In message , Edward Lewis writes:
> At 16:08 -0400 9/3/09, Lee Howard wrote:
>
> >You can AXFR, or you can use the same algorithm:
>
> That's the issue, keeping the zone's contents coherent (AXFR) or the
> zone's synthesis coherent (copying the algorithm from A to B).
>
> >generate on the fly-
In message , Ted Lemon writes
:
> On Sep 3, 2009, at 11:58 AM, Lee Howard wrote:
> > Education needed: how do you tell a residential user what server
> > will accept their dynamic PTR updates?
>
> I think this is an unnecessarily difficult answer. Maintaining the
> zones at the ISP is a reci
In message <002701ca2caf$549d3bd0$fdd7b3...@org>, "Lee Howard" writes:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: dnsop-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:dnsop-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Mark
> > Andrews
> > Sent: Monday, August 31, 2009 9:53 PM
> > To: Doug Barton
> > Cc: dnsop
> > Subject: Re:
Lee Howard wrote:
>>1) Zone transfers?
> Is this a requirement for IP6.ARPA zones used for residential users?
Even if it were, you can use notify and IXFR.
But, as availability of dynamic update of DNS is not very high
(there is only one master server), don't mind so many 9s.
>>2) Dynamic upda
Dean Anderson wrote:
Todd is right. While I rather doubt that the USG /would/ shut down the
roots or ARIN (thats pretty extreme), I believe the objective of the
bill is to make explicit and indisputable USG control over
infrastructure. As I understand it, the objective of the bill is so that
the
> -Original Message-
> From: dnsop-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:dnsop-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Edward
> Lewis
> Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2009 12:07 PM
> To: Lee Howard
> Cc: dnsop@ietf.org; 'Edward Lewis'
> Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Dynamically Generated PTR, was Re: ... rDNS for
IPv6..
> -Original Message-
> From: dnsop-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:dnsop-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Ted Lemon
> Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2009 1:05 PM
> To: Lee Howard
> Cc: 'dnsop'
> Subject: [DNSOP] A practical solution for ISP-level support of the reverse
DNS tree for
> IPv6
>
> On S
At 16:08 -0400 9/3/09, Lee Howard wrote:
You can AXFR, or you can use the same algorithm:
That's the issue, keeping the zone's contents coherent (AXFR) or the
zone's synthesis coherent (copying the algorithm from A to B).
generate on the fly--seems to be common practice already. It doesn'
Mark,
On Sep 2, 2009, at 10:27 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
On Sep 2, 2009, at 5:36 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
With IPv6 the address blocks should be stable to ALL customers.
Buy stock in memory manufacturers for routing vendors.
People don't move house very often.
...
ISP's don't split POPs very o
> -Original Message-
> From: dnsop-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:dnsop-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Edward
> Lewis
> Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2009 4:35 PM
> To: fujiw...@jprs.co.jp
> Cc: dnsop@ietf.org; ed.le...@neustar.biz
> Subject: [DNSOP] Dynamically Generated PTR, was Re: ... rDNS for
On Sep 3, 2009, at 11:58 AM, Lee Howard wrote:
Education needed: how do you tell a residential user what server
will accept their dynamic PTR updates?
I think this is an unnecessarily difficult answer. Maintaining the
zones at the ISP is a recipe for DoS attacks, bad configuration, angry
Dean Anderson wrote:
BTW, RFC2870 is not the authority on root server operations. The
authority is found in the MoU with ICANN that root server operators are
supposed to sign. Rumor has it that many root server operaters haven't
signed the MoU, defying ICANN's authority over their operation.
> -Original Message-
> From: dnsop-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:dnsop-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Douglas
> Otis
> Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2009 2:18 PM
> To: Doug Barton
> Cc: dnsop; Shane Kerr
> Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Draft on rDNS for IPv6: draft-howard-isp-ip6rdns-00
>
> Saying IPv6
At 11:49 -0400 9/3/09, Lee Howard wrote:
-Original Message-
From: dnsop-boun...@ietf.org ... On Behalf Of Edward Lewis
1) Zone transfers?
Is this a requirement for IP6.ARPA zones used for residential users?
Kind of.
To achieve a sufficient number "9's" of availabilty (that is "
> -Original Message-
> From: dnsop-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:dnsop-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Mark
> Andrews
> Sent: Monday, August 31, 2009 9:53 PM
> To: Doug Barton
> Cc: dnsop
> Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Draft on rDNS for IPv6: draft-howard-isp-ip6rdns-00
>
> Windows already attempts to
> Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2009 06:48:21 -0700
> From: Todd Glassey
>
> Actually Dean - good point - the MOU was never codified in a formal
> contract meaning that the US Department of Commerce still formally owns
> the root's and so under this newly proposed cyber-control law would give
> the US Presid
16 matches
Mail list logo
