The chairs can work with kazunori on a Monday night discussion (okay, I'll
sign up).
On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 10:49 AM Paul Vixie wrote:
> On Monday, 15 July 2019 13:35:33 UTC Tim Wicinski wrote:
> > The chairs felt that fujiwara-san's draft was one that needed in person
> > discussion in Montrea
On Monday, 15 July 2019 13:35:33 UTC Tim Wicinski wrote:
> The chairs felt that fujiwara-san's draft was one that needed in person
> discussion in Montreal.
hopefully kazunori will suggest a bar bof for monday night. i leave tuesday
morning and so will miss the WG meeting. my own concern is more
The chairs felt that fujiwara-san's draft was one that needed in person
discussion
in Montreal.
Also, if folks did not see his presentation at OARC, here are the slides:
https://indico.dns-oarc.net/event/31/contributions/692/attachments/660/1115/fujiwara-5.pdf
Tim
On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 11:17
> On 11 Jul 2019, at 4:00 am, Paul Vixie wrote:
>
> i like marka's proposed solution below, a lot. and muks' is also clever,
> though requiring wire protocol changes. however, fujiwara-san's proposal
> describes a broader array of fragmentation problems than just integrity, and
> we should
i like marka's proposed solution below, a lot. and muks' is also clever,
though requiring wire protocol changes. however, fujiwara-san's proposal
describes a broader array of fragmentation problems than just integrity, and
we should be looking at that broader array when making our plans.
i thin
