Isn't better to fork jolla browser? :)
On 19.02.2014 01:16, Mikael Hermansson wrote:
when I did upload the tinywebbrowser(before I started on
unnoficialtogetherapp) it was cause of webkit eating to much CPU when
app is minimized.
Wasn't this what they said for u too?
AFAIK there is no soluton for it except pop webkit page when app
minimized.
maybe in future better use Gecko plugin instead of webkit when store
allows that engine?
Regards
Mike7b4
On Tuesday 18 February 2014 20.54.16 Samuli Silvius wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I got app rejected with a message:
>
> "sorry for rejecting your application, but there is too high power
> consumption, if there is some Question/Question list open. If
application
> is in main menu, power consumption is ok.
> You can check power consumption by yourself, plase take a look here:
>
https://together.jolla.com/question/13243/my-app-got-rejected-to-store-becau
> se-of-high-power-consumption-how-to-debug-problems/ "
>
> First of all,it would be nice to have possibility to answer/ask in the
> harbour itself, or what is the correct channel? This email list?
>
> The app (https://github.com/tace/jolla2gether) is pure
qml/javascript, so
> what could be power consuming part there, any hints?
>
> I tried to measure it with powertop tool but did not get any alarming
> results. Or then I don't know how to use the powertop. I used with
command:
> *% powertop --html=powertop_report.html --time=120*
> 3 times. Before app was open and 2 times with app open in different
views.
> What values I should follow? At least max "Wakeups/s" I got was 5.0.
>
> Br
> -Samuli
--
Skickat från Lenovo Thinkpad X230 running Kubuntu desktop
_______________________________________________
SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list
_______________________________________________
SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list
