Hal, on the Rust v Go issue. I am speaking as a consumer of your code, who
builds from source.
There is talk on the LKML, about adding Rust as an allowed language. There
seems to be no objection in principle, work is proceeding. Much of my
knowledge of Rust is from those threads,
The issue I h
This is output from my 17 year old server, i386, 32-bit, no TXCO, cheap
hardware, sitting in an airconditioned office where staff keep fiddling
with the thermostat (the large unit is 20 years old, so you are either cold
or very cold).
root@ntpmon:~# uptime
10:20:02 up 14 days, 9:33, 1 user, lo
This is a follow on to Eric's email a few hours ago, I am keeping that
thread clean.
(The last 3GL I programmed in was Fortran, and not the 77 version. I can
read bash scripts and C pseudo-code)
The literature I can find speaks of Go GC being improved in 1.5, such that
the STW phase (the "sweep"
Hi,
Fedora 34 has shipped. Among other changes, ntpsec replaces ntpd during an
upgrade.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/34/ChangeSet#ntp_replacement
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NtpReplacement
Thanks, Miroslav.
--
Sanjeev Gupta
+65 98551208 http://www.linkedin.com/in/gha
Hal, newbie question.
What use case on the internet would be saturating a Gb link with NTP?
Surely, before that, we should be recommending a second server closer to
the clients?
Assume a large University campus, with 3 nodes (5k students, each with
a tablet and phone, etc). Assume all nodes
As of 20 minutes ago, I can now pull from the repository unauthenticated.
On Fri, 18 Dec 2020, 8:21 am Eric S. Raymond, wrote:
> Neustifter Andreas :
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have searched for similar incidents (e.g.
> https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/gl-infra/infrastructure/-/issues/6022)
> which lead m
Ah, so not my fault.
I tried updating my fork about 11 hours ago, and was to authenticate to
pull from the NTPsec git repo. I tried with another repo, it worked, so I
assumed one of us was modifying the security settings of the repo.
On Thu, 17 Dec 2020, 7:38 am James Browning via devel,
wrote:
On Sun, Sep 6, 2020 at 11:13 PM James Browning via devel
wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 3:59 PM Hal Murray via devel
> wrote:
> > Can we run ntpd long enough to test the initialization and much of the
> other code?
>
> Possibly, but to test some of the code paths (NTS) would take about a
> day.
Ian, please see this, in ntpsnmpd.py
if source == ntp.control.CTL_SST_TS_UNSPEC:
mode = 2 # Not yet synced
elif False:
mode = 3 # No reference configured
elif source == ntp.control.CTL_SST_TS_LOCAL:
mode = 4 # Distributing local clock
They support *any* git repository.
Please see: https://lgtm.com/projects/g/ntpsec/ntpsec/?mode=list
--
Sanjeev Gupta
+65 98551208 http://www.linkedin.com/in/ghane
___
devel mailing list
devel@ntpsec.org
http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/deve
On Sat, Jul 11, 2020 at 10:56 AM Hal Murray via devel
wrote:
>
> It's still listening on both 123 and 4460
>
> I want to remove listening on 123 right before Mark releases 1.2.0
>
Hal, why wait till just before the release? Switch the code now, so that
the NTPsec testers can remind each other t
Hal,
I have solved the issue for now, by changing the group of the live/and
archive/ directories in /etc/letsencrypt to ntp,and giving the group read
permissions.
root@ntpmon:/etc/letsencrypt# ls -l
total 36
drwx-- 4 root root 4096 Oct 21 2018 accounts
drwxr-x--- 3 root ntp 4096 Jan 17 20
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 12:23 PM Hal Murray wrote:
> > Which causes ntpd to fail on startup (I assume after dropping root):
>
> Looks like you are dying trying to read the certificate. It will get
> worse
> when you want to read the key.
>
> --
>
> Do you trust user ntp? If so, the f
(git commit 892fbb435e71349da502b7e2436648f52a09af6f )
Hal, I have the other end of the stick now.
My LetsEncrypt certificate path is /etc/letsencrypt/archive/ntpmon.dcs1.biz/
The file:
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3558 May 9 09:39 fullchain28.pem
However,
root@ntpmon:/etc/letsencrypt# ls -dl /etc/l
On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 5:51 AM Hal Murray via devel
wrote:
> I'm expecting there will be a new port number assigned for the KE server.
> Step 1 will be to listen on both old and new port #
> Step 2 is to switch the client side to default to the new port #.
> Step 3 is to stop listening on
On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 12:56 PM Hal Murray via devel
wrote:
> The code is still there. I don't know if it works or anybody uses it.
>
> I don't see any mention of it in NEWS. Do you have a line number?
>
git show 0a46b8bbcd
bottom of docs/ntpsec.adoc
My apologies, I misread the line. You a
Andrew, Daniel,
I am trying to track down if MS-SNTP support was added back, and if it is
supported.
We have an entry in the news file, about removal, but none on addition.
--
Sanjeev Gupta
+65 98551208 http://www.linkedin.com/in/ghane
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 3:32 AM Andrew Bartlett wrot
On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 3:42 AM Gary E. Miller via devel
wrote:
>
> I did this at the suggestion of Mark Atwood. He is project head for
> gpsd, NTPsec and other projects. He also works at Amazon on software
> license issues. The MAGA have deemed that the current copyright notices
> in gpsd are
(cc: to devel@ntpsec)
Hi,
Over at the NTPsec project (whose developer community intersects with
gpsd's) they have scrubbed the Copyright Year from the "Form of Notice".
eg:
-* Copyright (c) University of Delaware 1992-2015 *
+* Copyright University of Delaware
Hal,
I have sent in a MR,
https://gitlab.com/NTPsec/ntpsec/-/merge_requests/1121
for your review.
--
Sanjeev Gupta
+65 98551208 http://www.linkedin.com/in/ghane
On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 3:21 PM Hal Murray via devel
wrote:
>
> devel@ntpsec.org said:
> > Much our of NTS code uses BSD-4-Claus
https://www.zdnet.com/article/the-y2k-bug-is-back-causing-headaches-for-developers-again/
"Say you are an institution founded in 1920. It is safe to assume that you
are not sitting on any information dated from before then; and so, in the
double-digit date-recording system, "20" becomes your pivot
Merge Request submitted.
--
Sanjeev Gupta
+65 98551208 http://www.linkedin.com/in/ghane
On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 10:13 AM Sanjeev Gupta wrote:
> I will do that, and re-read Quick-NTS (which was written early on).
>
> --
> Sanjeev Gupta
> +65 98551208 http://www.linkedin.com/in/ghane
>
I will do that, and re-read Quick-NTS (which was written early on).
--
Sanjeev Gupta
+65 98551208 http://www.linkedin.com/in/ghane
On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 7:22 AM Hal Murray via devel
wrote:
>
> > links to the NTPsec quickstart page -
> > https://docs.ntpsec.org/latest/quick.html
> > whic
/me gets popcorn, sits back:-)
--
Sanjeev Gupta
+65 98551208 http://www.linkedin.com/in/ghane
___
devel mailing list
devel@ntpsec.org
http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
From: docs/driver_shm.adoc
Is the first paragraph still required, if it doesn't apply to current
nrpsec?
And I cant parse the second paragraph, especially the first line. What
should I use? Not the ancient method, surely?
The _GPSD_ man page suggests setting minpoll and maxpoll to 4. That was
in RAN:
https://www.ericsson.com/en/blog/2019/8/what-you-need-to-know-about-timing-and-sync-in-5G-transport-networks
--
Sanjeev Gupta
+65 98551208 http://www.linkedin.com/in/ghane
On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 6:54 AM Richard Laager via devel
wrote:
> On 11/17/19 6:44 AM, Sanjeev Gupta via deve
Hal,
I met Christer W (Netnod) and Dieter S (PTB) at the Hackathon.
Interesting discussion on the 5G requirements, and Christer's setup (his
NTS-KE feeding a patched Chrony).
Good to put a face to an email address.
--
Sanjeev Gupta
+65 98551208 http://www.linkedin.com/in/ghane
On Sun, No
Hi,
Is there anyone on this list in Singapore this week?
I see the Netnod NTS implementation listed in the Hackathon wiki, but could
not find anyone yesterday.
--
Sanjeev Gupta
+65 98551208 http://www.linkedin.com/in/ghane
___
devel mailing list
d
Hi,
There has been work done (I believe Gary and Hal) on seccomp in NTPsec.
There is a writeup on Postgresql's experience with this, here is a free
link for non-subscribers to LWN:
http://bit.ly/2oGeI5j
I find that if you come back in a few days, the comments are informative,
and add a great
Hi,
IETF 106 is in Singapore in November. For once, I am in the same country
(at least as far as my travel plans stand now)
Interop? What can I do to sweeten your trip here?
--
Sanjeev Gupta
+65 98551208 http://www.linkedin.com/in/ghane
___
deve
:56 +0800
> Sanjeev Gupta via devel wrote:
>
> > Eric, there is a incompatibility break, so could we do 1.2.0 , please?
>
> What is the break?
>
> RGDS
> GARY
> ---
> Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 N
Eric, there is a incompatibility break, so could we do 1.2.0 , please?
--
Sanjeev Gupta
+65 98551208 http://www.linkedin.com/in/ghane
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 1:47 AM Eric S. Raymond via devel
wrote:
> We're preparing for a minor point release, probably 1.17, on or about
> 1 Aug.
>
> Code
On Sun, Aug 25, 2019 at 1:49 PM Achim Gratz via devel
wrote:
> Mark Atwood via devel writes:
> > How does everyone feel about next Saturday, Aug 31 2019-07-31?
>
> You've got a time machine? 8-)
>
No, but as Chronos is not implemented, he can set time to what ever he
wants on the NIST and USN
On Sun, Aug 25, 2019 at 4:46 AM Hal Murray via devel
wrote:
> The 3rd case is when it gets back something other than "ntske/1".
> I haven't found a test case for that one yet. If anybody still has a
> system
> still running our old/buggy code, please let me know the IP Address.
>
Hal, 203.123.4
Eric
NEWS:
The NTS ALPN negotiation sequence has been modified for improved
interoperability with orther NTS implementations.
Would this be a better formulation?
The NTS ALPN negotiation sequence now checks for length of the handshake
string.
This may break interoperability with other, non-compli
:43 AM Sanjeev Gupta via devel
> wrote:
>
>> We need a point release. Significant things that have happened recently:
>>
>>
>>- The g and G suffixes
>>- Removal of neoclock4x
>>- Some doc changes
>>- The ALPN change
>>
>>
On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 2:36 AM Matthew Selsky
wrote:
> Does it make sense to call this 1.2.0 instead of 1.1.7? Especially since
> we have the ALPN compatiblity fix?
>
Yes, please. Although NTS implementation internally has (only trivially)
changed, a bump to 1.2.0 would provide more warning to
We need a point release. Significant things that have happened recently:
- The g and G suffixes
- Removal of neoclock4x
- Some doc changes
- The ALPN change
The last is critical, it throws into doubt all the interop we have with
other NTS implementations. We need a tag to describe o
On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 1:45 PM Hal Murray via devel
wrote:
>
> There is probably something like a FAQ entry that explains that if you
> want to
> get time relevant data from A to B, you have to start by sending something
> from B to A, a nonce if nothing else.
>
> You could eliminate duplicates
On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 7:22 AM Eric S. Raymond via devel
wrote:
> Hal Murray :
> > I remember a comment about there being no way to do broadcast securely.
> It
> > would be good to include an expanded version of that in the
> documentation.
>
> That's covered. In the page on NTPsec changes:
>
>
On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 7:35 PM Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> Sanjeev Gupta via devel :
> > I have a feeling that was also removed, at some time. Has it?
>
> I do not recall that we explicitly removed it. But I wouldn't count on
> it to work without testing.
>
Th
Hi,
I know that broadcast *client* mode was removed last year, because it was
impossible to secure.
Broadcast *server* mode was deprecated.
I have a feeling that was also removed, at some time. Has it?
--
Sanjeev Gupta
+65 98551208 http://www.linkedin.com/in/ghane
I can vouch for the fact that 100% of grouchy/lazy hobbyists running EOL
equipment who tried this gave this feature five stars.
It is not only my Puck that is EOL, but my i686 as well.
Eric, next request. I have a spare parallel port on the system, could I
have a software patch so that it can con
Eric,
It works, perfectly.
refclock shm unit 1 prefer refid PPS time1 0g flag4 1
refclock shm unit 0 refid GPS time1 0.450g flag4 1
Note that the first line (PPS) also needs a "g" suffix, else I am reset to
19 years ago.
gpsmon still shows wrong time, but I need that only to check skyview.
Th
Eric,a data point. This works:
refclock shm unit 0 refid GPS time1 619315200.450 flag4 1
(the large number is 1024 weeks, the 0.450 is a delay)
--
Sanjeev Gupta
+65 98551208 http://www.linkedin.com/in/ghane
On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 5:04 AM Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> Sanjeev Gupta :
> > Eri
On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 6:14 AM Gary E. Miller via devel
wrote:
>
> On Sat, 17 Aug 2019 06:07:14 +0800
> Sanjeev Gupta wrote:
>
> > The widest integer I have is "long long int", which is 8 bytes. I
> > need a bit more for "nuber of secs in 8192 weeks".
>
> Here is my math:
>
> seconds in 8192 w
Gary,
The widest integer I have is "long long int", which is 8 bytes. I need a
bit more for "nuber of secs in 8192 weeks".
I reproduce my attempt at C below, have I goofed up?
root@ntpmon:~/ntpsec# cat /tmp/aa.c
#include
int main()
{
int integerType;
long int longi
Gary,
On my 32 bit x86, gcc 8
Size of int: 4 bytesSize of long int: 4 bytesSize of long long int: 8
bytesSize of float: 4 bytesSize of double: 8 bytesSize of long double:
12 bytesSize of char: 1 byte
I have cast explicitly to (long double), please review:
https://gitlab.com/NTPsec/ntpsec/merge_
Eric,
double is 8 bytes
long double is 12 bytes
Long double should be enough, I think
--
Sanjeev Gupta
+65 98551208 http://www.linkedin.com/in/ghane
On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 5:01 AM Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> Sanjeev Gupta :
> > Eric,
> >
> > sizeof(double) seems to be 8 bytes. The 8192 *
Eric,
My (minimal) config:
root@ntpmon:~/ntpsec/docs# grep -v "^#" /etc/ntp.conf | grep -v "^$"
logfile /var/www/html/ntp/ntpd.log
logconfig =syncall +clockall +peerall +sysall
statsdir /var/www/html/ntp/
filegen loopstats type day link
filegen peerstats type day link
filegen protostats type da
Eric,
sizeof(double) seems to be 8 bytes. The 8192 * No of Secs per week
overflows this.
More info below:
root@ntpmon:/tmp# gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/i686-linux-gnu/8/lto-wrapper
Target: i686-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../src/configure -v --wit
Eric,
I am using the SHM driver , which talks to gpsd. The presence of the "g"
suffix causes the line to be ignored.
root@ntpmon:~/ntpsec# grep refclock /etc/ntp.conf
refclock shm unit 0 refid GPS time1 0.650g flag4 1
root@ntpmon:~/ntpsec# kill -9 `pidof ntpd` ; ntpd -D 100
root@ntpmon:~/ntpsec
Eric,
On a 32-bit debian:
[ 73/101] Compiling ntpd/ntp_io.c
../../ntpd/ntp_scanner.c: In function ‘yylex’:
../../ntpd/ntp_scanner.c:40:30: warning: integer overflow in expression of
type ‘long int’ results in ‘659554304’ [-Woverflow]
#define GPS_ERA_13BIT (8192L * SECONDS_IN_WEEK)
Gary,
True, and I see you are busy with gpsd these days.
My suggestion:
The last commit to ntpsec that touched code was over two months ago. In
that sense, we have already had a quiet time :-)
Eric will look at the open issues list. I assume there is nothing critical
there, most of the reports
Release, release release!
On Tue, 18 Jun 2019, 9:59 AM Gary E. Miller via devel,
wrote:
> Yo Eric!
>
> On Mon, 17 Jun 2019 21:54:54 -0400
> "Eric S. Raymond via devel" wrote:
>
> > Sanjeev Gupta :
> > > On Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 8:47 PM Eric S. Raymond
> > > wrote:
> > > > Do you cansider the NT
On Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 8:47 PM Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> Do you cansider the NTS documentation to be in good shape?
>
Yes, enough to get it up and running. I have moved the Quickstart from
devel/ to docs/ , and merged it into the existing documentation.
I have had an NTS server running publicl
Hi,
We have 26 issues on the tracker, https://gitlab.com/NTPsec/ntpsec/issues
As NTS support works (for me, and in interop), could we triage and release?
--
Sanjeev Gupta
+65 98551208 http://www.linkedin.com/in/ghane
___
devel mailing list
devel@n
Hi,
I just realised something: LetsEncrypt certs are max 90 days. When I renew
them, will I need to restart NTPd?
So the max uptime of NTPd is 90 days? This does not matter now, when I am
doing a git pull, build, restart daily, but would it have an impact in
production?
Can the S2C code check
Gary, no, I didn't install their cert chain.
Do you need access to my host?
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019, 9:25 AM Gary E. Miller via devel
wrote:
> Yo Sanjeev!
>
> On Thu, 28 Mar 2019 09:16:17 +0800
> Sanjeev Gupta wrote:
>
> > Mine works.
>
> Odd.
>
> > root@ntpmon:~/ntpsec# git describe
> > NTPsec_1
Updated mine, thanks.
--
Sanjeev Gupta
+65 98551208 http://www.linkedin.com/in/ghane
On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 2:53 PM Hal Murray via devel
wrote:
> > I had the same problem, just change this
> > ntpd/nts_client.c: const char *label = "EXPORTER-nts/1";
> > To this:
> > ntpd/nts_client.c: c
Done. Thanks.
--
Sanjeev Gupta
+65 98551208 http://www.linkedin.com/in/ghane
On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 11:40 PM Hal Murray wrote:
>
> The server response wasn't setting up the right length for the encrypted
> part.
> The client receive side didn't use that field but computed the length
> a
Gary,
It works with a mix of NTS and NTP, I removed the NTP to force it to sync
with your servers.
All seems OK now.
On Fri, Mar 22, 2019, 12:20 PM Gary E. Miller wrote:
> Yo Sanjeev!
>
> On Fri, 22 Mar 2019 08:31:34 +0800
> Sanjeev Gupta wrote:
>
> > I removed all non-NTS servers from my co
Gary,
I removed all non-NTS servers from my config,and I am now synced!!!
root@ntpmon:~/ntpsec# ntpq -p
remote refid st t when poll
reach delay offset jitter
==
Gary,
Adding this to /etc/services seems to fix the issue:
ntp 123/tcp # Network Time Protocol
I now see:
-pi3.rellim.com .PPS.1 84 64
37 197.8958 0.5317 0.4966
-kong.rellim.com 204.17.205.1
On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 7:24 AM Gary E. Miller via devel
wrote:
> > I have been lurking and trying to set up NTS to talk to the rellim.com
> > servers. This is a recent git head.
>
> Cool.
>
I just did a git pull and rebuilt.
> > My ntp.conf snippet:
> >
> > nts enable
> > nts cert /etc/letse
Hi,
I have been lurking and trying to set up NTS to talk to the rellim.com
servers. This is a recent git head.
My ntp.conf snippet:
nts enable
nts cert /etc/letsencrypt/live/ntpmon.dcs1.biz/fullchain.pem
nts key /etc/letsencrypt/live/ntpmon.dcs1.biz/privkey.pem
server pi3.rellim.com nts
server
I recently switched from namecheap to Gandi, because Gandi has better
DNSSec support.
Namecheap will offer you a .xyz or .vip domain for under $2 for the first
year, $10 renewal.
Basic DNS is included by all. But if you want something better,please have
a look at https://dns.he.net. HE has serv
On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 2:04 PM Hal Murray via devel
wrote:
>
> Testing. Get it up and running in your local environment. If you have a
> real
> certificate and are willing to support some testing traffic, tell me/us
> the
> host name and/or send us the root certificate.
>
I have a server runn
Hi,
I just noticed this, no idea when this started.
Feb 12 18:29:50 ntpmon ntpd[2152]: INIT: ntpd ntpsec-1.1.3+
2019-02-12T10:25:36Z (git rev b4f55578e): Starting
Feb 12 18:29:50 ntpmon ntpd[2152]: INIT: Command line: ntpd -c /etc/ntp.conf
Feb 12 18:29:50 ntpmon ntpd[2153]: INIT: precision = 0.36
On Sat, Feb 2, 2019 at 8:57 AM Richard Laager via devel
wrote:
>
> About 19% of the world is doing DNSSEC validation, in large part because
> apparently 15% of the world is using Google's recursive DNS service.
>
Actually,things are much worse.
The Google resolver checks for valid DNSSEC, and s
Hal,
debian testing has 1.67
OpenSuse Tumbleweed has 1.68
--
Sanjeev Gupta
+65 98551208 http://www.linkedin.com/in/ghane
On Sun, Jan 13, 2019 at 9:00 AM Hal Murray via devel
wrote:
> The draft has links to two chunks of software.
> https://gitlab.com/MLanger/nts/
> https://github.com
Gary, Hal,
If you bump up your scale factor in the pool, traffic will ramp up slowly,
over days or weeks.
If you bump down, or leave, traffic will take months, or longer, to stop.
On Sat, 12 Jan 2019, 4:02 am Hal Murray via devel
> Gary said:
> > I have a RasPi in the ntp pool. Typically aro
Achim, apologies for the lack of clarity.
500pps is TX. RX is slightly higher.
--
Sanjeev Gupta
+65 98551208 http://www.linkedin.com/in/ghane
On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 3:42 AM Achim Gratz via devel
wrote:
> Sanjeev Gupta via devel writes:
> > PPS is about 500/s, RX is 10% mor
On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 2:23 AM Achim Gratz via devel
wrote:
> Sanjeev Gupta via devel writes:
> > root@ntpmon:~# ntpq -n -c direct -c mrulist | wc -l
> > 17306
> >
> > I am in the sg, in, and asia pools. v4 and v6. Server access is
> available
> > if you
On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 12:57 AM Eric S. Raymond via devel
wrote:
> Achim Gratz via devel :
> > > Anyway, I think that thinking about them as separate parts will help
> our
> > > discussions.
> > > We should be able to improve performance on busy servers.
> >
> > It's been decades since I looked a
On Tue, Dec 25, 2018 at 3:32 AM Hal Murray via devel
wrote:
> The usual solution to the maintain 2 places problem is to write a program
> to
> translate one format into the other. Then we have to maintain that
> program. :)
>
Which program? The C or the Python?
Double :-)
--
Sanjeev Gupta
+6
Apologies. I meant that the current continuous integration is being tested
only on Alpine, hence a breakage on Fedora may not be caught automatically.
I build, with all reflcocks and docs, on Debian testing and Ubuntu dev
weekly, no problems here.
On Sun, 2 Dec 2018, 9:46 pm Hal Murray via devel
Gary, Hal,
If I am reading the ci.yaml file right,the docs are being built only on an
Alpine image,not on Fedora, etc.
Matt is maintaining this file, I think
--
Sanjeev Gupta
+65 98551208 http://www.linkedin.com/in/ghane
On Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 6:17 AM Gary E. Miller via devel
wrote:
> Yo
On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at 12:54 AM Paul Theodoropoulos
wrote:
> On 9/21/2018 1:07 AM, Sanjeev Gupta wrote:
>
> My concern is that the space between "25" and "kg" should be
> non-breaking. Else, readability suffers badly. How do you do this in
> asciidoc?
>
>
> By non-breakingI assume you mean
Paul,
Personally, I find 25kg, 50ppm, 3m, more readable; but that is neither here
nor there.
My concern is that the space between "25" and "kg" should be non-breaking.
Else, readability suffers badly. How do you do this in asciidoc?
--
Sanjeev Gupta
+65 98551208 http://www.linkedin.com/in/
https://xkcd.com/1987/
Enough said?
--
Sanjeev Gupta
+65 98551208 http://www.linkedin.com/in/ghane
___
devel mailing list
devel@ntpsec.org
http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Jason, yes, that is the result of the bounty offer.
I have not had a chance to play with it, but the offer included a
requirement to upstream into cacti and provide a working example.
--
Sanjeev Gupta
+65 98551208 http://www.linkedin.com/in/ghane
On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 3:35 AM, Jason Azze
Please see
https://github.com/netniV/cacti-templates/tree/master/NTP
On 27 Feb 2018 7:45 pm, "Sanjeev Gupta" wrote:
Apologies.
I checked an hour ago, and the guy who assured me that we were using
'native' SNMP has come back saying he setup the cacti script that talks
over ntpq
I have posted
Apologies.
I checked an hour ago, and the guy who assured me that we were using
'native' SNMP has come back saying he setup the cacti script that talks
over ntpq
I have posted a bounty offer on the cacti forum.
Apologies for raising hopes.
On 27 Feb 2018 7:40 pm, "Jason Azze via devel" wrote:
PM, Ian Bruene via devel
wrote:
>
>
> On 02/26/2018 06:13 PM, Sanjeev Gupta via devel wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> For what it is worth, I am running the ntpsnmpd code on a number of debian
> and ubuntu machines for some time, including one with an actual GPS. No
> issues
(apologies for the top posts)
Richard, I am using cacti. Have been planning to add it to observium as
well, will try tonight.
--
Sanjeev Gupta
+65 98551208 http://www.linkedin.com/in/ghane
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 8:14 AM, Richard Laager wrote:
> On 02/26/2018 06:13 PM, Sanjeev Gupta wro
Hi,
For what it is worth, I am running the ntpsnmpd code on a number of debian
and ubuntu machines for some time, including one with an actual GPS. No
issues so far.
I just like to see graphs.
--
Sanjeev Gupta
+65 98551208 http://www.linkedin.com/in/ghane
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 8:09 AM,
> That works only because we install in /usr/local/ while the system
version of
> ntp classic gets installed in /usr/ What's going to happen if a distro
> packages up our stuff and somebody wants to install both our code and ntp
> classic?
For a distro, like Debian, the new package would be calle
> - sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get -us dist-upgrade && sudo
apt-get -u dist-upgrade && sudo apt-get autoremove
I find
apt-get --purge autoremove
better, as it removes any config files as well, reducing surprises when you
next re-install a package.
--
Sanjeev Gupta
+65 98551208
> 2. Provide tools, options and support, for binary downstreams (Debian,
> Mint, etc.), to repackage ntpsec components as binaries, integrated with
> their install tools.
As a start, as Richard has already done the work of packaging ntpsec for
Debian, perhaps we could include his "patches" in HEAD
Hi,
I would dearly love to see #204 (/etc/ntp.d) be included in 1.0.
As a SysAdm, I typically read the new features list rarely. If it does not
land in 1.0 (and pacakge managers and I do not start using it then), it may
never get used.
--
Sanjeev Gupta
+65 98551208 http://www.linkedin.com
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 7:11 AM, Gary E. Miller via devel
wrote:
> > Sanjeev, keep those servers mothballed, unless you have a personal
> > itch make hpux work.
>
> Oh, I hope not... Give them to a museum, if they'll take them...
Gary, the critical word there is "if". How do you think I landed
On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 2:55 PM, Mark Atwood via devel
wrote:
> Hilariously, I don't know where we can get a HPUX lab machine.
I have two (mothballed) HP Integrity servers, Itanium architecture. I
think they have HPUX installed.
If there is interest, I can power on, and turn over to whoever is
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 3:23 AM, Matthew Selsky via devel
wrote:
>
> Sanjeev/Hal,
>
> Did waf's endian-ness test not detect this properly?
It worked perfectly, no manual intervention or extra parameters required.
--
Sanjeev Gupta
+65 98551208 http://www.linkedin.com/in/ghane
_
After a fruitless two months trying to find a big endian machine, I finally
booted a qemu instance.
Running Debian 7, 256M RAM, 32 bit. gcc 4.6, kernel 3.2
buildprep fails because Debian 7 did not have libseccomp. I installed
python-dev, bison, and build-essential manually.
waf configured, bui
95 matches
Mail list logo
