Eric NEWS: The NTS ALPN negotiation sequence has been modified for improved interoperability with orther NTS implementations.
Would this be a better formulation? The NTS ALPN negotiation sequence now checks for length of the handshake string. This may break interoperability with other, non-compliant, NTS implementations. Basically, I wish to highlight that things may *break* with pre 1.2.0 -- Sanjeev Gupta +65 98551208 http://www.linkedin.com/in/ghane On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 2:12 AM Eric S. Raymond <e...@thyrsus.com> wrote: > Sanjeev Gupta <gha...@gmail.com>: > > We need a point release. Significant things that have happened recently: > > > > > > - The g and G suffixes > > - Removal of neoclock4x > > - Some doc changes > > - The ALPN change > > > > The last is critical, it throws into doubt all the interop we have with > > other NTS implementations. We need a tag to describe our implementation, > > so that we can test again. > > > > Please note only the first point above is captured in the NEWS file. > > I just added notes about the neoclock removal and the ALPN change. > > I concur that a oint release is indicated. > -- > <a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond</a> > > >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@ntpsec.org http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
