On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Alec Leamas <leamas.a...@gmail.com> wrote:
> No top-posting in fedora-devel :) > > Sorry :) > Besides that, I can just agree with Tim. The oldest package was reviewed > less than a year ago, the two others last summer. Requiring a new review > is, well, somewhat formal. > > That said, it should be easy to review these to resolve this issue. If > you just make some new review requests, linking to the previous review I'll > guess this could be handled without to much problems. > I don't see anywhere in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process That a new review is needed, "Reviews are currently done for totally new packages, package renames<http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Renaming_Process#Re-review_required>, and packages merged from the old Fedora Core repository." I don't see this case, fits any of the cases. Tim
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
