not revert and instead slap a fix on top. But
> that would have to be done reasonably quickly so that the thing is
> ready in
com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 3, 2016 6:02 PM
> To: dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Sharma, Shashank ; Lin; Jia, Lin A
> ; Sharma, Akashdeep ;
> Jim Bride ; Jose Abreu synopsys.com>; Daniel Vetter ; Emil Velikov
>
> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Revert "drm: Add and h
rspace as well. That has a long
> > history and so any ABI/behaviour change is actually a big deal.
> >
> >>>>
> >>>> NACK until we get to the right reason.
> >>>>
> >>>> Regards
> >>>> Shashank
> >>>&g
essage-
> >> From: ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com [mailto:ville.syrjala at
> >> linux.intel.com]
> >> Sent: Thursday, November 3, 2016 6:02 PM
> >> To: dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> >> Cc: Sharma, Shashank ; Lin; Jia, Lin A
> >> ; Sharma
t; > > linux.intel.com]
> > > Sent: Thursday, November 3, 2016 6:02 PM
> > > To: dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> > > Cc: Sharma, Shashank ; Lin; Jia, Lin A
> > > ; Sharma, Akashdeep > > intel.com>; Jim Bride ; Jose Abreu
> >
6:02 PM
> > To: dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> > Cc: Sharma, Shashank ; Lin; Jia, Lin A
> > ; Sharma, Akashdeep > intel.com>; Jim Bride ; Jose Abreu
> > ; Daniel Vetter ;
> > Emil Velikov
> > Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Revert "drm: Add and handle ne
From: Ville Syrjälä
This reverts commit a68362fe3e84fcbedd49939aa200519aa5410135.
Adding new mode flags willy nilly breaks existing userspace. We need to
coordinate this better, potentially with a new client cap that only
exposes the aspect ratio flags when userspace is prepared for them
(simi
42 matches
Mail list logo
