The chairs can work with kazunori on a Monday night discussion (okay, I'll sign up).
On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 10:49 AM Paul Vixie <p...@redbarn.org> wrote: > On Monday, 15 July 2019 13:35:33 UTC Tim Wicinski wrote: > > The chairs felt that fujiwara-san's draft was one that needed in person > > discussion in Montreal. > > hopefully kazunori will suggest a bar bof for monday night. i leave > tuesday > morning and so will miss the WG meeting. my own concern is more for packet > size than for fragmentation itself. i'd like to explain my concerns to > $somebody. > > > Also, if folks did not see his presentation at OARC, here are the slides: > > > > > https://indico.dns-oarc.net/event/31/contributions/692/attachments/660/1115/ > > fujiwara-5.pdf > > possibly to be argued, but to be not dismissed. as i wrote up-thread, the > state mass of fragmentation, harshest on receivers but also present on > transmitters, means the original EDNS0 spec ought to have said "SHOULD be > of a > size that allows the full packet with all headers to fit the local > interface > MTU and next-hop MTU" and possibly also "MAY set the DF bit if capable of > hearing and interpreting ICMP messages". > > -- > Paul > > >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
