ains an md5sum of the source tarball.
The message is somewhat misleading, because the 'sources' file gets staged
automatically after new-sources, so if you do fedpkg commit, it gets commited
anyway.
Hope this explanation is not even more confusing:)
Best regards,
--
Jan Synacek
BaseOS team
I can't 'fedpkg build' right now and I'm not sure where to file this.
--
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, Red Hat
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora C
fedoraproject.org/updates/pidgin-2.10.11-2.fc21
--
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, Red Hat
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
here a way I can tell what
> the process is and why it hasn't returned yet? Any other ideas on how I can
> figure out what is going wrong?
>
> Thanks,
> Dave
This is somewhat reminiscent of [1]. Any chance that the process that
actually uses the cpu is dbus related?
[1
I'm trying to give one of my packages (openldap) to another developer,
but the online tool keeps saying that "User is not in the packager
group", which I believe is not true, because he is in the same Fedora
groups as I am. Where can I report this?
Cheers,
--
Jan Synacek
Softwar
Michael Schwendt writes:
> On Wed, 29 Apr 2015 10:52:09 +0200, Jan Synacek wrote:
>
>> I'm trying to give one of my packages (openldap) to another developer,
>> but the online tool keeps saying that "User is not in the packager
>> group", which I believe
asy to do, and they can choose
From stable/development versions.
> The whole issue is another case of competition between an application
> package managers (package.el) and system package management such as we
> have had to solve for perl, python, texlive etc etc. But it's not
&g
Jonathan Underwood writes:
> On 24 June 2015 at 08:01, Jan Synacek wrote:
>> Jonathan Underwood writes:
>>> So, I am not really sure what a good way forward is at this point.
>>> Certainly package.el could be extended to help us out in some ways,
>>> such
1]
http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?s=9f6f6c4f2dcd351cecc8a7e890126229&t=148976
Regards,
--
Jan Synacek
BaseOS team Brno
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
need be) if there are any
unmatched entries.
You can run logwatch like so:
logwatch --range all --service all
[1] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=317339
Thank you!
--
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, BaseOS team Brno, Red Hat
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraprojec
On 05/04/12 at 09:38am, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 04/05/12 09:35, Jan Synacek wrote:
> >Hello list,
> >
> >I'm looking for as many logwatch runs in Fedora 16 as possible. I need to
> >test
> >the F17 package so I know if there are any problems with compatibili
On 05/04/12 at 01:01pm, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 04/05/12 12:54, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >
> >
> >Am 04.05.2012 13:48, schrieb Frank Murphy:
> >>On 04/05/12 09:35, Jan Synacek wrote:
> >>
> >>should last 24hrs
> >>
> >>http://fpast
On 05/05/12 at 08:46pm, Richard Vickery wrote:
> - Selinux Audit Begin
>
>
> **Unmatched Entries**
>
Thank you, Richard!
--
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, BaseOS team Brno, Red Hat
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedorapr
my problem is. I looks like a race
condition between some of the autotools, but I'm not really sure.
The problem goes away when I add sleep 1 between autoreconf and %configure in
the spec file.
Any ideas?
Thanks,
--
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, BaseOS team Brno, Red Hat
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
l. As previously, any help is really appreciated.
>
> yum groupinstall "GNOME Desktop Environment"
This alone unfortunately doesn't do the trick. You will probably have to
yum groupinstall "X Window System"
as well as some drivers for your graphic card to
On 07/10/2012 03:46 AM, Stu Tomlinson wrote:
>
>
> Just about. co-maintainers welcome.
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Stu.
>
I will be happy to help.
--
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, BaseOS team Brno, Red Hat
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I've been trying to contact Stu Tomlinson for a while now -- in a
bugzilla [1] and by mail. Anybody know how to contact him?
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058220
Cheers,
- --
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, Re
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/10/2014 01:32 PM, Jan Synacek wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've been trying to contact Stu Tomlinson for a while now -- in a
> bugzilla [1] and by mail. Anybody know how to contact him?
>
> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/12/2014 12:47 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> Hi Jan,
>
> On Monday, 10 February 2014 at 13:35, Jan Synacek wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 02/10/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/10/2014 01:32 PM, Jan Synacek wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've been trying to contact Stu Tomlinson for a while now -- in a
> bugzilla [1] and by mail. Anybody know how to contact him?
>
> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/17/2014 01:57 PM, Stu Tomlinson wrote:
> Jan,
>
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Jan Synacek wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 02/10/2014 01:32 PM, Jan Synacek wrote:
>&
=460307
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693716
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028557
>
> It's obviously a longstanding packaging bug in openldap and I think it
> needs to be fixed.
>
> Rich.
>
Thanks for the report. Let's continue in the
I'm getting this error:
bash: /usr/bin/rpmbuild: No such file or directory
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11804093
Cheers,
--
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, Red Hat
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Peter Robinson writes:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 12:47 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Jan Synacek wrote:
>>> I'm getting this error:
>>>
>>> bash: /usr/bin/rpmbuild: No such file or directory
>>>
>>>
attached
patch should answer your question.
Cheers,
--
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, Red Hat
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
t suddenly require emacs-filesystem to be
installed as a dependency.
Any comments? Maybe there are still people that were involved with the
change?
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661866
Cheers,
--
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, Red Hat
signature.asc
Description: PGP signatur
Michael Schwendt writes:
> On Mon, 04 Jan 2016 15:35:51 +0100, Jan Synacek wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> long time ago, there was a request to create the emacs-filesystem
>> package [1], so other packages could drop their emacs-specific files
>> there. I beli
sktop icon is then
simply consitent with the rest of the icons. The emacsclient behavior is
just weird.
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1175969
Cheers,
--
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, Red Hat
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedorap
Jonathan Underwood writes:
> On 4 January 2016 at 14:35, Jan Synacek wrote:
>> ...
>> Any comments? Maybe there are still people that were involved with the
>> change?
>
> Those unaware of history are doomed to repeat it :)
That's why I'm asking ;)
>
Haïkel writes:
> 2016-01-07 9:07 GMT+01:00 Jan Synacek :
>> Hello Emacs fans,
>>
>> in case you want to try the latest Emacs and don't want to build it
>> yourselves...
>>
>> https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/jsynacek/emacs-25/
>>
>
>
Kevin Fenzi writes:
> ...
> purple-plugin_pack -- A set of plugins for libpurple, pidgin, and finch (
> master f23 f22 )
Taken.
--
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, Red Hat
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject
Hello all,
what should I do with the spec file of a package (ftp) with no upstream and no
upstream source?
I mean the URL and Source0 lines. Should I just let them there, put a note in a
comment or
just remove them?
I haven't found anything about such case in the guidelines.
Thanks,
--
On 07/18/2012 10:43 AM, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 10:19 +0200, Jan Synacek wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> what should I do with the spec file of a package (ftp) with no upstream and
>> no upstream source?
>> I mean the URL and Source0 lines. Should
lackware mirrors.
What other packages can be affected?
[1] ftp://ftp.uk.linux.org/pub/linux/Networking/netkit
--
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, BaseOS team Brno, Red Hat
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 07/19/2012 09:42 AM, Paul Black wrote:
> On 19 July 2012 06:15, Jan Synacek <mailto:jsyna...@redhat.com>wrote:
>
> On 07/18/2012 04:15 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> >
> > Did the netkit upstream finally give up the ghost entirely? If so, it
> likely
but then the old programs won't ever get patched:) IMO the best way would be
some kind of a compatibility layer in guile itself, but I don't think that's
worth the trouble and the net gain for the upstream.
--
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, BaseOS team Brno, Red Hat
--
devel mailing li
usr/sbin/ldconfig
> ...
This looks like a bug to me. The package requires %{_sbindir}/ldconfig, which is
fine AFAIK.
--
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, BaseOS team Brno, Red Hat
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
dorapeople.org/guile/pkgs/
Cheers,
--
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, BaseOS team Brno, Red Hat
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
mdk
rumor
TeXmacs
trackballs
xbindkeys
Cheers,
--
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, BaseOS team Brno, Red Hat
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 10/23/2012 11:15 AM, Kalev Lember wrote:
> On 10/23/2012 08:51 AM, Jan Synacek wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I've created a review request for compat-guile1.8:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868263
>>
>> Once the compat package land
e and run and don't have to worry
about future changes. After guile is upgraded to 2.0.x, you can slowly start
porting as well.
Huh, I hope my point is clearly visible in my slightly complicated message..
Cheers,
--
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, BaseOS team Brno, Red Hat
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 10/23/2012 12:52 PM, Kalev Lember wrote:
> On 10/23/2012 12:12 PM, Jan Synacek wrote:
>> This is what I had originally in mind. After trying to realize this idea and
>> consulting it with the maintainer (I'm a comaintainer of guile), it didn't
>> seem
>>
putils and to file bugs without mercy;)
Cheers,
--
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, BaseOS team Brno, Red Hat
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
text-based logs. There is this RFE
filed [1], but that will probably not happen as it would require a total
rewrite. It would make more sense to write a new logwatch-like utility from
scratch, that handles only the journal. It's somewhere on my todo list, but has
quite a low priority:(
[
tition seems to be right, why "msdos" escapes me, though. How do I fix this
mess?
Cheers,
--
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, Red Hat
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On 08/21/2013 01:41 PM, Jan Synacek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just updated my rawhide machine and it stopped booting. I end up in "grub
> rescue>" prompt, stating that there is no '/grub2/i386-pc/normal.mod'.
>
> grub rescue> ls /grub2
> ./ ../ theme
I'll take a look at that. It make take a while though (priorities..).
--
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, Red Hat
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
o.2 -> libldap.so
>
> which as you say makes no sense.
>
> On the other hand, the links on the filesystem are still correct:
>
> $ ll /usr/lib64/libldap-2.4.so.2
> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 20 Apr 22 09:26 /usr/lib64/libldap-2.4.so.2 ->
> libldap-2.4.so.2.9.
>>
>> That makes no sense.
This bugzilla looks like it explains that behavior.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=159601
--
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, Red Hat
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
might have any influence. But, I noticed, that on my machine, all of my bash
processes are spawned via sssd, even though I didn't configure or even enable
it. If that or anything similar happened in your case, I wouldn't be surprised
that your shell is waiting for some timeouts while
ld someone who understands g++ please advise how to fix this? I
don't quite understand why it doesn't work.
Cheers,
--
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, Red Hat
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 2:22 PM, Jonathan Wakely
wrote:
> On 11/07/16 13:16 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 02:09:24PM +0200, Jan Synacek wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I'm trying to compile the latest version o
On 01/23/2013 04:54 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 09:58:09 -0500 (EST)
> Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
>
>> = Features/Guile2 =
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Guile2
>>
>> Feature owner(s): Jan Synacek
>>
>> Update GNU Guile to v
On 01/23/2013 10:23 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Jaroslav Reznik (jrez...@redhat.com) said:
>> = Features/Guile2 =
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Guile2
>>
>> Feature owner(s): Jan Synacek
>>
>> Update GNU Guile to version 2.0.x in Fe
the change much. If there are any openldap users, please,
comment.
Cheers,
--
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, Red Hat
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
gcc-4.9.2-5.fc22.x86_64 to quickly remove from
> the list packages that fail for non-GCC related reasons.
> ...
> openldap-2.4.40-5.fc22.src.rpm
Fixed:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1191098
--
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, Red Hat
signature.asc
Description: PGP signat
;
^
Could someone point me in the right direction? I've looked at [2], but
that doesn't seem to help much in this case.
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1254868
[2] https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-7/porting
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 9:27 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 09:15:46AM +0100, Jan Synacek wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> warzone2100 fails to build [1] and I have no idea how to fix that.
>> Most of the errors are:
>>
>> main_sdl.cpp:79:13
ommon directory,
>e.g. /usr/share/doc/git/
> ignoring the sub-package that install specific doc files.
Yes, please. Since versioned docs are not used anymore, this is makes
perfect sense, at least to me.
Cheers,
--
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, Red Hat
ng went successfully.
[1] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=20592574
Cheers,
--
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, Red Hat
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
ess, however
I do not want to be the owner of the package. Is anybody willing grab pidgin?
- --
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, Red Hat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJS1O9YAAoJEL3BmMJQ
the
URL? I couldn't find any other "upstream" sources.
> jsynacek:BADURL:xinetd-2.3.15.tar.gz:xinetd
Fixed.
- --
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, Red Hat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/14/2014 10:03 AM, Jan Synacek wrote:
> On 11/18/2013 04:54 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> jsynacek:BADURL:xferstats-2.16.tar.gz:xferstats
>
> xferstats.off.net seems to be down. I'll try to contact the author who is
> menti
of the
same problem, which is really sad. What is even more sad is the line
that has been added into the changelog. It says "Rebuilt for ",
which is simply not true.
--
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, Red Hat
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
f
system-python-libs-3.5.1-7.fc24.x86_64 conflicts with file from
package python3-libs-3.4.3-5.fc23.x86_64
file /usr/lib64/gstreamer-1.0/libgstopus.so from install of
gstreamer1-plugins-base-1.7.90-2.fc24.x86_64 conflicts with file from
package gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free-1.6.3-3.fc23.x86_64
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 12:46 PM, José Matos wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 22, 2016 12:13:47 PM WET Jan Synacek wrote:
>> Currently, it's not possible to update from F23 to F24 because of
>> broken dependencies.
>>
>> # dnf update --releasever=24 --best --allowerasing
f someone using.
>
> Do the pidgin maintainers want to take the package on, or recompile
> pidgin without silc support so we can get pidgin of the death list?
I've disabled silc support.
--
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, Red Hat
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 4:33 AM, Christopher wrote:
> Is it possible to pass rpmbuild options like --noclean to `fedpkg local`? If
> so, I can't seem to figure out how.
AFAIK no, at least on F24. For local builds, you get far more control
using plain mock -n (and/or --no-cleanup-after
Why were critpath flags set on Emacs and Guile?
Cheers,
--
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, Red Hat
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
;
Isn't packaging Rust libraries waste of time? Cargo does a great job
taking care of the libraries / dependencies.
How is packaging Rust applications different from packaging any
compiled (to ELF) applications? Apart from having the correct runtime,
of course.
Cheers
#x27; is not a valid identifier? There seems to be something wrong
with the basic systemtap installation. I do have matching debuginfo for
both kernel and systemd installed. Running stap-prep only wants to install
kernel-debuginfo.
How do I make this basic use-case work?
R
On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 10:37 PM Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Hi Jan,
>
> CC systemtap upstream list, because I think this is not a great error
> message.
>
> On Fri, 2019-09-06 at 09:53 +0200, Jan Synacek wrote:
> > I'm trying to run systemtap on F29 and I'
ild (f31-candidate,
> /rpms/cppad.git:82bd2cc17cc49f57aec7aabf1d0aeff9e664): open
> (buildvm-05.phx2.fedoraproject.org) -> FAILED: GenericError: cannot
> update build 1425936, state:
> COMPLETE
>0 free 0 open 7 done 1 failed
>
> 40063178 build (f31-candidate,
&g
ng two bugzillas
together, because they are similar, or simply to "also see" something that
might be related, can hardly be called external tracking.
--
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, Red Hat
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedor
installed
DEBUG util.py:490: BUILDSTDERR: - conflicting requests
DEBUG util.py:490: BUILDSTDERR: - nothing provides
libwmflite-0.2.so.7()(64bit) needed by
ImageMagick-libs-1:6.9.10.23-1.fc30.x86_64
Looks like a broken ImageMagick to me.
--
Jan Synacek
Sof
Hi,
I was trying to update pidgin, but the package doesn't build and it
doesn't seem to be a packaging problem to me [1]. What's happening?
[1] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=25678436
--
Jan Synacek
Software En
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 10:14 AM, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
> * Jan Synacek [13/03/2018 09:59] :
>>
>> [1] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=25678436
>
> From the root.log:
>
> DEBUG util.py:439: No matching package to install:
> 'NetworkManager
Did I miss something? The xinetd package cannot be built because of that.
Cheers,
--
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, Red Hat
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 11:43 AM, Dan Horák wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Mar 2018 11:30:32 +0100
> Jan Synacek wrote:
>
>> Did I miss something? The xinetd package cannot be built because of
>> that.
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SunRPCRemoval
So I missed someth
/xinetd
--
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, Red Hat
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of
and didn't change any settings. I didn't upgrade, but reinstalled
F26. I would like to fix this because it's killing my eyes. Any idea
what has changed or what to install/remove/reconfigure to bring the
old rendering back?
Cheers,
--
Jan Synacek
S
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 10:20 AM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 09:25:41AM +0200, Jan Synacek wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> something changed between F24 and F26 (even F25) regarding font
>> rendering and I can't figure out what it is. On F24, fonts were c
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 4:04 PM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 11:39:30AM +0200, Jan Synacek wrote:
>> > Bug 1469712 - font antialiasing/hinting is not working on Fedora 26
>> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1469712
>> Cheers, the sol
On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 6:38 PM, Igor Gnatenko
wrote:
> snip
I kind of wonder... What is so special about them that they deserve a
big announcement like this?
--
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, Red Hat
___
devel mailing list -- de
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 10:20 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 09:57:50AM +0100, Jan Synacek wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 6:38 PM, Igor Gnatenko
>> wrote:
>> > snip
>>
>> I kind of wonder... What is so special a
&& mv .depend.X .depend
/bin/sh: cc: command not found
I consider that a broken buildroot.
--
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, Red Hat
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.f
86 matches
Mail list logo
