Edward Lewis <edward.le...@icann.org> wrote: > On 4/6/15, 12:46, "Casey Deccio" <ca...@deccio.net> wrote: > > >> Isn't "owns an NS set" inferred by "zone"? > > > > "The NS RR states that the named host should be expected to have a zone > > starting at owner name of the specified class" (RFC 1034). > > IMHO, it is more precise to talk about domain names that own or do not own > an NS set than whatever is meant by "to have a zone starting at owner name".
I think the point of that quote is that the child zone's SOA must have the same owner as the delegation in the parent. (This often gets screwed up in load balancer configurations which causes problems because the SOA in a negative reply identifies the wrong zone.) Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <d...@dotat.at> http://dotat.at/ Forties, Cromarty, Forth, Tyne, Dogger: Variable 3 or 4, becoming south or southwest 4 or 5. Slight, occasionally moderate in north Forties and northeast Cromarty. Fog patches in Forties and Dogger. Moderate or good, occasionally very poor in Forties and Dogger. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
