On 07/30/2016 03:55 PM, Rick Moen wrote:
Quoting Simon Walter (si...@gikaku.com):
Isn't that what's being discussed? When did I say the things you
said were opposition for the Devuan Project?
'disagree with a fork of Debian'.
I've made clear what I said, and what it meant and didn't mean.
Yo
Quoting Simon Walter (si...@gikaku.com):
> First of all, if my words mean nothing to you, you should ignore
> them.
OK, ignoring the rest.
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
On Sat, 30 Jul 2016, aitor_czr wrote:
>
>
> On 07/29/2016 08:53 PM, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> >Can we get Joey Hess to review it?
> >
> >-- hendrik
>
> I don't know him, but i think that he would not oppose it :)
yes, I think it would be a very healthy iteration for us, to have his
review. many
hellekin writes:
> Dear Devuan supporters,
>
> We've been talking[0] to unixstickers.com for original, high-quality
> Devuan stickers giving back a percentage of the proceeds to the project
> as part of https://devuan.org/os/shopping. Our choice are narrowed down
> to three types of stickers, and
Simon Hobson writes:
> Rick Moen wrote:
>
>> I have a better question: Is there something about empiricism that many
>> people on this mailing list cannot cope with?
>>
>> Back when I had newly joined this mailing list and all of these idle
>> allegations and rhetorical questions started being
On 29-07-16 21:39, Jaromil wrote:
I think most people clashing with Rick here may want to stop for a
moment and realise Devuan does not need fan-boys, converted people or
preachers as much as critical and constructive minds that go across
all what we are doing and, besides encouraging it, also e
* On 2016 30 Jul 00:12 -0500, Rick Moen wrote:
> Wow, I really didn't know that. And I thought I was being pessimistic
> and harsh, but maybe I wasn't even harsh enough _by half_. Thanks for that.
This is a long read and nearly four years old, but I don't think the
situation has improved much:
On 07/30/2016 11:14 AM, Rainer Weikusat wrote:
>
> https://git.devuan.org/devuan-editors/devuan-art/uploads/30a5f6a2dbfb5124b4ba8c44a04ef334/devuan_logotype.sh.png
>
> Would look better if the encircled R wasn't there, though.
>
I agree with you. I'm clueless about legal requirements for tradem
On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 02:01:31PM +0200, info at smallinnovations.nl wrote:
> On 29-07-16 21:39, Jaromil wrote:
> >
> >I think most people clashing with Rick here may want to stop for a
> >moment and realise Devuan does not need fan-boys, converted people or
> >preachers as much as critical and co
On Sat, 30 Jul 2016 10:50:24 +0200
Jaromil wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Jul 2016, aitor_czr wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On 07/29/2016 08:53 PM, Hendrik Boom
> > wrote:
> > >Can we get Joey Hess to review it?
> > >
> > >-- hendrik
> >
> > I don't know him, but i think that he would not oppose it :)
>
On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 06:35:39AM +, hellekin wrote:
> On 07/29/2016 12:10 PM, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> >
> > Can we get Joey Hess to review it?
> >
>
> I sent him a message on IRC and by email including the draft's URL. But
> I don't know him personally, so I won't insist. If you're friend
* On 2016 30 Jul 08:40 -0500, hellekin wrote:
> On 07/30/2016 11:14 AM, Rainer Weikusat wrote:
> >
> > https://git.devuan.org/devuan-editors/devuan-art/uploads/30a5f6a2dbfb5124b4ba8c44a04ef334/devuan_logotype.sh.png
> >
> > Would look better if the encircled R wasn't there, though.
> >
>
> I agr
On Sat, 30 Jul 2016, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> If the logo is indeed a registered trademark, then the circled R may be
> required. Probably varies among jurisdictions.
it really looks bad so lets omit it. we have a registered trademark to
defend ourselves from felony of all sorts, it won't be an (r
On Sat, 30 Jul 2016 12:14:44 +0100
Rainer Weikusat wrote:
> hellekin writes:
> > https://talk.devuan.org/t/devuan-merchandise/177/2?u=hellekin
When I render the preceding on my computer with my (fairly large font)
settings, the line spacing is so narrow that the top of many letters
touch the
On Sat, 7/30/16, Steve Litt wrote:
Subject: [DNG] Bad website CSS: was Devuan Sticker Poll
To: dng@lists.dyne.org
Date: Saturday, July 30, 2016, 1:10 PM
On Sat, 30 Jul 2016 12:14:44 +0100
Rainer Weikusat wrote:
>> hellekin writes:
>> > https://talk.devuan.org/t/devuan-merchandise/177/2?u
On Sat, 30 Jul 2016 11:18:09 -0400, Steve wrote in message
<20160730111809.17c29...@mydesk.domain.cxm>:
> On Sat, 30 Jul 2016 10:50:24 +0200
> Jaromil wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 30 Jul 2016, aitor_czr wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 07/29/2016 08:53 PM, Hendrik Boom
> > > wrote:
> > > >Can we g
Quoting Hendrik Boom (hend...@topoi.pooq.com):
> It's possible that he considers toxicity is inherent in the mere
> presence of a constitution. Maybe countries need constitutions. Maybe
> systems of software just need forking.
It doesn't hurt to just _ask_ Joey his perspective.
It might ta
Quoting Hendrik Boom:
> Given the mix, I'd prefer to hear him out rather than ban him.
You-plural should _most_ certainly ban me if Dng cannot accomodate
occasional polite mocking of what I see as ideological ranting and
tunnel vision that notably fails to get anything done.
I couldn't help not
Quoting Jaromil (jaro...@dyne.org):
> On Sat, 30 Jul 2016, Nate Bargmann wrote:
>
> > If the logo is indeed a registered trademark, then the circled R may be
> > required. Probably varies among jurisdictions.
>
> it really looks bad so lets omit it. we have a registered trademark to
> defend our
Quoting Jaromil (jaro...@dyne.org):
> it really looks bad so lets omit it. we have a registered trademark to
> defend ourselves from felony of all sorts
^
Let's talk for a moment about what you can and cannot do with a
trademark.
In Europe, trademarks ca
20 matches
Mail list logo
