Tony I think my perspective is mainly from a CPE implementers point of
view. Implementations are done by many third parties some who work with
operators and some who do not. Guidance in a single document would be
valuable.
John
+1-484-962-0060
-Original Message-
From: Tony Finch on
Forgot to add, I am interested in RFC3901bis.
John
+1-484-962-0060
-Original Message-
From: John Jason Brzozowski
Date: Tuesday, November 3, 2015 at 15:01
To: Mark Andrews
Cc: Brian Haberman , "dnsop@ietf.org"
, Joel Jaeggli , Fred Baker
, "suns...@ietf.org" , Paul Ebersman
, "terry.
Mark this is in part, what we are planning on doing. However, what we
want to make sure we had was standards reference(s) that we could point
implementers to. Also note this case only pertains to DNS queries that
are directed at the LAN of the CPE router i.e. 10.0.0.1. There are other
use cases
arious IPv4aas documents. See RFC6333
>section 5.5 [DS-lite] , RFC7596 section 5.1 [lw4over6] and RFC7597 section
>10 [MAP]. Curious, what is the rationale to spell this out in a separate
>document?
>
>Alain
>
>
>
>On 11/2/15, 11:30 PM, "DNSOP on behalf of Brzozowski, John&
Cross posting with dnsop and sunsets per email exchanges/conversations
with both sets of chairs.
John
-Original Message-
From: John Jason Brzozowski
Date: Monday, November 2, 2015 at 17:21
To: "suns...@ietf.org"
Cc: Fred Baker , "suzworldw...@gmail.com"
, "tjw.i...@gmail.com" , Joel
Jae
