On 04/22/2013 12:22 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 11:27:42AM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: >> 3) Funny things going on (f19 here), but haven't examined anything >> beyond this: >> >> # rpm -e openldap-devel >> # ldconfig -v|grep ldap >> libldap_r-2.4.so.2 -> libldap_r-2.4.so.2.9.1 >> libldap-2.4.so.2 -> libldap-2.4.so.2.9.1 >> # yum -y install openldap-devel >> # ldconfig -v|grep ldap >> libldap_r-2.4.so.2 -> libldap_r.so >> libldap-2.4.so.2 -> libldap.so >> >> That makes no sense.
Indeed. That looks like there's something wrong with ldconfig. > > On my (now fixed) system I get the same output from ldconfig: > > $ sudo ldconfig -v | grep ldap > ldconfig: Can't stat /libx32: No such file or directory > ldconfig: Path `/usr/lib' given more than once > ldconfig: Path `/usr/lib64' given more than once > ldconfig: Can't stat /usr/libx32: No such file or directory > libsmbldap.so.0 -> libsmbldap.so.0 > libldap_r-2.4.so.2 -> libldap_r.so > libldap-2.4.so.2 -> libldap.so > > which as you say makes no sense. > > On the other hand, the links on the filesystem are still correct: > > $ ll /usr/lib64/libldap-2.4.so.2 > lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 20 Apr 22 09:26 /usr/lib64/libldap-2.4.so.2 -> > libldap-2.4.so.2.9.0 > > Rich. > Have you found out how this originally happened? I can't get any of my f18-f20 machines to this state. -- Jan Synacek Software Engineer, Red Hat -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
