Re: [SailfishDevel] Commandline parameters with icon

2018-10-22 Thread deloptes
dep wrote: > And you're right about changing the subject in the middle of a topic -- > I've changed the subject line above so anybody looking for this > information will be able to more easily find it. Hi dep, I think we know each other from the debian user list, but what Leszek Lesner is saying

[SailfishDevel] Commandline parameters with icon

2018-10-22 Thread dep
said Leszek Lesner: | Am Montag, 22. Oktober 2018, 19:53:40 CEST schrieb dep: | > While I'm here -- is there any mechanism for easily passing | > commandline parameters to an application and giving that application, | > with the parameters, an icon? | |   | If you mean to just create an Icon for an

Re: [SailfishDevel] A probably stupid question

2018-10-22 Thread Leszek Lesner
Am Montag, 22. Oktober 2018, 19:53:40 CEST schrieb dep: > While I'm here -- is there any mechanism for easily passing commandline > parameters to an application and giving that application, with the > parameters, an icon? If you mean to just create an Icon for an already existing application but w

Re: [SailfishDevel] A probably stupid question

2018-10-22 Thread Dylan Van Assche via Devel
Hi, Thanks! Leszek does most of the work on Youtube :) I keep myself busy with Tinder, Facebook, ... clients :) From what I experienced with Sailbook, a webapp for Facebook, QtWebkit is way out of date. Leszek's update makes it a bit better but Facebook is still a PITA. I gave up a couple months

Re: [SailfishDevel] A probably stupid question

2018-10-22 Thread dep
Thanks, Leszek and Dylan (I enjoy both of your YouTube work, btw, and have learned from it). I'd wondered if it would be foolish to try anything before SFOS 3, given the amount of stuff that seems to have gotten broken between even minor upgrades in the past. It seems as if waiting is the smart

Re: [SailfishDevel] A probably stupid question

2018-10-22 Thread Dylan Van Assche via Devel
I'm also a Protonmail user, I tried this in the past but I wasn't able to achieve this goal. Currently, I'm a bit busy but I am hoping on QtWebEngine for SFOS. If we have that available at our disposal, a Protonmail webapp would be doable with notifications and stuff I think. Chromium support we

Re: [SailfishDevel] A probably stupid question

2018-10-22 Thread Leszek Lesner
Upps. Part 2 (accidentally pressed send) Am Montag, 22. Oktober 2018, 19:27:07 CEST schrieb dep: > I'd hope to add notifications, preferably via daemon in > the same way that we can get texts without the Messages app being open, > and a proper download path for attachments and such That is hard

Re: [SailfishDevel] A probably stupid question

2018-10-22 Thread Leszek Lesner
Hi, Am Montag, 22. Oktober 2018, 19:27:07 CEST schrieb dep: > I think it needs to be > gecko-based because while I can log in to the ProtonMail webmail page via > the Jolla browser, I can't with either Web Pirate or Webcat. Have you tried installing the QtWebkit 5.212 packages I provide on openre

[SailfishDevel] A probably stupid question

2018-10-22 Thread dep
Hi, everybody . . . A few days ago I posted here looking for a webapp framework, and I'm starting to think I asked the wrong question. I think I'm looking for source for the most basic of web browsers, that can be modified to become a ProtonMail application. I think it needs to be gecko-based

Re: [SailfishDevel] is there any existing webapp framework?

2018-10-22 Thread dep
said szo...@gmail.com: | If someone has the x86 binary upload it somewhere (unless it is | personalized per client) it can be run in text mode so maybe qemu could | work on the phone I have it but think that would be mighty rickety. And one can use the ProtonMail webmail portal in the Sailfish B

Re: [SailfishDevel] is there any existing webapp framework?

2018-10-22 Thread szopin
If someone has the x86 binary upload it somewhere (unless it is personalized per client) it can be run in text mode so maybe qemu could work on the phone On Monday, 22 October 2018, Gerd wrote: > Which, as mentioned before, is not available for the ARM platform and > the source code is not availa

Re: [SailfishDevel] is there any existing webapp framework?

2018-10-22 Thread Gerd
Which, as mentioned before, is not available for the ARM platform and the source code is not available. On 2018/10/22 7:58 PM, Tone Kastlunger wrote: > Ah but but : > https://protonmail.com/bridge/install > They have a  linux beta. > > On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 2:57 PM Tone Kastlunger > mailto:users

Re: [SailfishDevel] is there any existing webapp framework?

2018-10-22 Thread Tone Kastlunger
Ah but but : https://protonmail.com/bridge/install They have a linux beta. On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 2:57 PM Tone Kastlunger wrote: > Given they provide it for paying customers, > it probably makes them believe not to fit their business model. > > https://protonmail.com/bridge/ > > I think this

Re: [SailfishDevel] is there any existing webapp framework?

2018-10-22 Thread Tone Kastlunger
Given they provide it for paying customers, it probably makes them believe not to fit their business model. https://protonmail.com/bridge/ I think this is just a 90's mentality towards software. *OR* they do not have infrastructure to support all the (eventual) clients. On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at