If I was not very clear for the first time, every time we send a patch to drm-intel/dri-devel, we do basic testing on Gnome-desktop too (Not only Android).
So even these aspect ratio patches were tested with full gnome-desktop, and it worked well. Regards Shashank On 11/3/2016 9:49 PM, Sharma, Shashank wrote: > > > On 11/3/2016 9:33 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 2:49 PM, Ville Syrjälä >> <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> wrote: >>>> If you still think you should send this revert, I am removing my NACK. >>>> Pls Go ahead. >>> The other option is to not revert and instead slap a fix on top. But >>> that would have to be done reasonably quickly so that the thing is >>> ready in time for 4.10. We're closing in on 4.9-rc4 now so I guess >>> we should still have a few weeks to fix things up. Whether that's >>> enough I don't know. If not, then we should revert. >> 1 week and then revert is the guideline. Please don't bend the rules >> for regressions all the time, it makes things painful for everyone >> else. >> -Daniel > I don't remember breaking it for first time itself. > As I mentioned in the other thread, please add the regression details. > After that, revert it if you want (I saw you have already given > maintainers-ack) > > Regards > Shashank >