Regards Shashank
On 11/15/2016 3:30 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 02:30:47PM +0530, Sharma, Shashank wrote: >> On 11/15/2016 2:21 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: >>> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 10:26:08PM +0530, Sharma, Shashank wrote: >>>> In any case, I guess addition of a cap for aspect ratio should fix the >>>> current objections for this implementation. >>>> >>>> And I will keep it 0 by default, so that no aspect ratio information is >>>> added until userspace sets the cap to 1 on its own. >>> Note that cap = needs new userspace. >>> -Daniel >> I guess you mean a new libdrm, so yes, I will add this new cap in libdrm. >> Is that what you mean ? > Full stack solution, including enabling in an Xorg driver (or somewhere > else, we also have drm_hwcomposer as an option). > > And because that's probably going to take forever I'm leaning towards > revert again. Ville? Not really, with a kernel cap implementation, the code will be as it was before this patch series ( as good as revert ) And then when we want to enable it, we can add the corresponding Xserver patch. I guess the current problem is if is breaks something in some userspace, but if I am loading the flags only when the cap is set, we should be good. Regards Shashank > -Daniel
