Michael Slusarz via dovecot <dovecot@dovecot.org> wrote: >> On 07/18/2023 9:00 AM MDT Gerald Galster <list+dove...@gcore.biz> wrote:
>> While I understand it takes effort to maintain the replication plugin, this >> is especially problematic for small active/active high-availability >> deployments. > > To clarify: replication absolutely does not provide "active/active". > Replication was meant to copy data to a standby server, but you can't have > concurrent mailbox access. This is why directors existed. That simply isn't true, and I am baffled that you don't know that replication works with a two server active/active setup for years now! Two separate instances (active/active) on two different continents are a completely reliable failover scenario for years now. Very irritating to read such a statement. Regards, Michael _______________________________________________ dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org
