On 11/02/17 02:08 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Justin Forbes wrote: >> * AGREED: Allow the update, encourage everyone to work through the >> process better next time (7,0,0) (jforbes, 16:51:10) > > The context: > https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1675 > #1675 Libglvnd update breaking F25 > is missing there.
Thanks for balancing the informational depth of the message out (I sincerely hope it wasn't a case opportunistic obscurity). > This is essentially giving the GNOME developers a blanket license to violate > all Fedora policies, they can just go ahead with their policy violation, > with only an "encouragement" to, you know, actually follow policies next > time, maybe, if they're nice. And that even unanimously. > > I expected better from FESCo! -- Jan (Poki)
pgp6ltILnBqRp.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
