On Monday, 15 July 2019 13:35:33 UTC Tim Wicinski wrote: > The chairs felt that fujiwara-san's draft was one that needed in person > discussion in Montreal.
hopefully kazunori will suggest a bar bof for monday night. i leave tuesday morning and so will miss the WG meeting. my own concern is more for packet size than for fragmentation itself. i'd like to explain my concerns to $somebody. > Also, if folks did not see his presentation at OARC, here are the slides: > > https://indico.dns-oarc.net/event/31/contributions/692/attachments/660/1115/ > fujiwara-5.pdf possibly to be argued, but to be not dismissed. as i wrote up-thread, the state mass of fragmentation, harshest on receivers but also present on transmitters, means the original EDNS0 spec ought to have said "SHOULD be of a size that allows the full packet with all headers to fit the local interface MTU and next-hop MTU" and possibly also "MAY set the DF bit if capable of hearing and interpreting ICMP messages". -- Paul _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
