> On 07/19/2023 2:54 PM MDT Michael Grimm via dovecot
> wrote:
>
> Michael Slusarz via dovecot wrote:
> >> On 07/18/2023 9:00 AM MDT Gerald Galster wrote:
>
> >> While I understand it takes effort to maintain the replication plugin,
> >> this is especially problematic for small active/active
On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 11:27 PM Aki Tuomi wrote:
Aki Tuomi wrote:
> Did you check the
> https://doc.dovecot.org/configuration_manual/service_configuration/#service-limits
> to see if it is documented? A pull request would be appreciated if it's
> still wrong.
Thanks for the updates. It does m
Marc wrote:
>> That simply isn't true, and I am baffled that you don't know that
>> replication works with a two server active/active setup for years now!
>> Two separate instances (active/active) on two different continents are a
>> completely reliable failover scenario for years now.
>
> Maybe
>
> That simply isn't true, and I am baffled that you don't know that
> replication works with a two server active/active setup for years now!
> Two separate instances (active/active) on two different continents are a
> completely reliable failover scenario for years now.
>
Maybe it works like t
On 2023-07-19 12:55, Gerald Galster wrote:
Le 19/07/2023 à 19:53, Michael Peddemors a écrit :
Real world is a bit different.. DNS Caching.. While DNS Round Robin is good
enough to distribute loads, it isnt' a very good method for failover, even with
a very short TTL. Many home routers, still
Michael Slusarz via dovecot wrote:
>> On 07/18/2023 9:00 AM MDT Gerald Galster wrote:
>> While I understand it takes effort to maintain the replication plugin, this
>> is especially problematic for small active/active high-availability
>> deployments.
>
> To clarify: replication absolutely do
>>> A 50-100 mailbox user server will run Dovecot CE just fine. Pro would
>>> be overkill.
>>
>> What is overkill? I always thought it had a bit more features and support.
>
> For Pro 2.3, you need (at minimum) 7 Dovecot nodes + HA authentication + HA
> storage + (minimum) 3 Cassandra nodes if
>> While I understand it takes effort to maintain the replication plugin, this
>> is especially problematic for small active/active high-availability
>> deployments.
>
> To clarify: replication absolutely does not provide "active/active".
> Replication was meant to copy data to a standby serve
> Le 19/07/2023 à 19:53, Michael Peddemors a écrit :
>> Real world is a bit different.. DNS Caching.. While DNS Round Robin is good
>> enough to distribute loads, it isnt' a very good method for failover, even
>> with a very short TTL. Many home routers, still insist on caching results
>> for a
In order to prepare for the upcoming release:
Is there an estimated release date when replication will be removed?
What is the best way (reconfigure, turn off auto replication, etc.) to migrate
to an environment to test and run using ‘doveadm sync -d’ in a scheduled job
(e.g., cron)?
Sent f
> On 07/19/2023 12:51 PM MDT Marc wrote:
>
> > A 50-100 mailbox user server will run Dovecot CE just fine. Pro would
> > be overkill.
>
> What is overkill? I always thought it had a bit more features and support.
For Pro 2.3, you need (at minimum) 7 Dovecot nodes + HA authentication + HA
stora
On Wed, 19 Jul 2023 at 20:40, Michael Slusarz via dovecot
wrote:
>
> > On 07/18/2023 9:00 AM MDT Gerald Galster wrote:
> >
> > While I understand it takes effort to maintain the replication plugin, this
> > is especially problematic for small active/active high-availability
> > deployments.
>
>
On Tue, 18 Jul 2023 at 06:47, Michael Slusarz via dovecot
wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> I want to provide a brief overview regarding various questions surrounding
> features that are being removed from Dovecot CE going forward.
>
> We are currently working on providing updated/improved website info a
>
> A 50-100 mailbox user server will run Dovecot CE just fine. Pro would
> be overkill.
>
What is overkill? I always thought it had a bit more features and support.
___
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dovec
> On 07/18/2023 9:00 AM MDT Gerald Galster wrote:
>
> While I understand it takes effort to maintain the replication plugin, this
> is especially problematic for small active/active high-availability
> deployments.
To clarify: replication absolutely does not provide "active/active".
Replicati
Le 19/07/2023 à 19:53, Michael Peddemors a écrit :
Real world is a bit different.. DNS Caching.. While DNS Round Robin is
good enough to distribute loads, it isnt' a very good method for
failover, even with a very short TTL. Many home routers, still insist
on caching results for a long time, n
Real world is a bit different.. DNS Caching.. While DNS Round Robin is
good enough to distribute loads, it isnt' a very good method for
failover, even with a very short TTL. Many home routers, still insist
on caching results for a long time, no matter what the TTL says, and of
course Windows i
Ops, my bad, you're right.
Ignore my email.
On 2023-07-19 5:58, Aki Tuomi wrote:
On 19/07/2023 01:22 EEST Jorge Bastos wrote:
Hi Guys,
Just asking, i don't see a new dovecot version since last December,
and the girhub repo has no new requests/updates.
Is there a new place for dovecot versio
It looks very similar to fixed problem in v2.3.13:
- doveadm-server: Crash could occur if logging was done outside command
handling. For example http-client could have done debug logging
afterwards, resulting in either segfault or
Panic: file http-client.c: line 642 (http_client_context_clos
19 matches
Mail list logo
