On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 7:01 PM, Michael Wiktowy <michael.wikt...@gmail.com>wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Colin Walters <walt...@verbum.org> wrote: > >> If this is under way, could extension makers be pointed towards it to > >> future-proof their extensions. > > > > I'm not sure what you mean by this. > > Searching around now, it looks like Looking Glass (alt+f2 "lg") > already registers the extensions so maybe not much else needs to be > done in the extensions to take advantage of future enhancements to > extension management. > > Also, wrt. yum as the existing manager for now, is there some policy > on one extension per package, package naming, configuration formats, > etc.? Right now, a lot of extensions are only available via > instructions to just git clone development trees right into your > extension directories which is bypassing a lot of review, auditing, > and sanity processes. Is there anyone shepherding these into sane and > consistent rpm packages? > > /Mike > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > The latest version of gnome-tweak-tool can enable/disable installed extentions http://timlau.fedorapeople.org/files/pics/tweek-tool.png Tim
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
