Edward Lewis wrote:
> On 4/6/15, 12:46, "Casey Deccio" wrote:
>
> >> Isn't "owns an NS set" inferred by "zone"?
> >
> > "The NS RR states that the named host should be expected to have a zone
> > starting at owner name of the specified class" (RFC 1034).
>
> IMHO, it is more precise to talk about
On 4/8/15, 6:15, "Tony Finch" wrote:
Okay, since Tony took a longer look at the quote, I figured I ought to
also. ;)
>Edward Lewis wrote:
>> On 4/6/15, 12:46, "Casey Deccio" wrote:
>>
>> >> Isn't "owns an NS set" inferred by "zone"?
>> >
>> > "The NS RR states that the named host should be exp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Tim Wicinski wrote:
> All,
>
> As we announced in Dallas, we’ve decided to have a separate
> meeting on Special Names and RFC 6761 topics. We're planning on
> scheduling this the week of April 13th; with Thursday, April 16th
> as an initial choi
On 4/8/15 10:48 PM, str4d wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Tim Wicinski wrote:
All,
As we announced in Dallas, we’ve decided to have a separate
meeting on Special Names and RFC 6761 topics. We're planning on
scheduling this the week of April 13th; with Thursday, April
On 4/8/15 7:48 PM, str4d wrote:
> Tim Wicinski wrote:
>> All,
>
>> As we announced in Dallas, we’ve decided to have a separate
>> meeting on Special Names and RFC 6761 topics. We're planning on
>> scheduling this the week of April 13th; with Thursday, April 16th
>> as an initial choice.
>
> T
