Hi,

On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 2:19 PM, Kamil Paral <kpa...@redhat.com> wrote:
>> Any kind of feedback after package gets into updates repository should
>> be denied, I can't think of a case where package moves to updates
>> repository and bodhi still allows to add comments/karma. Any feedback
>> after that can be either reported in bugzilla or to the package
>> maintainers directly. Its not like providing positive or negative
>> karma will make any changes to already pushed package to updates
>> repository.
>
> I do have valid use cases. We've had examples of important packages having 
> been pushed stable too quickly and breaking some computers (think kernel, 
> mesa). The bodhi comments can then be used to provide a description of the 
> problem, suggest any workarounds or fixes, and also link to more information 
> e.g. in the bugzilla or common bugs wiki, etc. The Bodhi pages are easy to 
> find (if I perform a system update and the computer breaks, I look at what 
> was included in the last update, and look at any bodhi feedback for those 
> packages), so it makes perfect sense to inform people there. It's much harder 
> to search bugzilla to find issues with a particular package.

In this case its better to disable karma and just let users provide
feedback. Its really annoying to get just +1 karma on your package
when that package is already stable.

>
> So, the ability to comment post-push should remain. However, it would make 
> sense to tweak email notifications somewhat (so that everyone is not spammed 
> with each new comment long after the package is pushed stable). That's what I 
> assume annoys people.
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to