Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2015-07-08)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2015-07-08 18:00 UTC' Links to all tickets belo

Summary/Minutes for today's FESCo meeting (2015-07-08)

=== #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2015-07-08) === Meeting started by paragan at 18:00:02 UTC. The full logs are available athttp://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2015-07-08/fesco.2015-07-08-18.00.log.html . Meeting summary ---

Re: F23 Self Contained Change: io.js Technology Preview

Hi, On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 2:47 AM, T.C. Hollingsworth < tchollingswo...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Stephen Gallagher > wrote: > > So this was discussed at today's FESCo meeting[1]. Basically, we're not > > sure that it makes sense to have both interpreters in the distr

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] FTBFS Packages in rawhide (2015-07-13)

Hi, On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 4:10 AM, wrote: > The following packages did not build for two releases and will be > retired before the Alpha Freeze, unless someone takes care of them. If you > know > for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper > reason: > https://fe

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] FTBFS Packages in rawhide (2015-07-13)

Hi, On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 8:15 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Dne 14.7.2015 v 00:40 opensou...@till.name napsal(a): > > > > Package(co)maintainers Status > Change > > > === > > rubygem-rgen

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] FTBFS Packages in rawhide (2015-07-13)

On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 2:41 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Wed, 15 Jul 2015 21:53:46 +0200, Till Maas wrote: > > > > The email is hard to understand. It seems it looks at a dependency tree > > > and somehow lists any leaf package maintainers in an unsorted list of > > > dependencies. > > > > W

Re: Improving our processes for new contributors.

Hi, On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 6:14 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Dne 11.7.2015 v 23:38 Jonathan Underwood napsal(a): > > Thoughts from the COPR folks? > > I like the idea of adding Copr as intermediate step for new contributors. > Copr is outer ring of Fedora and it definitely > make sense for newbi

Re: F-23 Branched report: 20150720 changes

Hi, On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Milan Crha wrote: > On Wed, 2015-07-22 at 06:48 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: > > Furthermore, I run my rawhide machine today and tried `dnf update`, > > which didn't offer me the update of the evolution-data-server. I'd > > expect to have it offered after two da

Review swap

Hi, I have submitted a python package for review python-os-client-config, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247177 Appreciate if someone can review it and I can review your package :) Regards, Parag -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/m

Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2015-08-05)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2015-08-05 18:00 UTC' Links to all tickets belo

Summary/Minutes for today's FESCo meeting (2015-08-05)

=== #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2015-08-05) === Meeting started by paragan at 18:00:09 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2015-08-05/fesco.2015-08-05-18.00.log.html . Meeting summary --

Re: Sponsors - who does (not) work on FE-NEEDSPONSOR tickets

Hi, On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 12:43 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Recently we had discussion here about the queue of package reviews with > FE-NEEDSPONSOR flag. > I suggested to write some script which would query db and reveal those > sponsors who does not make his duty. > > Here comes this script:

Re: Sponsors - who does (not) work on FE-NEEDSPONSOR tickets

On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 2:35 PM, Parag Nemade wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 12:43 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: >> Recently we had discussion here about the queue of package reviews with >> FE-NEEDSPONSOR flag. >> I suggested to write some script which woul

Re: Sponsors - who does (not) work on FE-NEEDSPONSOR tickets

On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 6:48 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 9:07 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: >> Dne 17.8.2015 v 14:47 Josh Boyer napsal(a): >>> I would recommend removing all of the above people from the sponsors group. >> >> -1 >> There is nothing wrong on being inactive. At least

Re: Unable to submit update for F22 (was Re: bodhi 2 now live)

Hi, On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 11:03 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 08/21/2015 06:02 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> >> On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 05:27:37 +0200 >> Ralf Corsepius wrote: >> >>> Upstreams, yes, but not Fedora. Fedora should be self-hosted. >> >> >> Can you please define "Fedora" and "self-hosted

Re: bodhi 2 now live

Hi, On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Richard Marko wrote: > On 08/20/2015 05:45 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> Greetings. >> >> After a longer than expected outage window, I'm happy to report that >> bodhi2 is now live in production at >> >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates >> or >> https://bod

Re: Can't push update to stable

Hi, On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 8:32 AM, Jerry James wrote: > I tried this morning and tonight to push this update to stable: > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-14375 > > Both times, bodhi told me that this update has not yet met the minimum > testing requirements defined in the P

Re: Help with a font package

Hi, On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 8:43 AM, Jerry James wrote: > I've got a package that has started bundling a font, namely Roboto > Slab. I'd like to do things the right way and make this a separate > package, but I've never done a font package before and could use a > little hand holding. > > The ho

Re: Removing packages that have broken dependencies in F23 tree

Hi Ralph, On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 9:12 PM, Ralph Bean wrote: > On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 04:34:11PM +0200, Kalev Lember wrote: >> nodejs-grunt-contrib-copy ralph This package is missing needed dependency npm(file-sync-cmp) to be packaged in Fedora. >> nodejs-grunt-saucelabs ralph, piotrp This p

Re: Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo meeting (2015-03-04)

Hi, On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 1:52 AM, Adam Jackson wrote: > Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo > meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. > > To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto >

Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2015-03-25)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2015-03-25 18:00 UTC' Links to all tickets belo

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2015-03-25)

=== #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2015-03-25) === Meeting started by paragan at 18:00:02 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2015-03-25/fesco.2015-03-25-18.00.log.html . Meeting summary --

Re: dnf replacing yum and dnf-yum

Hi, On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Jiří Konečný wrote: > On Wed, 2015-04-01 at 13:40 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> There's some confusion around this, so I thought I would post to try >> and clear up things. In the event I am wrong on any of the below, please >> do feel free to correct me. ;) >>

Re: yumdownloader vs dnf??????

Hi, On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 8:49 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: > I'm not volunteering! > > ...but perhaps a yum->dnf transition guide on the Fedora wiki would be nice > which would cover things like this. Since dnf development started, its developers have kept the documentation also updated. You can f

Re: Getting changes from new RC builds to previous ones

Hi, On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 10:41 AM, Sumit Bhardwaj wrote: > Hi All, > > I have switched to Fedora 22 Workstation yesterday, fresh install using RC1 > ISO. Everything is working well. > > However, today I noticed RC2 build is up. But since final freeze in effect, > I got no updates when checked

Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2015-06-10)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2015-06-10 18:00 UTC' Links to all tickets belo

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2015-06-10)

=== #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2015-06-10) === Meeting started by paragan at 18:00:02 UTC. The full logs are available athttp://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2015-06-10/fesco.2015-06-10-18.00.log.html . Meeting summary ---

Re: Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2015-06-24)

Hi all, On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 9:13 PM, Tomas Hozza wrote: > Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo > meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. > > To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHow

Re: FESCO Elections - June 2015 - Results

appened last week so many people in APAC were busy for this event. Also we need more promotion on Fedora Planet or Fedora Magazine when voting opens then maybe 2 or 1 days remaining post for voting to end. I was busy last week so not sure if someone posted about FESCo voting period there.

Orphaning my nodejs packages

Hi all, As you know many nodejs packages have been removed recently but that has created dependency issues. I maintain a few nodejs packages in Fedora but those I added a few years back to learn nodejs packaging. As more and more packages per release are getting retired it has become difficult for

new package SCM requests change

Hi, I was asked to follow "This SCM request method has been deprecated. Please see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageDB_admin_requests"; on one of my new package review bug. I want to know is this process announced somewhere? This has been asked on review bug also but as limb never gets c

Re: new package SCM requests change

Hi, On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 6:27 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Wed, 7 Oct 2015 18:23:01 +0530 > Parag Nemade wrote: > >> Hi, >>I was asked to follow "This SCM request method has been deprecated. >> Please see >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageD

Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2015-10-14)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2015-10-14 18:00 UTC' Links to all tickets belo

Summary/Minutes for today's FESCo meeting (2015-10-14)

=== #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2015-10-14) === Meeting started by paragan at 18:01:15 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2015-10-14/fesco.2015-10-14-18.01.log.html . Meeting summary --

Re: Unresponsive maintainer and unupdated package

Hi Chaoyi, On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Chaoyi Zha wrote: > Node.js v0.12 has since become outdated. The page about updating it to 0.12 > for F23 is likely outdated as well by now. We may want to create a new page > if it is needed. > > Here is the latest "LTS" release: > https://nodejs.org/e

Re: Package review skipped and straight to repos?

Hi, On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 3:27 AM, Till Maas wrote: > On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 09:11:48 +, James Hogarth wrote: > >> I was flicking through package review requests to see if anything jumped >> out as interesting when I saw this: >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1280422 >> >>

Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2015-12-02)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2015-12-02 18:00 UTC' Links to all tickets belo

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2015-12-02)

=== #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2015-12-02) === Meeting started by paragan at 18:00:15 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2015-12-02/fesco.2015-12-02-18.00.log.html . Meeting summary --

Re: Bodhi

On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 12:34 PM, Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich wrote: > And now it is locked. I just can't drop it and redone (it is locked) and I > can't do anything (it is locked). > Any ideas? Check this https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Bodhi2#FAQ Regards, Parag. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedo

Re: How to create langpacks for a rpm package?

On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 8:34 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote: > Hi, > > I noticed one of my packages (elfutils libelf) installs a small library > of 90K but also 1MB of .mo locale files. Given that this package will > always be installed because it is on the critical path I thought it > might be nice to sp

redeclipse needs co-maintainers

Hi, The current maintainer has requested[1] that he has no time to work on redeclipse package and requested if any co-maintainers can help this package. Can someone interested in this game package, 9co-maintain this package? Regards, Parag [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1

Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2016-05-27)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Friday at 16:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2016-05-27 16:00 UTC' Links to all tickets below c

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2016-05-27)

=== #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2016-05-27) === Meeting started by paragan at 16:01:04 UTC. The full logs are available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2016-05-27/fesco.2016-05-27-16.01.log.html . Meeting summary -

Re: provenpackager request: fix keepassx for f24

Hi, On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 8:43 AM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > See: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1338054 > > Pushing a reasonable version of keepassx for f24 is apparently an accepted > freeze exception, but it hasn't happened. It would be rather unfortunate if > f24 final was

Re: Changes to the scm-commits list

Hi Kevin, On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 3:08 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Greetings. > > In the past the scm-commits list: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/scm-comm...@lists.fedoraproject.org > > Contained not only git commit messages for packages and notification of > uploads to lookaside c

Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2016-07-01)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Friday at 16:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2016-07-01 16:00 UTC' Links to all tickets below c

Re: Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2016-07-01)

Hi, On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 7:54 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 4:08 AM, Parag Nemade wrote: >> >> #topic #1592 Redefinition of what constitutes a secondary/alternate >> architecture in Fedora >> .fesco 1592 >> https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticke

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2016-07-01)

=== #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2016-07-01) === Meeting started by paragan at 16:01:02 UTC. The full logs are available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2016-07-01/fesco.2016-07-01-16.01.log.html . Meeting summary -

Re: Too fast karma on Bodhi updates

Hi, On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 12:26 PM, Ville Skyttä wrote: > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 9:37 AM, Raphael Groner > wrote: > >> Why is it possible to give +1 to stable packages? Bodhi may deny or at least >> impede such actions, -1 or neutral comments should be still possible though >> for users hav

Re: Too fast karma on Bodhi updates

Hi, On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 2:19 PM, Kamil Paral wrote: >> Any kind of feedback after package gets into updates repository should >> be denied, I can't think of a case where package moves to updates >> repository and bodhi still allows to add comments/karma. Any feedback >> after that can be eith

Re: Package Reviews Statistics

Hi, On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 3:00 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > For me would be better some page with stats/links to weekly status, > monthly status, yearly status and some nice graphics ;) > > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Michal Novotny wrote: >> Hello, >> >> as a new Fedora Infrastructure app

Re: Package Reviews Statistics

Hi, On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 7:05 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 3:18 PM, Raphael Groner > wrote: >> Can that information be used to award badges? There's an old open issue to >> implement badges for doing package reviews. Maybe get in contact with the >> badges team. >> htt

Retired dnf-langpacks in rawhide

Hi, Last release we implemented[1] new way of installing langpacks packages using RPM's weak dependency feature. Therefore, I would like to retire dnf langpacks plugin package called dnf-langpacks in rawhide(f25+). Those who still want to know what is current way of installing language packa

Re: Fedora 25 Mass Branching

Hi, On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > I can't submit update in bodhi as it doesn't look for f25* tags. > > Builds : Invalid tag: scudcloud-1.31-1.fc25 tagged with > [u'f24-updates-candidate', u'f22-updates-candidate', > u'epel7-testing-candidate', u'dist-6E-epel-testing-can

Re: finish retirement of sysvinit-only packages Re: Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2016-07-29)

Hi, On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 10:53 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Sáb, 2016-07-30 at 22:29 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> On Sun, 31 Jul 2016 04:18:18 +0100 >> Sérgio Basto wrote: >> >> > >> > why we need retire sysvinit-only packages ? >> Because they have had 10+ releases to adjust and haven't. >>

Re: Improvements of Fedora Sponsorship process

Hi, On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 1:02 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > I had the talk [1] about Fedora Sponsorship process at Flock. And we had > very interesting follow-up discussion. > > We come up with several improvements, which should be easy to implement and > may improve the process a lot. I am posti

Re: Pending ACLs

Hi, On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 11:07 PM, wrote: > Sometimes a maintainer doesn't want to approve ACLs for "reasons" but > doesn't want to reject the request for various reasons including the > requestor re-request of denied requests. > To add few things here, 1) Why do we need such "Pending ACLs"

Re: Improvements of Fedora Sponsorship process

Hi, On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 1:49 AM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > On 08/05/2016 10:31 AM, Parag Nemade wrote: >>> b) fedora-review is run automatically by some bot/script just after review >>> have been submitted. >> >> Can a new utility be written for this as

Re: Removing aliases on bugzilla

Hi, On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 11:08 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > Hi, > > Probably you've seen some strange activity from me like removing > aliases from old (and new) bugs. > > Actually there is bug in bugzilla which prevents searching by text > which is written in some bug's alias. Unfortunately I d

Re: Unversioned and >/=/>= obsoletes

On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 7:21 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 3:34 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: >> On Fri, 2 Sep 2016 13:14:13 +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote: >> >>> All guidelines mandate the use of >> have some number of packages (179 source rpms -> 292 binary rpms) with >>> unversio

Re: Weak deps in updates

On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 5:56 PM, Christian Stadelmann wrote: > Still not working. > > The only file from updates-testing repo metadata¹ providing "recommends" XML > tags is the > 2b1dda391308bf7395f9890774b4d2d0692b615c2ad6a73fa378080d32c0c531-primary.xml > file, but it just has those tags for 6

Re: Weak deps in updates

On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 7:21 PM, Christian Stadelmann wrote: > So all packages have to be rebuilt to make their weak dependencies go into > repo metadata? This was not obvious from the first posting by Kevin Fenzi > and probably should go into a separate post here and on devel-announce too. I o

Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2016-10-14)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Friday at 16:00UTC in #fedora-meeting onirc.freenode.net. If needed any more topics to discuss we can discuss it in Open Floor. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto

Re: Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2016-10-14)

On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 4:57 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 4:03 AM, Parag Nemade wrote: >> Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the >> FESCo meeting Friday at 16:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on >> irc.freenode.net. >> >> If nee

Re: Why there is no sync for libicu soname rebuilds?

Hi, On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 8:04 PM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > On 02/04/2015 02:21 PM, Parag N(पराग़) wrote: >> Hi, >> I remember one year back also harfbuzz was attempted by 2 people on >> the same day for libicu rebuilds and now this time 3 builds by 2 >> people. >> >> http://koji.fedoraproject

Re: rawhide report: 20150212 changes

On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 9:09 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > On 02/12/2015 07:54 AM, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote: >> >> Compose started at Thu Feb 12 10:59:03 UTC 2015 > > >> xorg-x11-server-1.17.1-1.fc22 > > > Shouldn't we be seeing fc23 builds now in rawhide? I too can't see my fc23 builds in this

Review swap

Hi, I've got one nodejs module package in need of review. I will be happy to review your package requests in return. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1408105 Regards, Parag ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscri

Orphaning few very old packages

Hi, I am the the maintainer for following few packages since long time. I got these packages from its previous owner who left its maintainership. They have not seen any upstream releases since last few years. greadelf elfinfo rmanage Also, I have been maintainer for following typesupply python

Re: Orphaning zanata-parent, zanata-api, zanata-common, zanata-client

Hi, On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 7:12 AM, Ding Yi Chen wrote: > As we merge our repositories into zanata-platform [1]. > so the new versions of Zanata client will be supplied by zanata-platform. > > The following repositories are depreciated: > > zanata-parent > zanata-api > zanata-common > zanata-clie

Re: Unresponsive packager process and reviews

On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 5:23 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 03/13/2017 10:38 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> >> Is this not enough [1] or you want to make the reviews part of orphaning >> process? > > >> [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews > > > The latter. [1] is not e

Re: 610 emails for a branch import in dist git?

On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 12:29 PM, Michal Novotny wrote: > Can you, please, show the emails or just one of them? > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/search?mlist=scm-commits%40lists.fedoraproject.org&q=audacious-plugins > On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 11:34 PM, Michael Schwendt > wrote: >

Re: glibc in Fedora rawhide now split by langpacks.

Hi, On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 3:52 PM, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > On 02/26/2016 04:47 AM, Carlos O'Donell wrote: >> The glibc in Fedora rawhide and F24 is now split by >> language packs. We have over 180 supported languages >> in glibc, and those have been split into langpacks >> for transparent inst

Re: glibc in Fedora rawhide now split by langpacks.

Hi Richard, On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 5:55 PM, Richard Hughes wrote: > On 26 February 2016 at 09:47, Carlos O'Donell wrote: >> We have over 180 supported languages >> in glibc, and those have been split into langpacks >> for transparent install and support via dnf. > > What happens if the user isn

Re: glibc in Fedora rawhide now split by langpacks.

Hi, On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 8:54 PM, Richard Hughes wrote: > On 26 February 2016 at 13:25, Parag Nemade wrote: >> Please have a look at New Langpacks Change[1] information. > > Thanks for the information -- this looks a lot better than the current > logic and so a huge thank

Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2016-04-08)

Hi, Please note that I feel only one ticket is there in this week that need discussion. If any other existing open ticket need to be discussed then we can discuss that in the meeting but I am adding only one new ticket on the Agenda of this meeting. Following is the list of topics that will be

Summary/Minutes for today's FESCo meeting (2016-04-08)

=== #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2016-04-08) === Meeting started by paragan at 17:00:07 UTC. The full logs are available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2016-04-08/fesco.2016-04-08-17.00.log.html . Meeting summary -

Re: Orphaned Packages in branched (2016-05-03)

Hi, 2016-05-03 21:53 GMT+05:30 : > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they > are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure > that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_

Re: F25 System Wide Change: Use /etc/distro.repos.d as default reposdir

Hi, On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 1:06 PM, Jan Kurik wrote: > = Proposed System Wide Change: Use /etc/distro.repos.d as default reposdir = > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ReposInEtcDistroReposD > > Change owner(s): > * Neal Gompa > * Jan Silhan > > > == Detailed Description == > For DNF 2.0

Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2016-05-20)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Friday at 16:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2016-05-20 16:00 UTC' Links to all tickets below c

Summary/Minutes for today's FESCo meeting (2016-05-20)

=== #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2016-05-20) === Meeting started by paragan at 16:00:27 UTC. The full logs are available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2016-05-20/fesco.2016-05-20-16.00.log.html . Meeting summary -

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2016-10-14)

Hi, Thanks to Kevin for running this meeting. === #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2016-10-14) === Meeting started by paragan at 16:00:37 UTC. The full logs are available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2016-10-14/fesc

Re: Notifications on dependency retirement

On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 5:04 PM, Julien Enselme wrote: > Hi, > > I discovered this morning that a package I co-maintain was retired > (ccnet [1]) because one of its dependency was retired (libzdb [2]). I > learned it only because we have an open bug on it that change assigner > because of this fac

Re: Critpath flags on Emacs and Guile

Hi, On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 2:13 PM, Jan Synacek wrote: > Why were critpath flags set on Emacs and Guile? I think guile package was added because of @critical-path-base @critical-path-base installs rpm-build -> gdb-headless -> guile and emacs package was added because of @core group @core group

Re: Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2016-11-04)

On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 7:12 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On 11/11/2016 08:38 AM, Jared K. Smith wrote: >> >> On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 12:14 PM, Jared K. Smith > > wrote: >> >> For the second week in a row, we didn't have enough FESCo members to >> reach a >>

Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2016-11-11)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Friday at 16:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2016-11-11 16:00 UTC' Links to all issues below ca

Re: Wiki page subscription

On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 9:00 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 11/16/2016 04:05 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> >> On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 12:03:42 +0100 >> Florian Weimer wrote: >> >>> On the Fedora wiki, I can subscribe to certain pages. I did that, >>> but I did not receive any notifications when they wer

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 31 Beta Freeze

On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 4:14 PM Mamoru TASAKA wrote: > Mohan Boddu wrote on 2019/08/27 9:55: > > Hi all, > > > > > > > Today is also the Beta freeze[4]. This means that only packages which fix > > accepted blocker or freeze exception > > bugs[5][6] will be marked as 'stable' and included in the

Re: Fedora 32 System-Wide Change proposal: Move fonts language Provides to Langpacks

wn quality would get selected, so the > > mechanism is not unreliable. > > > > This change uses instead the default fonts chosen in `langpacks` for > > each language, to give reliable predictable default fonts for each > > language and improve the user application exp

Re: F30 System-Wide Change proposal: Replace Comps Language Group With Langpacks

thods for the given language. > > > > == Owner == > > * Name: [[User:petersen| Jens Petersen]] > > * Email: petersen at fedoraproject dot org > > * Name: [[User:pnemade| Parag Nemade]] > > * Email: pnemade at fedoraproject dot org > > > > == Detailed Description ==

Re: F30 System-Wide Change proposal: Replace Comps Language Group With Langpacks

On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 12:55 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek < zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 12:31:38PM +0530, Parag Nemade wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 4:23 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek < > > zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > > > Do

Re: F30 System-Wide Change proposal: Replace Comps Language Group With Langpacks

On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 5:37 PM David Tardon wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, 2019-01-09 at 14:56 -0500, Ben Cotton wrote: > > E.g. if you net-install Fedora in Japanese language then installation > > of any base package like libreoffice-core or man-pages are installing > > automatically libreoffice-lang

Re: F30 System-Wide Change proposal: Replace Comps Language Group With Langpacks

On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 12:49 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek < zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 02:56:59PM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote: > > Congratulations to the last System-Wide Change proposal of F30! > > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Replace_Comps_Language_Group_W

Re: F30 System-Wide Change proposal: Replace Comps Language Group With Langpacks

packs > > > > == Summary == > > Language support groups in Comps file will get replaced by langpacks > > package. With this Change we want meta-packages like langpacks-ja to > > also install required fonts and input-methods for the given language. > > > > == Own

Re: Help needed for FTBFS in rawhide because of libraries order

On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 5:44 PM Mamoru TASAKA wrote: > Guido Aulisi wrote on 2019/02/03 20:31: > > Hi, > > I'm trying to debug a FTBFS in rawhide: > > > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=32412101 > > > > Apparently it fails because of library ordering, but it works in f29. > >

Re: Langpacks and the packages needed to display/input a language

Hi Jason, On Sat, Jun 15, 2019 at 4:35 AM Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > I noticed that my F30 installs are coming out far larger than my F29 > installs (by 3GB or so) and did some digging into why. > > With F30 we switched away from having groups named like "korean-support" > that you could inst

Re: GNOME 3.30.0 megaupdate

On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 8:49 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 11:12 AM Kalev Lember > wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> As many of you know, I've been gone half the summer. I'm back now since >> Monday though and just in time for GNOME 3.30.0 :) >> >> We are quite a bit behind wi

Re: Intent to relicense fontpackages

Hi, On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 9:14 PM Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > Hi all, > > Just FYI, I intend to relicense fontpackages from LGPL3+ to GPL3+, to > make sharing parts with go-macros easier. > Can it be possible for you to explain this further? I want to understand how license change can help here.

Re: %find_lang does not find locale files

Hi, On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 11:58 PM Alexander Ploumistos < alex.ploumis...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I know this has been asked before, more recently four years ago in > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/OQDWCHFDTBKCPHWF2VLPUF74WC76TCNY/#6

Re: Tracker bug for approved change proposals

Hi, Is there any update on how bug tracking for Change proposals is going to be handled for Fedora 39? Regards, Parag ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code

Re: Breaking changes to fonts

Hi, On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 6:12 PM Sandro wrote: > Hi, > > Looking into flare-engine failing to build from source, I encountered > two issues with font packages: > > 1. Path change in liberation-sans-fonts > 2. Name change of subpkg for unifont > > The first appeared trivial. The path to the fo

  1   2   >