On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Matthew Garrett wrote:
>> Debian policy is that any virtual dependencies must also have an
>> explicit dependency. In your case it would be something like
>>
>> Requires: phonon-backend-gstreamer | phonon-backend
>
> Unfortunately, RPM does no
>> * What if there are two layers of users that need to be rebuilt?
>>
>> The delays just pile one upon another...
>
> You can update rawhide at any time and accomplish that work without
> delays. Then it shows up in the next Fedora version.
>
Yes, but then we have align the schedules, so have a
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky
wrote:
> Excerpts from Richard Shaw's message of Thu Oct 06 22:17:51 +0200 2011:
>> After some initial interest there doesn't appear to be any activity
>> unless I'm missing something.
>>
>> I am still interested. Anyone else?
>
> Sorry for tak
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 8:39 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-10-07 at 17:49 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> On 10/07/2011 02:49 PM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
>>
>> > I know a lot of people wanted to have a discussion about this first,
>> > but since we had the opportunity to hack on thi
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi
>
> The following have been orphaned by leigh123linux. Sending on his
> behalf since his is not subscribed to this list
>
> libdesktop-agnostic, avant-window-navigator, awn-applets-extras,
> gmixer, torium and html2text
>
> Rahul
> --
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 7:42 AM, tim.laurid...@gmail.com <
tim.laurid...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> The following have been orphaned by leigh123linux. Sending on his
>> behal
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 8:11 PM, Jeffrey Ness wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> As I'm new to the community and RPM Package Review (and development), I
> figured a tool to assist with reviews would be a nice time saver.
>
> With that said I have a simple Python tool (still in early beta stages)
> which
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 12:58 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 03:10:01PM -0400, Eric Mesa wrote:
>
> >I see. So what would I need to do to enable it? Recompile the
> kernel?
> > Drop a file somewhere?
>
> There may be a kmod for it in rpmfusion? If not you'll need to
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 8:55 PM, Matej Cepl wrote:
> Dne 26.4.2011 18:23, Florian Festi napsal(a):
> > I think if anybody can come up with a exact description how they should
> > look like and how they should work and can create some evidence that
> > this is want we need and want implementing th
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 7:59 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Ron Yorston wrote:
> > I'd prefer them to be in one package: they are intended to work
> > together.
>
> Except the Shut Down menu extension directly conflicts with the
> alternative-status-menu extension. Sub-packages are the safest be
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 7:01 PM, Michael Wiktowy
wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
> >> If this is under way, could extension makers be pointed towards it to
> >> future-proof their extensions.
> >
> > I'm not sure what you mean by this.
>
> Searching around now, it lo
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:37 AM, Dave Jones wrote:
>
> Why are people choosing it over other solutions, and what can we change
> in qemu/kvm to get users using that instead ?
>
>
I use Virtualbox on a laptop with Fedora 14 as host OS, I use for building
and test installation of Windows applicati
Hi
I have a number of packages under review, they should be very easy to review
712560 Review Request: gnome-shell-extension-theme-selector -
extension for review & change gnome-shell themes
712561 Review Request: gnome-shell-theme-atolm - the atolm gnome-shell theme
712562 Review Request: gnome-
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> My only concern is that there be a command-line replacement available. I
> currently fetch my ISOs with bittorrent-curses and screen. Can someone
> with experience with any of them offer a recommendation? Python, C and
> C++ clients especiall
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 1:13 PM, He Rui wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 12:00 +, devel-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> wrote:
>> Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 11:15:15 +0800
>> From: He Rui
>> Subject: Package Review Needed
>> To: devel
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>>
>> Greetings!
With a little sadless I has to orhan avant-windows-navigator,
awn-extras-applet and libdesktop-agnostic for fedora-devel (fedora-17)
The avant-windows-navigator package don't build in rawhide because of
changes in latest version of vala
The awn-extras-applet has lot of problems with gnome 2.x depe
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been working on packaging lcd4linux (to use together with the digital
> picture frames I also wrote a libgphoto driver for a while ago).
>
> The packaging is complete and now I'm looking for reviewers for the
> following 3 packa
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 1:57 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been pointed to a news item about a (apparently the first) x86 (Atom)
> based smartphone:
> http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/14/orange-san-diego-review/
>
> So even smartphones are going x86 now. It looks like x86 is going to defea
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 9:15 AM, drago01 wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 6:42 AM, tim.laurid...@gmail.com
> wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > Linux is about choices
>
> No it isn't:
> http://www.redhat.com/archives/rhl-devel-list/2008-January/msg008
Would it not be better to work with yum upstream to make the current yum
depsolver more modular so you could plugin another libsolv based depsolver,
instead of making a fork of yum and starts trashing the current API. There
is a lot more to yum, that just solving dependencies. And making a fork
the
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Damian Ivanov wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> awn has been orphaned in F17 because latest bzr fails to build
> (0.4.1-XXX), though latest stable (0.4.0) builds fine. see
>
> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=avant-window-navigator&project=home%3Adamianator%3
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 11:04 PM, Rave it wrote:
> >
> > Rex Dieter wrote:
> >
> > I can understand your frustration, and that you and Dan had trouble
> > communicating and working together.
> >
> > I do wish to thank you for the positive contributions you made, and in
> > your future endeavors.
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Henrique Junior wrote:
> Currently several packages in epel6 are facing the problem that Fedora is
> now systemd based and therefore many RPMs can not be created for EL6 and
> EL5.
> Can a maintainer use, lets say, two spec files (one for Fedora and another
> for E
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Jiri Eischmann wrote:
> Hi,
> the possibility of Software Center in Fedora has already been discussed
> several times, last time a few month ago.
> I read an article about a successful Google Summer of Code project [1]
> whose goal was to make Software Center a dis
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> So you make your system incompatible with every other Linux distro out
> there, and with all existing documentation, but to what end? Tidyness?
>
> Rich.
>
> --
> Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat
> http://people.redhat.com/~rj
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 5:41 AM, Dario Lesca wrote:
> On this Asus EeePC seashell series Notebook:
> http://www.smolts.org/client/show/pub_e9f34fbb-dd9d-4b7d-8c77-027292c81297
>
> After kernel update to 3.6.[12] (plus relative kmod-wl* module) the WiFi
> stop work
>
> I have found this article:
>
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 10:58 PM, David Airlie wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Richard Hughes"
> > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" <
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> > Sent: Wednesday, 31 October, 2012 6:35:14 AM
> > Subject: Re: Anaconda is totally trashin
Sound very strange, it is not some kind orphan package, there have been out
of Fedora and has to re-enter.
It it an active maintained package in F17, there just have not worked with
latest version for gnome-shell, because they change the way themes works in
every release.
It a waste of reviewers ti
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Alec Leamas wrote:
> No top-posting in fedora-devel :)
>
>
Sorry :)
> Besides that, I can just agree with Tim. The oldest package was reviewed
> less than a year ago, the two others last summer. Requiring a new review
> is, well, somewhat formal.
>
> That said,
Did a quick scan and removed internals
random : ['import random : (cli.py)']
subprocess : ['from subprocess import Popen, PIPE :
(yum/packages.py)']
gettext : ['import gettext : (output.py)']
fnmatch : ['import fnmatch : (completion-helper.py)']
te
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 6:53 AM, Ian Pilcher wrote:
> On 11/13/2012 09:50 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> >
> > Yes, this was a misunderstanding. What is still supported is the .policy
> files containing the default policy. And that is very good, since such
> policy files are installed by pretty muc
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Ian Pilcher wrote:
> I've just reviewed those pages, and it's certainly not obvious to me
> how I would go about "porting" a PKLA file.
>
> [libvirt Management Access]
> Identity=unix-group:wheel
> Action=org.libvirt.unix.manage
> ResultAny=no
> ResultIn
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 9:06 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> I was kinda hoping to just let that die a quiet death, but since this
> thread has been thoroughly revived - I would've worded it differently if
> I'd thought about it at all, and I'm sorry for that, it was a silly way
> to put things. That
vlc is not part of fedora, cause of patent related stuff, not a legal
expert, but I dont think fedora cant contain somethng there links to these
kind of applications
If you create a new kind of application metadata, would it not be a good
idea to start using the information we allready have in the
AppData is focusing alot about application, what about content : icons,
themes, backgrounds
Tim
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Sep 2013 11:24:45 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
>
> > In GNOME Software, we show a list of applications for each category
> > that
Hi Ales
How is the state of the Python API, I want to make a DBus API around it to
use with the nextgen Yumex
Like the one i have made for yum[1]
[1] : https://github.com/timlau/yum-daemon
Tim
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 5:02 PM, Ales Kozumplik wrote:
> Hello,
>
> dnf-0.4.2 was released in Fed
the original urlgrabber maintainer left long time ago, but the yum team
adopted the code, because it was critical to yum, so this is cause why
there has been no upstream release.
yum shold make upstream releases in more frequently, instead of adding very
large patches to latest git HEAD.
yum-utils
Is DNF ready for prime time, the is no API at the moment, so it is not
possible to convert tool using the yum api to use a DNF api
I am working on a Python 3 version af yumex, there is package manager for
the XFCE spin, I have isolated all the yum actions in DBUS services, but
they will require yum
Is there some reason that PyQt5 is not in Fedora or has it just not been
packaged yet ?
Tim
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Thanks Rex
Let me know if you need help for package reviews
I will be glad to help
Tim
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
> tim.laurid...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > Is there some reason that PyQt5 is not in Fedora or has it just not been
> > packaged yet ?
>
You can use GDbus as a replacement for python-dbus
You can see how I have done it in the yumdaemon python api.
https://github.com/timlau/yum-daemon/blob/master/client/yumdaemon/__init__.py
Same code is working unchanged in python 2 & 3
Tim
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote
I have made the first public release of yumdaemon a DBUS API for yum with
python 2 & 3 client bindings
It can be helpful for applications moving to python 3 but need to
performing yum actions.
future plans is to make the API work with dnf when there is an api to work
with.
API Docs : http://timlau
Thanks
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 5:58 PM, Jerry James wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 3:05 AM, tim.laurid...@gmail.com
> wrote:
> > I have made the first public release of yumdaemon a DBUS API for yum with
> > python 2 & 3 client bindings
> > It can be helpfu
python3-cairo is a separate package, it contains the latest upstream
release 1.10.0
but it looks like the License is wrong in the .spec (License: MPLv1.1 or
LGPLv2)
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/python3-cairo/sources/spec/
pycairo is licensed under the GNU Lesser General Public License
It is some time ago it was fighting with polkit, but as far is I remember
you have to
make a .policy file to get pkexec to work right
Like this one I use in yumex.
https://github.com/timlau/yumex/blob/master/misc/dk.yumex.backend.policy.in
It should be installed in /usr/share/polkit-1/actions/
45 matches
Mail list logo
