Re: [SailfishDevel] Harbour validation rules for SFOS 3.3

You are welcome! Thanks for update, I just re-submit OSM Scout 2.2 to Harbour. Lukas Dne úterý 19. května 2020 10:13:07 CEST Ville Nummela napsal(a): > On 12.5.2020 15.25, Ville Nummela wrote: > > On 12.5.2020 12.35, Lukáš Karas wrote: > >> Both cases looks like false positive to me. Or there is

Re: [SailfishDevel] Harbour validation rules for SFOS 3.3

On 12.5.2020 15.25, Ville Nummela wrote: On 12.5.2020 12.35, Lukáš Karas wrote: Both cases looks like false positive to me. Or there is any real reason to rejecting such binaries? You are right, these are both false positives. We will fix the validator. I will let you know (on this list) when

Re: [SailfishDevel] Harbour validation rules for SFOS 3.3

On 12.5.2020 16.07, Lukáš Karas wrote: Great to hear that :-) I may provide patch to speedup this fix, it seems to be simple shell script: https://github.com/sailfishos/sdk-harbour-rpmvalidator/blob/master/ rpmvalidation.sh#L1066 Question is, how it should be checked? Just ELF excutables and ig

Re: [SailfishDevel] Harbour validation rules for SFOS 3.3

Hi. > > You are right, these are both false positives. We will fix the > validator. I will let you know (on this list) when it's done. > Great to hear that :-) I may provide patch to speedup this fix, it seems to be simple shell script: https://github.com/sailfishos/sdk-harbour-rpmvalidator/

Re: [SailfishDevel] Harbour validation rules for SFOS 3.3

Hi, On 12.5.2020 12.35, Lukáš Karas wrote: ERROR [/usr/share/harbour-osmscout/map-icons/bus_stop.svg] Hardcoded path: inkscape:export-filename="/home/tim/projects/OSMScout/libosmscout/data/icons/ 14x14/standard/bus_stop.png" Another "errors" comes from application binary itself, for example

[SailfishDevel] Harbour validation rules for SFOS 3.3

Hi. I updated my application OSM Scout yesterday and it was rejected to Harbout, because it contains "hardcoded paths". Even check in SDK fails, so I may reproduce it (http://localhost:8080/C/harbour_tools/). But the reason seems to be weird to me. For example recent export path in SVG file

Re: [SailfishDevel] Harbour icon templates

You need to download Sailfish-Apps-icon-template.zip (by pressing Download zip button), it has those templates in all kinds of vector formats too. Cheers, -Slava Hi, The icon templates in https://sailfishos.org/design/icons/ are offered in 86x86 only (the pngs at least), while expected re

[SailfishDevel] Harbour icon templates

Hi, The icon templates in https://sailfishos.org/design/icons/ are offered in 86x86 only (the pngs at least), while expected resolutions go up to 172x172, should probably go with the higher one for people using image editor instead of vector. Regards, szopin -- Sent from my Jolla

Re: [SailfishDevel] harbour libs survey

Hi Damien, Thanks for already doing that, I must admit I only login to TJC every once in a while so had not noticed it but was wondering how to go about this "poll". Maybe this should be postponed to the meeting after the next to give more people time to respond? Thanks again! Eli Op zo 22 sep. 20

Re: [SailfishDevel] harbour libs survey

Hello Eli, Le dimanche 22 septembre 2019, E.S. Rosenberg a écrit : > At last weeks SFOS community meeting one of the things that came up > was libraries/APIs that are as of yet not supported and that we (the > community members) would like to see in harbour (or at least see a > blocking bug list f

[SailfishDevel] harbour libs survey

Hi All, At last weeks SFOS community meeting one of the things that came up was libraries/APIs that are as of yet not supported and that we (the community members) would like to see in harbour (or at least see a blocking bug list for). What would be the best way to do this? A "question" on TJC wit

Re: [SailfishDevel] Harbour validator bug again -- now it doesn't accept my i486 rpm

Hi Tamas, What's the situation regarding your package? Did you manage to get it to harbour? Have you tried again?  -Ville On 25.7.2019 0.38, Tamas Miklos wrote: Hi, It seems the validator is acting up again... Now it says: "1. RPM-validation can not be done: ERROR [/home/mersdk/.cache/sdk

[SailfishDevel] Harbour validator bug again -- now it doesn't accept my i486 rpm

Hi, It seems the validator is acting up again... Now it says: "1. RPM-validation can not be done: ERROR [/home/mersdk/.cache/sdk-webapp/harbour-aida64-2.0.2-16.i486.rpm] Invalid RPM file! https://harbour.jolla.com/faq#9.1.0"; While the SFOS SDK can validate the rpm just fine. What to do in s

Re: [SailfishDevel] Harbour validator bug? RPM validation fails on QtSensors 5.2

Thank you, I've resubmitted the app. Fingers crossed :) Regards, Tamas -Original Message- From: Tamas Miklos Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2019 1:37 PM To: 'devel@lists.sailfishos.org' Subject: Harbour validator bug? RPM validation fails on QtSensors 5.2 Hi, I've tried to submit an app

Re: [SailfishDevel] Harbour validator bug? RPM validation fails on QtSensors 5.2

Hi Tamas, The issue with RPM validation inside SDK is now under investigation. Please try to submit you app to the Harbour again - the failure there might be related to https://together.jolla.com/ question/206727 which was fixed recently and so possibly fixed as well. BR, Martin _

[SailfishDevel] Harbour validator bug? RPM validation fails on QtSensors 5.2

Hi, I've tried to submit an app update to the Harbour a few hours ago, but it is already showing up as RPM validation failure. I've checked it with the SDK RPM Validator and it says Import 'QtSensors 5.2' is not allowed. I've checked the following page, and that API should still be available:

Re: [SailfishDevel] Harbour compatibility - including multiple executables in a single RPM

Hi Martin, On 02/06/18 02:05, Martin Kolman wrote: > Fri, 1 Jun 2018 09:53:10 +0100 David Llewellyn-jones: >> On 01/06/18 09:07, rinigus wrote: [snip - discussion about multiple executables in a Harbour package] >>> >>> I understand, its a sport in the beginning. There is a simpler solution >>>

Re: [SailfishDevel] Harbour compatibility - including multiple executables in a single RPM

Fri, 1 Jun 2018 09:53:10 +0100 David Llewellyn-jones: On 01/06/18 09:07, rinigus wrote: Hi David, > the rules regarding single executable haven't changed, to my knowledge. I actually can't see anything in the rules that states you can't have multiple executables, but it is a req

Re: [SailfishDevel] Harbour compatibility - including multiple executables in a single RPM

On 01/06/18 09:07, rinigus wrote: > Hi David, > > > the rules regarding single executable haven't changed, to my knowledge. > > I actually can't see anything in the rules that states you can't have > multiple executables, but it is a requirement to pass through the > rpmvalidator.

Re: [SailfishDevel] Harbour compatibility - including multiple executables in a single RPM

Hi David, > the rules regarding single executable haven't changed, to my knowledge. > > I actually can't see anything in the rules that states you can't have > multiple executables, but it is a requirement to pass through the > rpmvalidator. If it's a requirement, I'm thinking it would be helpful

Re: [SailfishDevel] Harbour compatibility - including multiple executables in a single RPM

Hi Ringus, On 14/05/18 19:52, rinigus wrote: > Hi David, > > the rules regarding single executable haven't changed, to my knowledge. I actually can't see anything in the rules that states you can't have multiple executables, but it is a requirement to pass through the rpmvalidator. If it's a req

Re: [SailfishDevel] Harbour compatibility - including multiple executables in a single RPM

Hi David, the rules regarding single executable haven't changed, to my knowledge. That particular problem was solved for my case by writing a wrapper and called either QML main or the main I wanted to use from Valhalla ( https://github.com/rinigus/osmscout-server-route/blob/master/src/harbour-osms

[SailfishDevel] Harbour compatibility - including multiple executables in a single RPM

Hi, The Harbour rpmvalidator is currently highlighting problems with my app because it has more than one executable packaged with it. I get errors like this: ERROR [/usr/share/harbour-getiplay/lib/bin/rtmpdump] ELF binary in wrong location (must be /usr/bin/harbour-getiplay) ERROR [/usr/share/ha

Re: [SailfishDevel] harbour : can't upload android apk

I've got it... I have issues with my native SFOS app, too: no issues on tablet, Jolla1, Jolla C, no report from AquaFish, but reported problem on XperiaX, Fairphone and some Oneplus device... Even if version of the OS is the same there could be differences, it seems... ;) On Sunday, January 7,

Re: [SailfishDevel] harbour : can't upload android apk

it's more a problem with unity3d's android export than Jolla. If I force opengl2.0, render work on JollaC but I got a black scene on XperiaX. If I force Opengl3.0, it's now ok on XperiaX (on latest android device too) but I got a green overlay on JollaC. Lots of problem to create android export wi

Re: [SailfishDevel] harbour : can't upload android apk

Hi, What do you mean by 'works on XperiaX or Jolla C but not on both'? Thx, Zoltan On Friday, January 5, 2018, jerome levreau wrote: > thanks oleg. > now it's working, well except my build on unity works on xperia or jolla c > but not both, but that a different matter. > > 2018-01-04 12:45 GMT

Re: [SailfishDevel] harbour : can't upload android apk

thanks oleg. now it's working, well except my build on unity works on xperia or jolla c but not both, but that a different matter. 2018-01-04 12:45 GMT+01:00 Oleg Linkin : > Try to ask question to developer-c...@jolla.com > > 2018-01-04 14:34 GMT+03:00 jerome levreau > : > >> Hi, >> I try to cre

Re: [SailfishDevel] harbour : can't upload android apk

Try to ask question to developer-c...@jolla.com 2018-01-04 14:34 GMT+03:00 jerome levreau : > Hi, > I try to create a new app to harbour, this time an android app made with > unity but it fail everytime with an error 500, "Sorry, there was an error > processing your request. The administrators h

[SailfishDevel] harbour : can't upload android apk

Hi, I try to create a new app to harbour, this time an android app made with unity but it fail everytime with an error 500, "Sorry, there was an error processing your request. The administrators have been notified" apk is 19.1mb, name com.vostok.cube3d.apk I'm running it directly on the phone by

Re: [SailfishDevel] Harbour compatible background apps?

. > > 25 нояб. 2017 г. 15:24 пользователь "Dylan Van Assche" < > dylan.van.ass...@protonmail.com> написал: > > Hi CODeRUS, > > Oh I didn't know that Screentapshot used this approach, thanks a lot! > > Cheers, > Dylan Van Assche > > > > --

Re: [SailfishDevel] Harbour compatible background apps?

Battery overlay also. 25 нояб. 2017 г. 15:24 пользователь "Dylan Van Assche" < dylan.van.ass...@protonmail.com> написал: Hi CODeRUS, Oh I didn't know that Screentapshot used this approach, thanks a lot! Cheers, Dylan Van Assche Original Message ---- Subjec

Re: [SailfishDevel] Harbour compatible background apps?

Hi CODeRUS, Oh I didn't know that Screentapshot used this approach, thanks a lot! Cheers, Dylan Van Assche > Original Message > Subject: Re: [SailfishDevel] Harbour compatible background apps? > Local Time: 25 November 2017 10:41 AM > UTC Time: 25 November

Re: [SailfishDevel] Harbour compatible background apps?

Hello, yes this is harbour-compatible. For example i have this app published in store: https://github.com/CODeRUS/harbour-screentapshot 2017-11-25 12:34 GMT+03:00 Dylan Van Assche via Devel < devel@lists.sailfishos.org>: > Hi Devs, > > I found a repo from CODeRUS with an example of a background a

[SailfishDevel] Harbour compatible background apps?

Hi Devs, I found a repo from CODeRUS with an example of a background app: https://github.com/CODeRUS/background-application-example/tree/master/src Is this Harbour compatible? The Harbour FAQ allows this AFAIK since it's not a real daemon, it just hides the UI from the screen while that the C++

Re: [SailfishDevel] Harbour error

bject: Re: [SailfishDevel] Harbour error Local Time: March 22, 2017 2:16 PM UTC Time: March 22, 2017 1:16 PM From: pami.ketolai...@jolla.com To: devel@lists.sailfishos.org On 03/16/2017 12:00 PM, Dylan Van Assche via Devel wrote: > Hi devs, > > I tried to upload my latest update of Sailfin

Re: [SailfishDevel] Harbour error

On 03/16/2017 12:00 PM, Dylan Van Assche via Devel wrote: > Hi devs, > > I tried to upload my latest update of Sailfinder to Harbour but I get > this error: > > errorHarbour.png > > I used the same YAML file as before but I added the > nemo-qml-plugin-configuration-qt5 dependency (see attachment

[SailfishDevel] Harbour error

Hi devs, I tried to upload my latest update of Sailfinder to Harbour but I get this error: [errorHarbour.png] I used the same YAML file as before but I added the nemo-qml-plugin-configuration-qt5 dependency (see attachment). The RPM validator in the SDK validates the RPM without any issue. As

[SailfishDevel] Harbour

Heus nauta, what is the current state of the harbour functionalities? I have create an app, harbour published it but I fear the harbour web interface is still incomplete. - The whole process was not very verbose, neither on the accounts email nor on the applications contact detail email I get an

Re: [SailfishDevel] Harbour QA procress

Lauri Johansson kirjoitti ma marraskuuta 30 09:23:54 2015 GMT+0200: > Hello > > Currently Jolla Harbour QA process is really slow, but we do have people > in this area. Please be patient, your applications are going to be checked. > > Best regards > Lauri Johansson > Jolla StoreQA Tester > Tha

[SailfishDevel] Harbour QA procress

Hello Currently Jolla Harbour QA process is really slow, but we do have people in this area. Please be patient, your applications are going to be checked. Best regards Lauri Johansson Jolla StoreQA Tester ___ SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list To uns

Re: [SailfishDevel] Harbour is now open for Tablet applications

2-10.2.i486.rpm will fail to upload in harbour. > > -kimmo > > > -Original Message- > > From: devel-boun...@lists.sailfishos.org [mailto:devel- > > boun...@lists.sailfishos.org] On Behalf Of Developer Care > > Sent: 24. syyskuuta 2015 16:04 > > To:

Re: [SailfishDevel] Harbour is now open for Tablet applications

os.org [mailto:devel- > boun...@lists.sailfishos.org] On Behalf Of Developer Care > Sent: 24. syyskuuta 2015 16:04 > To: devel@lists.sailfishos.org > Subject: [SailfishDevel] Harbour is now open for Tablet applications > > Hello, > > With 1.1.9 software update and our SDK with the ta

[SailfishDevel] Harbour is now open for Tablet applications

Hello, With 1.1.9 software update and our SDK with the tablet emulator being released [1], Harbour QA team is happy to announce that we will be accepting Tablet applications on Harbour from this day forward. We have made submitting tablet applications very simple by adding a 'compatibility' se

Re: [SailfishDevel] Harbour: Allow more libraries to link against

Hi, On 28.12.2013 18:56, Ruediger Gad wrote: Hi, thanks for the reply. It's good to know that this is the right channel and that you are listening. :) Unfortunately, I discovered two more libs some other apps I may try to port would rely on: - libsndfile libsndfile, is now allowed in Harbour

Re: [SailfishDevel] Harbour libssl and libcrypto

On 01/20/2015 11:41 AM, Reto Zingg wrote: > Can you please try again to upload the RPM, it should now work. > > Sorry for any inconveniences, we forgot to add the new allowed libraries > with update 10 too all relevant bits and pieces. So Harbour back-end > didn't know about it. Our admins now upd

Re: [SailfishDevel] Harbour libssl and libcrypto

Hi Jakub, On 19.01.2015 17:35, Reto Zingg wrote: Hi, On 19.01.2015 17:34, Jakub Skokan wrote: On 01/19/2015 04:30 PM, Reto Zingg wrote: On 19.01.2015 17:29, Andrey Kozhevnikov wrote: Also i can't find usage of QCA in your project code. And haveclip-core submodule is set to some private repos

Re: [SailfishDevel] Harbour libssl and libcrypto

Hi, On 19.01.2015 17:34, Jakub Skokan wrote: On 01/19/2015 04:30 PM, Reto Zingg wrote: On 19.01.2015 17:29, Andrey Kozhevnikov wrote: Also i can't find usage of QCA in your project code. And haveclip-core submodule is set to some private repository. Forgot to mention that, it's here: https:

Re: [SailfishDevel] Harbour libssl and libcrypto

On 01/19/2015 04:30 PM, Reto Zingg wrote: > On 19.01.2015 17:29, Andrey Kozhevnikov wrote: >> Also i can't find usage of QCA in your project code. And haveclip-core >> submodule is set to some private repository. Forgot to mention that, it's here: https://github.com/aither64/haveclip-core Only s

Re: [SailfishDevel] Harbour libssl and libcrypto

On 19.01.2015 17:29, Andrey Kozhevnikov wrote: Also i can't find usage of QCA in your project code. And haveclip-core submodule is set to some private repository. yeah that's why I was asking for the resulting RPM :) 19.01.2015 20:20, Jakub Skokan пишет: Hello, has anyone succeeded in pub

Re: [SailfishDevel] Harbour libssl and libcrypto

Also i can't find usage of QCA in your project code. And haveclip-core submodule is set to some private repository. 19.01.2015 20:20, Jakub Skokan пишет: Hello, has anyone succeeded in publishing an app requiring libssl in Harbour? Even though the RPM validator tool in Qt Creator says my pack

Re: [SailfishDevel] Harbour libssl and libcrypto

Hi, On 19.01.2015 17:20, Jakub Skokan wrote: Hello, has anyone succeeded in publishing an app requiring libssl in Harbour? Even though the RPM validator tool in Qt Creator says my package is ok, when I try to upload it to Harbour, it fails: No OS version and packages satisfy package requireme

[SailfishDevel] Harbour libssl and libcrypto

Hello, has anyone succeeded in publishing an app requiring libssl in Harbour? Even though the RPM validator tool in Qt Creator says my package is ok, when I try to upload it to Harbour, it fails: No OS version and packages satisfy package requirements: Requirement libcrypto.so.10 not available R

Re: [SailfishDevel] Harbour and QML import

Thankyou all! Read, Fixed, Resubmitted. Michele 2015-01-19 11:34 GMT+01:00 Reto Zingg : > Hi, > > > On 19.01.2015 12:16, Michele Tameni wrote: > >> Hi all, >> I just got an app rejected in the harbour as i have in some QML the >> following line: >> >> >> import it.mupp.core 1.0 >> >> >> where i

Re: [SailfishDevel] Harbour and QML import

Hi, On 19.01.2015 12:16, Michele Tameni wrote: Hi all, I just got an app rejected in the harbour as i have in some QML the following line: import it.mupp.core 1.0 where i registered the type as follow in c++ side. qmlRegisterType("it.mupp.core", 1, 0, "DownloadManager"); Now, I'm not usin

Re: [SailfishDevel] Harbour and QML import

..and use rpm pre-validation tool in SDK tools, either through QtCreator (left toolbar SailfishOs (or Ctrl-5)), or accessing them with external browser at address http://127.0.0.1:8080 -kimmo just rename your extension import to harbour.it.mupp.core and read https://harbour.jolla.com/faq 19.

Re: [SailfishDevel] Harbour and QML import

Is the plugin placed in the expected location? Maybe the pkg validation tool can give you more informatio. best, tortoisedoc On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 12:16 PM, Michele Tameni wrote: > Hi all, > I just got an app rejected in the harbour as i have in some QML the > following line: > > > import it

Re: [SailfishDevel] Harbour and QML import

just rename your extension import to harbour.it.mupp.core and read https://harbour.jolla.com/faq 19.01.2015 15:16, Michele Tameni пишет: Hi all, I just got an app rejected in the harbour as i have in some QML the following line: import it.mupp.core 1.0 where i registered the type as foll

[SailfishDevel] Harbour and QML import

Hi all, I just got an app rejected in the harbour as i have in some QML the following line: import it.mupp.core 1.0 where i registered the type as follow in c++ side. qmlRegisterType("it.mupp.core", 1, 0, "DownloadManager"); Now, I'm not using any not allowed lib, but just trying to use my o

Re: [SailfishDevel] Harbour news

Hi, On 18.12.2013 10:32, dcali...@free.fr wrote: Hello, Selon Iekku Pylkka : 5) New APIs are approved as we go along - we'll inform you when you're allowed to use new APIs in Harbour apps on the mailing list. If you think you need an API (library or QML import) for your Harbour app that is not

Re: [SailfishDevel] Harbour news

Hi, On 18.12.2013 10:32, dcali...@free.fr wrote: Hello, Selon Iekku Pylkka : 5) New APIs are approved as we go along - we'll inform you when you're allowed to use new APIs in Harbour apps on the mailing list. If you think you need an API (library or QML import) for your Harbour app that is not

Re: [SailfishDevel] Harbour: Allow more libraries to link against

Hi, On 27.12.2013 18:48, Ruediger Gad wrote: Hi, two of my apps (MeePasswords and Q To-Do) are being rejected because they are linked against libraries that are not "allowed". I read the according FAQ at https://harbour.jolla.com/faq and understand your motivation for being so restrictive. How

Re: [SailfishDevel] Harbour should allow libcrypt/openssl

Hi, On 07.12.2013 21:37, Mikael Hermansson wrote: I think harbour store should allow libcrypt/openssl because AFAIK that API will not change very often and is probadly already used in sailfishos? as mentioned in several places before. Harbour QA started on 07. Jan 2015 to accept submissions

[SailfishDevel] Harbour & Jolla Developer Care delays during holiday season

Hi, The holiday season is ahead and as we did last year[0] we will also this year reduce our workforce which is handling the Harbour intake queue. So that our laborious testers can take some well-deserved days off. Harbour testing will be back in full force on 07. Jan 2015. So expect delays on

[SailfishDevel] Harbour QA's estimated testing time changed temporarily

Ahoy, Our Harbour QA takes longer now since we are testing incoming apps with both Tahkalampi and Uitukka. Therefor we can't promise to have your application tested within 48 hours. We are currently targeting to get apps tested within 72 hours (weekends not included), hopefully soon back in 48

Re: [SailfishDevel] Harbour rules: request loading libraries from own folders, do not impose rules on the *source code*

On Thursday 27 February 2014 22:21 Martin Kolman wrote: > 27.2.2014 22:10, Artem Marchenko: > > - Let's not mandate the source code to use particular import form > > > > - You can still keep the warning as information for the developer > > > > and alert for the Harbour tester to check that thi

Re: [SailfishDevel] Harbour rules: request loading libraries from own folders, do not impose rules on the *source code*

27.2.2014 22:10, Artem Marchenko: Hi all As you know harbour rules regarding custom libraries and QML modules require two things: 1. Load everything from your app folder 2. In your QML import stuff as "import harbour.mycoolapp.desiredmodule" Rule 1 makes sense for limiting dependency on the s

[SailfishDevel] Harbour rules: request loading libraries from own folders, do not impose rules on the *source code*

Hi all As you know harbour rules regarding custom libraries and QML modules require two things: 1. Load everything from your app folder 2. In your QML import stuff as "import harbour.mycoolapp.desiredmodule" Rule 1 makes sense for limiting dependency on the system, but rule 2.. Following it needs

Re: [SailfishDevel] Harbour reject because of too high power consumption

if you mean tinybrowser maybe but not sure tiny is needed anymore since we now have portrait in sailfish-browser and its open. Only reason I wrote tiny was missing portrait.. So I see that project as dead now. But I would say geecko engine from sailfish-browser would be great in jolla2gether c

Re: [SailfishDevel] Harbour reject because of too high power consumption

Thanks Mikael, That must be it. The response from Harbour was very short, the whole response message was pasted in my email above. Br -Samuli 2014-02-18 21:17 GMT+02:00 Andrey Kozhevnikov : > Isn't better to fork jolla browser? :) > > On 19.02.2014 01:16, Mikael Hermansson wrote: > > when I d

Re: [SailfishDevel] Harbour reject because of too high power consumption

Isn't better to fork jolla browser? :) On 19.02.2014 01:16, Mikael Hermansson wrote: when I did upload the tinywebbrowser(before I started on unnoficialtogetherapp) it was cause of webkit eating to much CPU when app is minimized. Wasn't this what they said for u too? AFAIK there is no solut

Re: [SailfishDevel] Harbour reject because of too high power consumption

when I did upload the tinywebbrowser(before I started on unnoficialtogetherapp) it was cause of webkit eating to much CPU when app is minimized. Wasn't this what they said for u too? AFAIK there is no soluton for it except pop webkit page when app minimized. maybe in future better use Gecko pl

[SailfishDevel] Harbour reject because of too high power consumption

Hi, I got app rejected with a message: "sorry for rejecting your application, but there is too high power consumption, if there is some Question/Question list open. If application is in main menu, power consumption is ok. You can check power consumption by yourself, plase take a look here: https:

Re: [SailfishDevel] Harbour compliant way to read contacts

Hi, I am just wondering why there was the idea "hey, let's do some bondage and use the Google API" (or Facebook or...) instead of using CardDav and CalDav from the beginning. Shouldn't that have been the natural choice for an more or less open phone? Nevertheless I will be happy when the alter

Re: [SailfishDevel] Harbour compliant way to read contacts

@Martin: And which statement in the TOS of, let's take, Google does it? I didn't notice it (or maybe it's a fairly new statement) -- Marcin 2014-01-27 Jarkko Lietolahti > Hi, > This might shed some infromation about this issue: > http://techcrunch.com/2010/11/04/facebook-google-contacts/# > >

Re: [SailfishDevel] Harbour compliant way to read contacts

Hi, This might shed some infromation about this issue: http://techcrunch.com/2010/11/04/facebook-google-contacts/# On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 2:48 AM, Thomas Tanghus wrote: > On Sunday 26 January 2014 20:48 Bernd Wachter wrote: > > Our plans for contacts are to first make all local contacts avail

Re: [SailfishDevel] Harbour compliant way to read contacts

On Sunday 26 January 2014 20:48 Bernd Wachter wrote: > Our plans for contacts are to first make all local contacts available to > your applications, and then fine-tune how we're dealing with contacts > from 3rd party services. Sounds like a reasonable approach. You shouldn't be blocked from your

Re: [SailfishDevel] Harbour compliant way to read contacts

Gabriel Böhme writes: > So Jolla get's punishment, because a user want's to use HIS Contacts, > because they are fetched from 3rd party service, the user put HIS > contacts?! - Wow strange. Technically it's app access, but obviously it boils down to some services not wanting you to freely do wi

Re: [SailfishDevel] Harbour compliant way to read contacts

2014-01-26, Gabriel Böhme : > So Jolla get's punishment, because a user want's to use HIS Contacts, > because they are fetched from 3rd party service, the user put HIS > contacts?! - Wow strange. What makes you think that the contacts you sync from a 3rd party service are still YOUR contacts? Have

Re: [SailfishDevel] Harbour compliant way to read contacts

So Jolla get's punishment, because a user want's to use HIS Contacts, because they are fetched from 3rd party service, the user put HIS contacts?! - Wow strange. But making "added by hand" contacts is/could be possible? And what about if the user have to accept that a app wants to use his contact

Re: [SailfishDevel] Harbour compliant way to read contacts

issue not in app permissions. issue in restriction access to "cloud" contacts got from 3rd party services, and so on On 27.01.2014 00:21, Marcin M. wrote: And wouldn't separate permission for each app solve the thing? -- Marcin 2014-01-26 Bernd Wachter >

Re: [SailfishDevel] Harbour compliant way to read contacts

And wouldn't separate permission for each app solve the thing? -- Marcin 2014-01-26 Bernd Wachter > writes: > > > Hi Sven > > > > I am equally curious: > > > > Reading and rereading Bernd's mail I see > > > > " ..contacts synced to the device from some third party services..." > > > > I entere

Re: [SailfishDevel] Harbour compliant way to read contacts

writes: > Hi Sven > > I am equally curious: > > Reading and rereading Bernd's mail I see > > " ..contacts synced to the device from some third party services..." > > I entered all the contacts on my phone myself (most via bluetooth from > the N9). No third parties are involved at all. So surely m

Re: [SailfishDevel] Harbour compliant way to read contacts

Hi Sven I am equally curious: Reading and rereading Bernd's mail I see " ..contacts synced to the device from some third party services..." I entered all the contacts on my phone myself (most via bluetooth from the N9). No third parties are involved at all. So surely my apps should have fu

Re: [SailfishDevel] Harbour compliant way to read contacts

Hi, could you please shed some light about this issue? What kind of service agreements? Between whom? Was there some hidden hint in the fine print I did not read why I bought the phone? Or to put it in some more provocative way: those contact data is *my* data and *I* want to decide what inform

Re: [SailfishDevel] harbour rejects user files in a Documents subfolder?

ries [wsvr...@xs4all.nl] Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 11:42 AM To: devel@lists.sailfishos.org Subject: Re: [SailfishDevel] harbour rejects user files in a Documents subfolder? Andrey Kozhevnikov schreef op 2014-01-22 10:30: > just use QStandartPath or at least QDir::Home instead of hardcoding > /

Re: [SailfishDevel] harbour rejects user files in a Documents subfolder?

Reto Zingg schreef op 2014-01-22 10:41: Hi, On 22.01.2014 11:29, Wim de Vries wrote: Hi, My checklists app got rejected by harbour again because of user data files :-( . My app creates a checklistdata folder under Documents (one default/example data file is copied there after first start up). H

Re: [SailfishDevel] harbour rejects user files in a Documents subfolder?

Andrey Kozhevnikov schreef op 2014-01-22 10:30: just use QStandartPath or at least QDir::Home instead of hardcoding /home/nemo I use the env.var. "HOME" (which is normally set to "/home/nemo"), and only if that fails it falls back to "/home/nemo On 22.01.2014 15:29, Wim de Vries wrote: Hi

Re: [SailfishDevel] harbour rejects user files in a Documents subfolder?

Hi, On 22.01.2014 11:29, Wim de Vries wrote: Hi, My checklists app got rejected by harbour again because of user data files :-( . My app creates a checklistdata folder under Documents (one default/example data file is copied there after first start up). Harbour doesn't want that: "File creation

Re: [SailfishDevel] harbour rejects user files in a Documents subfolder?

just use QStandartPath or at least QDir::Home instead of hardcoding /home/nemo On 22.01.2014 15:29, Wim de Vries wrote: Hi, My checklists app got rejected by harbour again because of user data files :-( . My app creates a checklistdata folder under Documents (one default/example data file is

[SailfishDevel] harbour rejects user files in a Documents subfolder?

Hi, My checklists app got rejected by harbour again because of user data files :-( . My app creates a checklistdata folder under Documents (one default/example data file is copied there after first start up). Harbour doesn't want that: "File creation in "/home/nemo/Documents/" is not allowed,

Re: [SailfishDevel] Harbour compliant way to read contacts

Harald Schmitt writes: Hi, > I tried to use QContactManager, QContact and so on for an app I'd like > to publish on harbour, but the line in my .pro file > PKGCONFIG += Qt5Contacts > is rejected by the new validation tool. > How can I access contacts in a harbour app? Is there an example? Short

Re: [SailfishDevel] Harbour compliant way to read contacts

Am 21.01.2014 11:28, schrieb Andrey Kozhevnikov: > On 21.01.2014 16:15, Harald Schmitt wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I tried to use QContactManager, QContact and so on for an app I'd like >> to publish on harbour, but the line in my .pro file >> PKGCONFIG += Qt5Contacts >> is rejected by the new validation t

Re: [SailfishDevel] Harbour compliant way to read contacts

is fetching Contacts allowed to Harbour at all? On 21.01.2014 16:15, Harald Schmitt wrote: Hi, I tried to use QContactManager, QContact and so on for an app I'd like to publish on harbour, but the line in my .pro file PKGCONFIG += Qt5Contacts is rejected by the new validation tool. How can I ac

[SailfishDevel] Harbour compliant way to read contacts

Hi, I tried to use QContactManager, QContact and so on for an app I'd like to publish on harbour, but the line in my .pro file PKGCONFIG += Qt5Contacts is rejected by the new validation tool. How can I access contacts in a harbour app? Is there an example? Best regards, Harald ___

Re: [SailfishDevel] Harbour: howto to delete a draft application ?

Hi, On 15.01.2014 11:16, Franck Routier (perso) wrote: Hi, when first playing with harbour, I created an "Untitled" application, before creating the right one. This untitled app is here in the list of my apps, with a draft status, and I can find no way to delete it. How can I do ? please co

[SailfishDevel] Harbour: howto to delete a draft application ?

Hi, when first playing with harbour, I created an "Untitled" application, before creating the right one. This untitled app is here in the list of my apps, with a draft status, and I can find no way to delete it. How can I do ? BR, Franck ___ SailfishOS

Re: [SailfishDevel] Harbour rules and faq

Gabriel Böhme writes: > Ohh nice, I planed to use DBUS for few features, good that I have not > implemented a lot so far. > > Why will DBUS also be restricted? There are just a small amount to nearly > no, save to use APIs. There are nearly no offical APIs, just some Nemo > middle ware stuff that

Re: [SailfishDevel] Harbour rules and faq

Hello, I also have to agree with Gabriel on this one, the polcies for Harbour need to be made much more clearer. At the moment it is not inspiring working of Sailfish development due to the store issues. I would expect that Jolla would indeed need as many developers as only possible onboard,

Re: [SailfishDevel] Harbour rules and faq

Ohh nice, I planed to use DBUS for few features, good that I have not implemented a lot so far. Why will DBUS also be restricted? There are just a small amount to nearly no, save to use APIs. There are nearly no offical APIs, just some Nemo middle ware stuff that works - maybe, but is not allowed

[SailfishDevel] Harbour rules and faq

Hi there, habour supporters and moderators. Please, please, really PLEASE do update your https://harbour.jolla.com/faqAND MAKE CLEAN RULES what is restricted and what is not. This is not the game where we should guess your imaginary rules. This is just ridiculous to submit apps, wait for 4 days

  1   2   >