The issue has been solved in the IRC chat.
I'm using fs Layout for mail_location:
# mail_location = maildir:~/mail:LAYOUT=fs
but I didn't use it in the shared namespace
# location = maildir:%%h/mail:INDEX=~/shared_mailboxes/%%n
So dovecot searched for mailboxes in maildir++ layout (e.g. user/.Sha
Hello,
I'm using Dovecot 2.3.19.1 and Pigeonhole 0.5.19 on Debian 12.1 and I'm
trying to use sieve extensions vacation and redirect but I'm having
issues because of the creation of file /home/USER/.dovecot.lda-dupes and
dir /home/USER/.dovecot.lda-dupes.locks
The error in logs is pretty clea
Dovecot expects mail user's home to be writable. If your home is not
writable by the user, you need to set mail_home=~/mail/ or something
and make that directory writable to dovecot, e.g. with chown.
Aki
Hello Aki,
I tried to change mail_home to several options (I've restarted dovecot
afte
I'm guessing your userdb or passdb is returning home for user, so you
need to fix that to point to correct place, or drop it.
Aki
You are right, I found it in /etc/exim4/domains/%d/passwd
passdb {
driver = passwd-file
args = scheme=MD5-CRYPT username_format=%n
/etc/exim4/domains/%d/pass
Exploring the possible use of SSO using OIDC with Dovecot. Trying to understand
the functionality of OIDC as it pertains to e-mail clients like Thunderbird,
Outlook etc...
My OIDC provider will authenticate a user by intercepting the connection
attempt to the resource, present a login screen an
Quick Q: Can dovecot use wildcard TLS Certificates?
I'm having issues with a new dovecot/postfix stack set-up and I can't get mutt
on the local box to connect via imap - its coming back with an SSL error, and
as I'm using a wildcard cert for the domain I was wondering if that was my
issue.
If
On 10/14/23 03:26, Laura Smith via dovecot wrote:
> FUD ?
>
> I knew someone would accuse me of that which is why I linked to the video
> from the horse's mouth, I transcribe what the speaker said:
>
> "there will be an open source version, but that open source versi
Hi guys.
I must be missing, having something misconfigured. I have:
-> $ gluster volume info VMAIL
Volume Name: VMAIL
Type: Distributed-Replicate
Volume ID: 462a1850-a31a-4a17-934d-26f3996dc9b8
Status: Started
Snapshot Count: 0
Number of Bricks: 1 x 2 = 2
Transport-type: tcp
Bricks:
Brick1: 10.
On 05/11/2023 12:16, Benny Pedersen wrote:
lejeczek via dovecot skrev den 2023-11-05 12:09:
What might I have incorrect or wrong?
parrent dir miss write access for uid 2000 ?
___
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org
To unsubscribe send
Hi guys.
I see that with mailboxes stored on a network mount-point and more than one box
with Dovecot using such a mailbox, Dovecots step on each others toes.
...
lmtp(minem...@lemko.xyz)<2674357>: Error: lmtp-server:
conn unix:pid=2600068,uid=89 [2]: rcpt minemail@my.private: Mailbox INBOX:
Corru
Hello,
I'm working on an implementation of a dict server. I've looked through
all your documentation but can't seem to find how I can create the
proper URI to direct the quota plugin to use a TCP socket instead of a
UNIX socket. I'd appreciate any insight you can provide.
Steve
Hi!
I'm trying to setup dovecot 2.3.17 such that it authenticates users against a
samba4 ad dc when they connect through imap. I would also need dovecot to
authenticate the same users through sasl so that postfix can relay mails based
on the user's auth and finally I would also need for an lmtp
Hello,
Is it possible to configure SQL connection keepalive for Dovecot?
Probably what I have to do is "Note that the SQL backend must be used via
Proxy", however I was unsucsessful in figuring out how can I setup this to get use
of connection pool at Dovecot.
Thanks.
$ dovecot --version
2.
I try to setup for our mailserver (in a dc) a job backup to a secondary server
(in our office) with "doveadm backup" via the -R option. (rsync , rsnapshot and
so on tooks too long at the moment)
For the most user accounts all work as expected, but for three users it always
fails
First run:
/u
Hi Aki
I wondered, why is my answere here missing in the mailing list and now see that
the answer was directly to your email adress. ( i only pressed answer in
thunderbird and don't looked a the recipient, so i now use the webui )
My Answer was:
> I already tried to deleting of the destination
Hi!
Due to a fatal hardware error we have to extract data of all existing imap
accounts and all their boxes/folders etc. from an mdbox store starting with the
5th of december until today. Then we have to restore the old system and import
the data back into it. Mail before 5th will come from t
Hey !
Your certificate expired today, I can't access it because of my business proxy
:).
[No Error] (TLS code: X509_V_ERR_CERT_HAS_EXPIRED)
SSL Certificate expired on: Jan 2 06:31:02 2024 GMT
Have a nice day !
___
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dove
I'm trying to determine the last login time for my IMAP users.
There is already a built in plugin that does this without needing to use
scripting.
You can use it to save a timestamp to a database.
https://doc.dovecot.org/settings/plugin/last-login-plugin/
https://doc.dovecot.org/config
I also wanted to ask if it's possible to add the local server name so I can
use one database for all systems?
I suppose there's a chance there could be issues with namespace conflicts,
but this would make it much easier for me.
Not sure how you are tracking your users, in my setup each user is
We use a shared mailbox, where incoming mails from customers are stored. Every
user can see it as "shared/cont...@domain.name". When a new message comes, any
user who is currently available just takes the message and does something with
it. It's configured this way:
namespace shared {
type =
Hello,
After adding `mechanisms = plain login` to passdb (passwd-file),
`doveadm -D sync -u e...@example.com -d -N -l 30 -U` failed with
```
Jan 26 06:49:22 doveadm(e...@example.com): Error:
remote(server2.example.com:61526): doveadm(1.1.1.1,e...@example.com):
auth-master: passdb lookup(e...@
To preface, I’m using the Crossbox mail client hosted by MXroute. I was
directed to Dovecot support when I made my inquiry to the former’s developers.
Apparently, when you write an email subject that is verbatim to another,
previously sent email, the two become linked in a conversation thread.
I have configured a shared private namespace in dovecot so that, via ACLs,
users can access other users' mailboxes.
I set up a quota for each user and this also works well. The quota is monitored
and new messages are denied if the quota is exceeded.
There is one problem though: apparently dovec
Hi there! Do you have an IRC or Matrix channel, would you consider opening one
for more direct response or questions one has using dovecot? - Duje
___
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org
On 07/02/2024 12:31 EET dovecot--- via dovecot
wrote:
I have configured a shared private namespace in dovecot so
that, via ACLs, users can access other users' mailboxes.
I set up a quota for each user and this also works well.
Hi,
I have a Dovecot (IMAP only) and Postfix (SMTP) based mail server.
User names, mailbox settings and password hashes are loaded from a PostgreSQL
database.
The users use Thunderbird on the desktop and K9mail or Apple Mail on mobile
phones.
This works fine since a few years.
Now I'd like t
It seems like Maildir is the safest mailbox format for shared storage,
but even with Maildir there are warnings about the possibility of corrupting
the index files.
Would it make sense to use shared storage for the maildirs themselves,
but use the INDEX option in mail_location to store index file
Hello All.
I stumbled in a strange problem.
I have some users stored in LDAP directory.
They have uid in name.surname form and multiple mail attributes in the form of
arbitr...@domain-n.it
The Auth process works with virtual users on passdb (I can log with
arbitr...@domain-1.it and arbitr...@do
Hi Richi,
You create a user in PostgreSQL (arbitrary name, e.g. dbuserofdovecot) and use
it in the Dovecot settings in the connection string:
/etc/dovecot/dovecot-sql.conf.ext
driver = pgsql
connect = host=127.0.0.1 dbname=mymailserverdb user=dbuserofdovecot
password=P4ssw0rdForDBUserOfDoveco
I'm trying to run the Dovecot Authentication Protocol (port 12345) [1]
via SSL. Here is my non-SSL config:
service auth {
inet_listener {
port = 12345
haproxy = yes
}
}
Adding ssl=yes to the inner block doesn't seem to change anything, I
can't connect via "openssl s_client -connect
Is there a reason there are no packages for recent Debian and Ubuntu
versions?
https://repo.dovecot.org/
___
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org
As many of you probably are, I'm using Postfix together with Dovecot.
Postfix delivers mail for my users by writing them directly to the
filesystem (maildir).
I wonder is there a better alternative? I'd like to separate the two
services on different physical machines, so a shared filesystem is
LDA/LMTP is used for this purpose
On 2/29/24 15:22, Andreas via dovecot wrote:
As many of you probably are, I'm using Postfix together with Dovecot. Postfix
delivers mail for my users by writing them directly to the filesystem (maildir).
I wonder is there a better alternative? I'
, dvuoud--- via dovecot wrote:
LDA/LMTP is used for this purpose
On 2/29/24 15:22, Andreas via dovecot wrote:
As many of you probably are, I'm using Postfix together with Dovecot.
Postfix delivers mail for my users by writing them directly to the
filesystem (maildir).
I wonder is there a bet
On 2/29/24 15:54, Andreas via dovecot wrote:
Thanks! Can you say where the mapping from the user part in "From" addresses to
actual mail(sub)dir goes after switching to LMTP?
Currently, I've got a `virtual_mailbox_maps` in Postfix main.cf for this
purpose. Is there somet
On 29/02/2024 17.08, Serg wrote:
On 2/29/24 15:54, Andreas via dovecot wrote:
Thanks! Can you say where the mapping from the user part in "From"
addresses to actual mail(sub)dir goes after switching to LMTP?
Currently, I've got a `virtual_mailbox_maps` in Postfix main.cf fo
Hi,
we're about to replace our current auto-responder with pigeonhole sieve
vacation extension.
Currently the (virtual) users are able to enable and disable the
auto-responder, besides subject and message, in the webinterface and the
setting is stored in a database.
Now we're looking for a wa
On 29/02/2024 19.08, Benny Pedersen wrote:
Andreas via dovecot skrev den 2024-02-29 17:30:
How do I configure this in Dovecot? I assume the mapping can't stay
with Postfix if I migrate to LMTP – is that correct?
all alias to same mailbox, then in dovecot move mails to subfolder on
ba
Hello all,
I have been using Postfix/Dovecot for some time, but now need to setup Sieve.
As I understand this requires Dovecot to do the local mailbox delivery. In my
case LMTP would be the best.
Here is the current setup. The users on the system all have local accounts and
authenticate with K
I have an old CentOS 7 server using dovecot 2.2.36 and OpenSSL 1.0.2k-fips
that’s been fine for quite some time. Recently I started getting complaints
related to SNI.
I test with this: openssl s_client -connect mail.domain.com:993 -crlf -quiet
On macOS using OpenSSL LibreSSL 3.3.6 I test and
it is possible to do antispoofing, like
reject_authenticated_sender_login_mismatch from postfix ?
I could be wrong, but i believe dovecot submission is only a proxy to postfix
submission. Dovecot does not directly delivery mail to the world. Meaning the
mail is still passing through postfix a
Dovecot supports SAVEDATE IMAP extension [1].
This is however not implemented correctly for Maildir storage.
Compared to "internal date", "save date" is supposed to be the same
but well-defined for APPEND and preserved when COPY command is used.
However, for Maildir storage INTERNALDATE is implem
I am still getting panics. Today I'm seeing this panic only when 'eM Client'
connects. Not other imap clients. It's almost as if there's a malformed
message in my mailbox which might be causing this. I spent some time trying to
do things like delete the last 20 messages or so but no luck.
Hi Everyone!
I wonder if someone would provide me with some advice. I've been setting
up a couple of Postfix servers just for fun. I've got two Postfix
servers m1.domain.com and m2.domain.com. I can send and receive mail via
both of them. Ive also got Postfixadmin and RoundCube on them and I'm
Hi Everyone!
I wonder if someone would provide me with some advice. I've been setting
up a couple of Postfix servers just for fun. I've got two Postfix
servers m1.domain.com and m2.domain.com. I can send and receive mail via
both of them. Ive also got Postfixadmin and RoundCube on them.
I in
Hi,
I got around this by setting my mail.domain.com A record to the M1 mail server
and requesting a new certificate but by combining all domains into one
certificate with
certbot certonly -d m1.domain -d mail.domain -d webmail.domain -d mail.domain
-d mail.domain -d mail.domain.com --cert-nam
> > > breaking the mail index
> >
> > Tangentially query: is Dveocot smart enough to optimize mailbox
> renaming
> > to do index renaming (i.e. does not try to copy or recreate indices)?
> >
>
> Dovecot is, if you use LAYOUT=index. This will use only mailbox GUID on
> disk, and the folder name i
> >
> >
> > > > > breaking the mail index
> > > >
> > > > Tangentially query: is Dveocot smart enough to optimize mailbox
> > > renaming
> > > > to do index renaming (i.e. does not try to copy or recreate
> indices)?
> > > >
> > >
> > > Dovecot is, if you use LAYOUT=index. This will use only mail
> > > >
> > > > > > > breaking the mail index
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Tangentially query: is Dveocot smart enough to optimize
> mailbox
> > > > > renaming
> > > > > > to do index renaming (i.e. does not try to copy or recreate
> > > indices)?
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Dovecot is, if you use
> >
> > doveadm sync -u testacc
> 'mdbox:/home/testing/testacc/mdbox:INDEX=/home/testing/testacc/index:CONT
> ROL=/home/testing/testacc/mail/control:LAYOUT=index'
> >
> > Which gives me the expectec result. But I have also an archive
> namespace and an alt namespace that is going to be quite a lot
We've changed the list dmarc mitigation to happen unconditionally now.
What does "mitigation to happen unconditionally" mean? What was changed?
Are you talking about changing the policy action?
___
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org
To unsubs
>>>>> "dovecot---" == dovecot--- via dovecot writes:
>> We've changed the list dmarc mitigation to happen unconditionally
>> now.
dovecot---> What does "mitigation to happen unconditionally" mean?
dovecot---> What was changed? Ar
When a sender writes my email address with my username uppercase, e.g.
usern...@name.com, in the to: field of their MUA, my mail server rejects that
email. /var/log/mail.log prints:
: host mail.redacted.com[private/dovecot-lmtp] said:
550 5.1.1
> User doesn't exist: usern...@redacted
On 7/04/24 02:34, lua8ds--- via dovecot wrote:
When a sender writes my email address with my username uppercase, e.g.
usern...@name.com, in the to: field of their MUA, my mail server rejects that
email. /var/log/mail.log prints:
: host mail.redacted.com[private/dovecot-lmtp] said:
550
Hello,
I use Dovecot 2.3.20 on FreeBSD 13.2 (in jail) as a part of iRedMail
installation.
Some mailboxes are configured for automatic mails processing using sieve
(execute :pipe) and a custom binary (started by script). The system was
configured and was working correctly during several weeks.
Since
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter via dovecot
> Sent: Tuesday, April 9, 2024 5:18 AM
> To: dovecot@dovecot.org
> Subject: Strange problem with sieve
>
> Hello,
>
> I use Dovecot 2.3.20 on FreeBSD 13.2 (in jail) as a part of iRedMail
> installation.
>
with the first part of the mail I've posted). Maybe it is salted, but I
don't see how to decode it...
Peter
On 09/04/2024 16:15, Doug via dovecot wrote:
-Original Message-----
From: Peter via dovecot
Sent: Tuesday, April 9, 2024 5:18 AM
To: dovecot@dovecot.org
Subject: Strang
That looks like base64 encoding to me. Possibly your sieve script is parsing
the output and truncating the data before handing it off to base64.
Doug
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter via dovecot
> Sent: Tuesday, April 9, 2024 2:03 PM
> To: dovecot@dovecot.org
> Subje
>
> This is ... bug like.
>
> The user moves a folder inside another, the resulting path exceeds the
> maximum length, the folder's content is no longer accessible, the user
> complains.
I don't think this is a bad idea. If this is really the issue.
> Double trouble. The user proceeded to mov
maybe list rocky and centos9 stream on the repo page?
https://repo.dovecot.org/
___
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org
>
> Guys, any help?
this lacks context.
> Also, what would happen if the new server has a different hostname ?
So put temporary haproxy infront of it?
> Il giorno dom 10 mar 2024 alle ore 14:28 Gandalf Corvotempesta
> ha scritto:
> >
> > Hi guys
> > I have to migrate around 10k mailboxes fro
>
>
>
> • Gandalf Corvotempesta via dovecot [2024-04-10 21:07]:
> > Guys, any help?
>
> What you describe is exactly what I have been doing since ... forever
>
Why? The whole idea about having a LTS distribution is that you almost never
need to do this? It is
> Hello. Using Mochahost and want to delete mailbox items older than 1
> month (approx) from receipt . Reading DoveCot documentation, not finding
> age query. Can you please specify this for me and provide an example?
>
doveadm move -u $account Archive/$year mailbox "$mbox" SENTBEFORE $nyear-01
s the whole data with headers, multipart correctly encoded in
base64, and it can decode it. Probably, stdin data was not correctly
sent to binary from script in case of base64 encoded data. I would like
to understand - why? But the problem is solved now.
Peter
On 09/04/2024 20:47, Doug via do
On 11/04/24 00:07, Aki Tuomi via dovecot wrote:
- We do not build or test 2.3 with RHEL9, as it's not supported with 2.3
(yes, I am aware of the broken patch out there)
I assume you're referring to the OpenSSL 3 patch, can you elaborate on
why it's &qu
Updating:
args = username_format=%Ln
under userdb did not fix my issue.
My server still rejects incoming emails with uppercase username e.g.
USERNAME@tld.
In /etc/dovecot/conf.d/auth-passwd-file.conf.ext, before I updated with your
suggestion i.e. %Ln, I had:
passdb {
driver = passwd
On 14/04/24 12:09, John Stoffel via dovecot wrote:
I think you need to update both places, so that your username and
password checks are done with lowercase usernames.
Generally speaking you want auth to be case-sensitive, but go ahead and
try it to see if it fixes the issue.
Peter
>
> John Stoffel via dovecot skrev den 2024-04-16 14:51:
>
> > In general, usernames should NOT be case sensitive, that way leads
> > madness.
>
Linux user names are case sensitive. I tend not to argue with basis unix/linux
implementations, those are mostly well th
>
> > Linux user names are case sensitive. I tend not to argue with basis
> > unix/linux implementations, those are mostly well thought through by
> > experts. This is from before the time that 'idiot' companies started
> > using email addresses for logins, so it is easier (to track users
> > acro
On 17/04/24 00:51, John Stoffel via dovecot wrote:
"Peter" == Peter via dovecot writes:
On 14/04/24 12:09, John Stoffel via dovecot wrote:
I think you need to update both places, so that your username and
password checks are done with lowercase usernames.
Generally speaking you
>
> No they aren't. The *host part* is case insensitive because the DNS is,
Indeed. Letsencrypt is utilizing this characteristic, they query the same
hostname every time with different randomized(?) capitalizations. I have no
idea what the logics behind this is.
Preventing this from showing in
Hi,
This error occurs if you have shared mailboxes configured, but not a map
for sharing with "anyone". Dovecot then tries to perform a SQL query for
something that doesn't exist and logs this error message.
Error: acl: dict_iterate() failed: sql dict iterate failed for shared :
Invalid/unma
Hi,
This is my dovecot version:
```
root@freebsdsvr:~ # dovecot --version
2.3.21 (47349e2482)
```
I'm having trouble in making dovecot as proxy to the mail server when using
ntlm authentication.
My setup looks like this: email client --> dovecot (will act as proxy)
---> mail server
so b
howto/simple_virtual_install/#simple-virtual-install-smtp-auth
Peter
On 19/04/24 13:27, karl.l--- via dovecot wrote:
Hi,
This is my dovecot version:
```
root@freebsdsvr:~ # dovecot --version
2.3.21 (47349e2482)
```
I'm having trouble in making dovecot as proxy to the mail server when using
ntlm auth
> > I am upgrading to postfix 3.9.0. I have not used DKIM in previous
> postfix installs, but I would like to start now with the new google
> rules. I have done some research and opendkim is the most recommended,
> however, other research states the opendkim has been abandoned by it's
> maintainers
mailfromd is an
ace with mta's, even implemented for me an exporter endpoint, so now I can
chart whatever I want.
>
> I let rspamd do the DKIM (and DMARC-reporting) for me. It is actively
> maintained.
>
> > On 23 Apr 2024, at 15:50, Rupert Gallagher via dovecot
> wrot
, Joseph Tam via dovecot wrote:
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 7:33 AM wrote:
I am upgrading to postfix 3.9.0. I have not used DKIM in previous postfix
installs, but I
would like to start now with the new google rules. I have done some research
and opendkim
is the most recommended, however, other
On 25/04/24 14:34, Benny Pedersen via dovecot wrote:
+1, thanks for dovecot maillist do it right, postfix maillist fails on spf
You make a confusing, factually incomplete post with claims that are
incorrect and then complain about a lack of clear response on a
different list? If you&#x
Hi Aki
We would like NTLM support so customers that have enabled it in outlook and
other email clients can continue to authenticate when we update our dovecot
server. We are not running kerberos/samba/active directory or any other
directory system. I am not sure how GSSAPI would assist us with
Sure it's my own fault - no discussion about that, but seriously? How
dangerously unintuitive it that?
I found it when I was searching for a good practice to migrate a mail
server with rsync and I mistakably assumed it works in the same
direction as rsync.
Luckily i have a backup from all ma
Is there any solution for this?
I am on FreeBSD 13.3 with dovecot-2.3.21_4 built from ports and have noticed
warnings:
Apr 26 08:42:29 mstore17 dovecot[41779]: master: Warning: Time moved forwards
by 0.181936 seconds - adjusting timeouts.
Apr 26 08:43:39 mstore17 dovecot[41779]: master: Warning:
>
> Sure it's my own fault - no discussion about that, but seriously? How
> dangerously unintuitive it that?
>
I don't really get what is going on with remote host. How is a host name even
relevant other than setting up the initial connection. I don't even see it in
my storage mail files.
_
On 4/26/24 14:04, Aki Tuomi wrote:
We have migration guide, see
https://doc.dovecot.org/admin_manual/migrating_mailboxes/
Aki
regarding this guide:
I am supposed to set up doveadm service on the old server and then call
"doveadm backup -Ru username tcp:host:port"
on the new server? So the reas
On 4/27/24 12:31, Aki Tuomi via dovecot wrote:
Yeah. Backup command, without -R backs to location, not from location.
Mailman archive is athttps://www.dovecot.org/mailman3/mailman3/lists/
Aki
___
dovecot mailing list --dovecot@dovecot.org
To
Because, that perhaps the version missmatch of the servers coul'd be the issue
, and centos 7 eol comes in two months, i setup a complete new main mailserver,
based on
ubuntu 22.04 (24.04 was not out on starting to setup the stuff) so now both
servers had dovecot 2.3.16.
But it doesn't help, st
On 4/27/24 16:30, Nils via dovecot wrote:
I have a file backup and since that backup, new emails have been
received. Also, not all of the emails were deleted - many folders
weren't affected. Additionally I was able to restore a few of the
deleted emails with ext4magic.
So now I have
On 4/27/24 16:30, Nils via dovecot wrote:
I have a file backup and since that backup, new emails have been
received. Also, not all of the emails were deleted - many folders
weren't affected. Additionally I was able to restore a few of the
deleted emails with ext4magic.
So now I have
There is already ntpd configured and working properly.
___
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org
> Looking for some advise.
Hmmm, I am glad I took the time to arrange a proper ldap infrastructure. What
ever gets hammered stays local
>
> What I'm hoping is that dovecot has some way to in case of such
> "authentication backend" problem scenarios to ignore protocol and
> politeness and simply
>
> auth_failure_delay = 2 secs ?
>
> That will still simply wait before *rejecting* the login, compared to
> *dropping the connection*.
>
> We are thus looking for three different behaviours:
>
> 1. If backend confrims auth, ACK auth + proceed (grant access) to email.
>
> 2. If backen
I see report-ham, instead of archiving? I am not entirely sure if this is an
efficient approach to archiving. My users can only set a flag for 'auto
archiving' via sieve and then 3 months after every year messages are being
moved by cron jobs, and modification logs are put into their accounts. T
> On 2024-05-09 12:03, Marc wrote:
> > I see report-ham, instead of archiving? I am not entirely sure if this
> > is an efficient approach to archiving. My users can only set a flag for
> > 'auto archiving' via sieve and then 3 months after every year messages
> > are being moved by cron jobs, and
On 19/05/24 04:31, Richard Rosner via dovecot wrote:
I have a mailing server setup based on Debian Stable that uses postfix
(v3.7.10) for SMTP and dovecot (v2.3.19.1 (9b53102964)) for IMAP. I now
wanted to set dovecot to not write to syslog, but to dedicated files in
/var/log/dovecot. While
> Today I realized that it was indeed the sa-learn that is slowing down my
> Archiving.
>
> I added an «&» on the end of the line that calls the sa-learn (called by
> the report-ham.sieve script):
>
> exec /usr/bin/sa-learn -u ${1} --ham &
>
> Does anyone thing this is a bad idea? I noticed tha
> Am 19.05.2024 um 16:49 schrieb Richard Rosner via dovecot:
> > It most certainly isn't. nginx isn't running as root, yet it can log
> > without execution permissions just fine. Absolutely nothing should have
> > execution permissions if they aren't meant to b
On 20/05/24 01:55, Richard Rosner via dovecot wrote:
Am 19.05.24 um 15:29 schrieb Friedrich Kink via dovecot:
chmod 775 /var/log/dovecot will solve the problem. Without execute
permission the process can't access the logfile.
Why on earth does a process supposed to write to a file
I'm currently running 2.3.21 on this system and here's what I'm seeing
(a bit cut down for excess):
# doveadm quota get -u emailu...@domain.net
STORAGE 1052385
MESSAGE2741
So the storage is roughly more than 1GB according to Dovecot. No change
after quota recalc. But:
root@arrow:/home/us
I answered my own question. Sorry! It's that I'm using the zlib plugin
with maildir. Though I welcome ideas for a smooth transition to a better
quota system that won't demolish large servers as hard as dirsize would.
On 2024-05-20 17:07, jarland--- via dovecot wrote:
I'
Hey I was trying to use dovecot2 with a not libc based memory allocation
such as scudo or graphene-hardened or graphene-hardened-light but ran
into the issues I described in
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/313721
I just wanted to mention this here as well as this behavior may suggest
It shouldn't be impossible, but I've tried countless ways and not even ChatGPT
4o was able to help me! :D
I use three LDIF files to get OpenLDAP ready for testing. In the first LDIF I
just modify the schema to add the associatedDomain attributes (then I could
configure the server to serve more
701 - 800 of 6363 matches
Mail list logo
