Has anybody done, or can point me to a *rational* comparison between those
guys, or even one including commercial products?
Thanks.
--
Yves. http://www.SollerS.ca/
xmpp:y...@zioup.com
__
On May 22, 2010, at 11:45 AM, Yves Dorfsman wrote:
> Has anybody done, or can point me to a *rational* comparison between those
> guys, or even one including commercial products?
I can't point to a rational comparison, but I can offer the following random
data-points:
- Monday morning this wee
On May 22, 2010, at 11:45 , Yves Dorfsman wrote:
Has anybody done, or can point me to a *rational* comparison between
those
guys, or even one including commercial products?
Part of the problem is that the most significant differences are
difficult to quantify: for (probably the biggest) e
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 09:45:20AM -0600, Yves Dorfsman wrote:
> Has anybody done, or can point me to a *rational* comparison between those
> guys, or even one including commercial products?
There was a panel at LISA a few years ago that featured the creators of
bcfg2, cfengine, LCFG, and puppet.
On Sat, 22 May 2010, Yves Dorfsman wrote:
> Has anybody done, or can point me to a *rational* comparison between those
> guys, or even one including commercial products?
Here is my impressions of the three. I expect I am wrong about some of
the details and invite people to correct me.
cfengine
On 05/22/2010 11:45 AM, Yves Dorfsman wrote:
>
> Has anybody done, or can point me to a *rational* comparison between those
> guys, or even one including commercial products?
>
>
> Thanks.
>
This is like asking someone for a rational comparison between
Christianity, Islam, and Scientology. But
This discussion makes me wonder - *why* isn't there a really good
commercial product? (and I do believe there isn't a good commercial
product). The addressable market seems big... like if a company got
it right (solving both small and big company needs) they could make a
lot of money.
Have there
On May 22, 2010, at 15:45 , Dana Quinn wrote:
This discussion makes me wonder - *why* isn't there a really good
commercial product? (and I do believe there isn't a good commercial
I'm under the strong impression that commercial offerings are either
(a) productized internal tools
(b) add-ons
Yves Dorfsman wrote:
> Has anybody done, or can point me to a *rational* comparison between those
> guys, or even one including commercial products?
Here is the configuration management panel from Open Source Bridge 2009.
- Luke Kanies from Reductive Labs for Puppet
- Brendan Strejcek of Cfengine
Dana Quinn made the following keystrokes:
>This discussion makes me wonder - *why* isn't there a really good
>commercial product? (and I do believe there isn't a good commercial
>product). The addressable market seems big... like if a company got
>it right (solving both small and big company
Joe McDonagh writes:
> what's most important to me in a
> programming language of any type is expressibility or usability for the
> task at hand.
>
> This is why I chose puppet. Puppet's DSL is made of awesome. I've looked
> at chef but it just doesn't jive with me, but the reason it doesn't is
>
Yves> Has anybody done, or can point me to a *rational* comparison
Yves> between those guys, or even one including commercial products?
And include what infrastructure each requires? I'm perenially about
the deploy Cfengine at work, but I keep thinking I should look at
Puppet, BCFG and others.
12 matches
Mail list logo