On 26/10/15 17:36 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Seems like I'm no longer getting emails about significant bodhi
> events, particularly when a package has spent days in testing and
> can be pushed to stable.
>
> Example update that I never got email about:
>
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.o
On 18/11/15 15:55 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> After FESCo approval of https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1499 I
> have modified the review process document:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process
> to indicate that any packager is welcome to complete the initial packa
On 25/01/16 19:43 -0800, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> I think that the "gateway" override should not be conflated with
> always letting the gethostname(2) return value resolve.
>
> I also think that the whole gethostname(2) mechanism is terminally
> screwed up. We abuse the hostname for multiple pu
On 19/07/13 02:41 -0400, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 11:24:22AM -0400, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
>>> FAQ:
>>> Q: Why do we need to switch to Python 3?
>>> A: Because Python 2 is old, slower, less pythonic, doesn't get any more
>>> functionality and
On 23/07/13 03:16 -0400, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> On 19/07/13 02:41 -0400, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
>>> - Original Message -
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 11:24:22AM -0400, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
> FAQ:
> Q: Why do we need to switch to Python 3?
> A:
On 26/07/13 14:58 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-07-26 at 13:57 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> One kind of nontrivial approach, but at least worth thinking about, is
> changing cron to keep a zygote process around (with a session) for users
> with active cron jobs.
>
> Futhermore if
On 01/08/13 12:52 -0500, Juan Rodriguez wrote:
> I've recently been approached about one of the packages I maintain,
> Blueman, an alternative Bluetooth Manager.
>
> At the time I packaged it, it was actively being developed, however
> development has stopped for over a year [1]. The project's dom
On 23/08/13 17:49 -0400, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:
> Or how about "None". It even fits with the lineage -- just like the
> Schrodinger's cat, it's neither False nor True. It's None.
>
> That would be a worthy tribute to the pythonista and the release-name hater.
+1
--
Jan
--
devel mailing li
On 31/08/13 09:36 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 01:19:54PM +0200, Maros Zatko wrote:
>> Hello dear Fedora comunity,
>>
>> I've hit very weird bug which happen to get very urgent now.
>> Something (very likely GTK{2,3} but not sure at all) is stealing my
>> mouse focus so t
On 15/04/13 10:10 -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
> I would say there is a place for SE Linux even if we compiled everything with
> "all" because FORTIFY_SOURCE coverage is not absolute. For example, about a
> month ago i ran the following test:
>
> procs=`ls /proc | grep '^[0-9]' | sort -n`
> for p i
On 23/05/16 10:22 +0200, Michael Šimáček wrote:
> few people who have groups defined in Koschei have asked whether they could
> automate maintentance of the package list with something like repoquery
> rule
Are you talking about "Global groups" or "Your groups" kind of groups?
Or are these the sam
On 06/02/17 05:06 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Hans de Goede wrote:
>> libglvnd is a solution for this it is a vendor neutral
>> implementation of libGL.so.1 which acts as a dispatcher
>> to one or more glvnd enabled libGL implementations
>> installed on the systems.
>
> By doing so, it decreases
n tell.
-- Jan
> Christian
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Jan Pokorný"
>> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Sent: Monday, February 6, 2017 2:32:35 PM
>> Subject: Re: The glvnd + mesa update for F25
>>
>> On 06/02/17 05:06
On 11/02/17 02:08 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Justin Forbes wrote:
>> * AGREED: Allow the update, encourage everyone to work through the
>> process better next time (7,0,0) (jforbes, 16:51:10)
>
> The context:
> https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1675
> #1675 Libglvnd update breaking F25
> is m
Hello,
today, I've accidentally attested there are no stability guarantees
with the on-demand archives from common git hosting sites when preparing
a new pacemaker update, redownloading "spectool -s 0 pacemaker.spec"
of the original (-0.1.rc1, from 2 weeks ago) spec and comparing the
hashes, which
On 24/05/17 09:58 -0500, Jorge Gallegos wrote:
> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 04:19:05PM +0200, Jan Pokorný wrote:
>> today, I've accidentally attested there are no stability guarantees
>> with the on-demand archives from common git hosting sites when preparing
>> a new pacem
On 25/05/17 00:28 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 05:22:43PM +0200, Jan Pokorný wrote:
>> On 24/05/17 09:58 -0500, Jorge Gallegos wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 04:19:05PM +0200, Jan Pokorný wrote:
>>>> today, I've
On 07/06/17 23:36 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 11:22 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
>> I've got a couple of updates which are stuck waiting to get pushed to
>> stable:
>>
>> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-e46ec0bbe8
>> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/
On 31/03/16 21:28 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> I've just submitted
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-dcddcc1f06
>
> This update does two things:
>
> - Updates python to version 2.7.11
> - Splits out the python macros into separate packages
>
> It would be helpful if packag
On 02/04/16 12:26 +0200, Jan Pokorný wrote:
> On 31/03/16 21:28 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>> I've just submitted
>> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-dcddcc1f06
>>
>> This update does two things:
>>
>> - Updates python to vers
On 02/04/16 13:58 +0200, Jan Pokorný wrote:
> On 02/04/16 12:26 +0200, Jan Pokorný wrote:
>> On 31/03/16 21:28 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>>> I've just submitted
>>> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-dcddcc1f06
>>>
>>> This up
On 07/04/16 09:41 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Apr 2016 15:28:37 +0200
> Jan Pokorný wrote:
>
> ...snip...
>
>> Does bodhi allow to specify several builds as a means of an atomic
>> (non-racy) override? Should I file a RFE for that if not?
>
> Seems
On 15/01/17 00:13 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> == No need for static allocation, afaict
> games, man, slocate, squid, named, postgres, mysql, nscd,
> rpcuser, rpc, rpm, ntp, mailman, gdm, utempter, apache, smmsp,
> tomcat, frontpage, nut, beagleindex, avahi, tcpdmp, privoxy, radvd,
>
On 30/01/17 00:53 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> This is the result of 4 very poor decisions, by different people/groups:
>
> 1. the decision to enable libglvnd in an update to a stable release. IMHO,
>such a change is totally unsuitable for a stable release update and
>should have been done
On 30/01/17 14:44 +0100, Jan Pokorný wrote:
> On 30/01/17 00:53 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> This is the result of 4 very poor decisions, by different people/groups:
>>
>> 1. the decision to enable libglvnd in an update to a stable release. IMHO,
>>such a change
On 04/11/19 10:40 -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> IMHO, this should be our number one priority over modules, new
> spins, or whatever paint color the bike shed needs to be today.
> I would like to see DNS over TLS (DoT) with DTLS at the very least.
I may be wrong, but it seems to me the usual
On 03/12/19 13:29 +0100, Martin Stransky wrote:
> Just FYI, Firefox is recently crashing on Rawhide due to two independent
> issues as rawhide gets all builds automatically:
>
> 1) PGO mis-compilation/Firefox bug
> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1779082). Please use 'npgo'
> builds f
On 20/08/19 20:59 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> There is no good reason for the current behavior, in particular on a
> laptop. And it's fail danger, not fail safe. The very simple work
> around for the computer shutting off in 3 minutes of inactivity and
> you don't like that? Power it back on and e
On 29/09/19 16:24 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> I wrote:
>> I'm planning to push asciidoctor-2.0.10 to rawhide in the
>> next few days.
>
> This has now been built and should show up in the next
> rawhide compose.
Tried rebuilding booth to see if there will be any differences in the
generated ma
Hello ,
On 26/11/18 15:12 +0100, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 11:36 AM Tomasz Kłoczko
> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 25 Nov 2018 at 11:19, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
>> zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 02:36:31AM +0100, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
After last d
On 26/11/18 20:58 +0100, Jan Pokorný wrote:
> On 26/11/18 15:12 +0100, Tom Gundersen wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 11:36 AM Tomasz Kłoczko
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 25 Nov 2018 at 11:19, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
>>> zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
On 28/11/18 11:48 -0400, Robert Marcano wrote:
> There is another thing I found wrong. The backed up nsswitch.conf has these
> lines appended (ckey and incomplete aliases line) after the real end of the
> original file (aliases: files):
>
> aliases:files
> ckey: files
>
> aliases:f
On 16/11/18 22:07 +, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> The core idea behind zchunk is that a file is split into independently
> compressed chunks and the checksum of each compressed chunk is stored
> in the zchunk header. When downloading a new version of the file, you
> download the zchunk header firs
On 11/03/19 12:31 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Can somebody please enlighten me, how to update Rawhide after branching
> and not using --nogpgcheck?
Good question; have observed this over several (if not all since
to-be-f26 based Rawhide) jumps like that, and always have solved this
inconvenience b
On 11/03/19 15:01 +0100, Jan Pokorný wrote:
> On 11/03/19 12:31 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>> Can somebody please enlighten me, how to update Rawhide after branching
>> and not using --nogpgcheck?
>
> Good question; have observed this over several (if not all since
> to-be-
On 11/03/19 18:05 +0100, Jan Pokorný wrote:
> On 11/03/19 15:01 +0100, Jan Pokorný wrote:
>> On 11/03/19 12:31 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>>> Can somebody please enlighten me, how to update Rawhide after branching
>>> and not using --nogpgcheck?
>>
>> Good qu
On 18/03/19 16:22 +0100, Till Hofmann wrote:
> there's been a rising number of people interested in sway, the
> i3-compatible Wayland compositor. At the same time, with the recent sway
> 1.0 release, the packaging work is also increasing, as more and more
> components are split into separate projec
On 22/03/19 19:17 +0100, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 6:04 PM Japheth Cleaver
> wrote:
>> IMO the situation that we're in now ("Assume you're running in
>> bash, but called as -/bin/sh") is a worst-of-both-worlds middle
>> ground, somewhat akin to mandating webpages be writt
On 25/04/19 10:53 +0100, Phil Wyett wrote:
> I tried make contact directly a couple of weeks ago via email,
> with no luck.
>
> I currently have a number of Pull Requests (PR) against the package
> and further updates to do if allowed.
>
> I am not sure if the package is going to be orphaned or t
On 25/04/19 09:35 +0200, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
> Also please note that fedora-cisco-openh264.repo ships with
> "skip_if_unavailable=true".
off-topic: which in fact doesn't matter much, since you'll, sooner
or later and whether you want or not, receive non-free (in a sense)
binaries over the nat
On 08/10/18 18:28 -0500, Zebediah Figura wrote:
> On 08/10/18 16:43, John Reiser wrote:
>> On 10/8/18 2026 UTC, Zebediah Figura wrote:
>>> On 08/10/18 2000 UTC, John Reiser wrote:
Allowing 1M open files per unprivileged process is too many.
Megabytes of RAM are precious. A hard lim
On 27/08/18 08:41 +0200, Matthias Runge wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 03:48:12PM +0200, Bob Mauchin wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 17, 2018, 12:53 Leigh Scott
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Besser82 hasn't answered any of my emails for months.
>>>
>>
>> I saw him back in May for a couple of reviews, maybe he's in
On 01/11/18 08:30 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 01. 11. 18 7:48, Jan Pokorný wrote:
>> I'd be interested in (co)maintenance of one of his packages,
>> tried contacting him over email (less than a day ago), then
>> realized I could check this ML.
>
> Claim the pac
On 01/11/18 09:53 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Le mercredi 31 octobre 2018 à 17:13 -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga a écrit :
>> It will be nice to enable powerline theme by default system and user
>> wide. Simple reason is refresh the look of terminal while also
>> providing
>> useful information espec
Not sure where to report this for the Fedora side, but there seems to
be some synchronization issue regarding the built artifacts hosted at
http://ciscobinary.openh264.org, since older packages can be obtained
just fine:
https://github.com/cisco/openh264/issues/3037#issuecomment-436932562
--
Jan
On 19/11/18 13:13 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Le 2018-11-19 12:28, Martin Kolman a écrit :
>
>> Many people might think RAM would not be an issue in 2018, but in
>> practice there are
>> and likely always will be memory constrained installation targets,
>> such as massive deployments
>> of "sm
On 04/12/17 16:09 +0100, Jan Kurik wrote:
> === Language and Keyboard Layout ===
>
> Although we do not propose it at this time, language and keyboard
> layout selection should be presented to the user *before* entering the
> live session, as it is currently too difficult for users to change
> the
On 11/12/17 01:05 +0100, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote:
> I'll update json-c to v0.13 for Rawhide. This will bump libjson-c so-
> name from 2 to 3 and will remove some deprecated stuff from its API.
Looks like json-c is not that compatible between 0.12 and 0.13 to
rush with changes like this:
htt
On 13/12/17 12:05 +0100, Ondrej Kozina wrote:
> On 12/12/2017 06:41 PM, Jan Pokorný wrote:
>> On 11/12/17 01:05 +0100, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote:
>>> I'll update json-c to v0.13 for Rawhide. This will bump libjson-c so-
>>> name from 2 to 3 and will
On 09/01/18 16:16 +0100, Tomasz Torcz 👁️ wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 12:11:31PM +0100, Jan Kurik wrote:
>> = System Wide Change: Binutils version 2.29.1 =
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BINUTILS2291
>>
>> Change owner(s):
>> * Nick Clifton
>>
>> Rebase the binutils package from v
Hello Ville,
On 23/10/17 22:24 +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> The following packages are looking for new maintainers, ping me if
> you're able to help out.
>
> 1) No co-maintainers at the moment:
>
> [...]
> - jing-trang
still somewhat interested in that package, would help to keep it in
Fedora i
On 09/04/18 13:38 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On 09/04/18 13:01 +0100, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
>> 8) If someone is using Linux working in VM or headless HW ..
>
> Actually a lot of VMs have mice mapped by default.
>
>> -CONFIG_INPUT_MOUSEDEV=y
>> +CONFIG_INPUT_MOUSEDEV=m
>>
>> -CONFIG_MOUSE_PS2
On 14/05/18 17:19 +0200, David Kaspar [Dee'Kej] wrote:
> does anybody know if the files /etc/profile.d/lang.{csh,sh}
> are still used these days, and what for?
> Do we still need them in Fedora?
> Should they be installed by default these days?
>
> Any info is appreciated! :)
Frankly, had no idea
On 3/10/21 1:32 PM, Petr Menšík wrote:
I think Björn's point is valid note. Because DNSSEC is used to verify
email of used key, but fedora.repo does not contain any hint about how
email in GPG key should look like. Also does not contain fingerprint of
such key. It would be nice to include email o
54 matches
Mail list logo
