On 4/8/15 10:48 PM, str4d wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Tim Wicinski wrote:
All,

As we announced in Dallas, we’ve decided to have a separate
meeting on Special Names and RFC 6761 topics.   We're planning on
scheduling this the week of April 13th; with Thursday, April 16th
as an initial choice.

Thanks for planning this :)

As someone who has an interest in this particular meeting but has
never watched or participated in IETF or DNSOP meetings before, how
will this meeting be conducted? How do people choose to watch or
participate? The only information I can find that might be related is
about IEFT interim meetings [0], but there is no scheduled interim
meeting for this topic [1]. Is there another mailing list or website I
should be following for more information?

[0] https://www.ietf.org/meeting/interim-meetings.html
[1] https://www.ietf.org/meeting/interim.html


Hi

Suzanne and I met earlier today, in an effort to start setting the agenda. We both realized between travel and the larger problem space, we needed more time to get this right.

We're now proposing the week of May 11th, 2015. The chairs don't wish to inflict meetings on the working group for Monday or Friday. We are considering Thursday, May 14th 1400 UTC, but will welcome any and all opinions on this matter.

Suzanne is drafting an initial agenda and should be forthcoming by week's end. Any suggestions for items are welcome.

thanks


If folks have any preference for a date, or conflicts with this
one, please let us know. We plan on having the meeting at 2pm UTC,
which would translate to 4pm CEST, 10am EST, 7am PST, and 11pm
JST. Other suggestions are also welcome-- no time is perfect for
everyone but we’re trying to accommodate the widest range of
participants that we can.

I haven't seen any further communication (on this ML) about the
meeting, so I assume the specified date and time is still the case?
Friday would work better for me than Thursday (which I can't do at 2pm
UTC), but I'm just one person.


We’re working on a detailed agenda but the initial plan is to
attempt to address both specific drafts and some of the
larger-scale issues we’re seeing around the administration of the
special-use domain names registry.

Sounds good. I look forward to seeing these issues nailed down.

str4d


thanks Tim/Suzanne

_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list
  DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=qwv/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop


_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to