On Sat, Dec 3, 2022, 17:26 Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Sat, 2022-12-03 at 11:57 +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> > On 03/12/2022 00:30, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > The proposal now is to keep ImageMagick 6 and make a new package
> > > with
> > > ImageMagick 7 , when we have all applications us
On Fri, Dec 9, 2022 at 11:43 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
>
> So since this turns out to be less important than I thought (thanks bcl
> for the correction) I won't poke it much further than I have today, but
> following up on the above, I've done a couple of PRs, one to strip more
> stuff in lorax:
>
On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 10:58 AM Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I how solved this ? [1]
> Thank you
I suggest that you take a look at the Rust packaging guidelines, or at
how other packages in similar situations have handled this.
You need to configure the cargo build system correctly, i.e.
1.
On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 9:20 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 1, 2022 at 3:16 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> >
> > I have now submitted
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2150093 and
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2150094 for the
> > `node
Hi all,
With the update to the regex-syntax crate package that I'm building
right now, the license will change from "MIT OR Apache-2.0" to "(MIT
OR Apache-2.0) AND Unicode-DFS-2016".
The project includes code that is derived from Unicode data files, and
it already shipped a license text for the U
On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 4:38 PM Ron Olson wrote:
>
> Hey all-
>
> I’m curious how Upstream Monitoring works; I got a BZ filed that Swift 5.7.2
> is available, which I’m building now, but what surprised me was how fast the
> new version was detected and brought to my attention. Does it use The Ne
On Sat, Dec 17, 2022, 20:59 Florian Weimer wrote:
> It looks like COPR always produces 1 for %autorelease. Is this a known
> issue? Is there a way around it?
>
> Here's a build that shows this:
>
> <
> https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/fweimer/modernc-1/build/5152562/>
>
> Thanks,
> Flo
On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 1:28 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 19. 12. 22 18:47, Barry Scott wrote:
> >
> >
> >> On 19 Dec 2022, at 17:40, Ben Cotton wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 12:36 PM Barry wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Why is pysvn on the list? I the pysvn maintainer and i am active.
> >>> I a
On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 11:02 AM Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> Is there a lightweight tool to take the repository generated by
> %autosetup -S, with some new commits on to top, and turn that into a
> spec file update? That is, generated the new patches, and make a
> conservative change to the spec fi
On Tue, Dec 27, 2022 at 7:30 PM Ron Olson wrote:
>
> Hey all-
>
> I commented out a SOURCES line in a spec file to test something and got an
> interesting warning: “Macro expanded in comment on line …”. I assume it’s
> just that, a warning, but was kinda surprised to see a commented-out line
>
On Sat, Dec 24, 2022 at 4:38 AM Steve Grubb wrote:
>
> On Friday, December 23, 2022 1:34:48 PM EST Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 23, 2022 at 7:21 PM Steve Grubb wrote:
> > > This is nice, but all I ever seen is a black screen and a spinning
> > > circle. No text of any kind. If som
On Sat, Dec 31, 2022 at 9:38 PM Stephen Smoogen wrote:
>
> My main questions are what is this supposed to fix long term?
>
> I have guessed that it has to do with automation, the shrinking number of
> active packagers in operating systems, and the exploding number of packages
> in requested lang
On Sat, Dec 31, 2022 at 3:48 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 9:37 PM Kevin Kofler via devel
> wrote:
> >
> > Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > Can we please have gcc-rs also built (even though it's experimental)?
> >
> > Will gcc-rs be able to generate usable shared libraries for Rust crat
On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 2:14 PM Stephen Smoogen wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, 3 Jan 2023 at 04:20, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 03, 2023 at 09:32:58AM +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
>> > On 02/01/2023 21:44, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>> > > - fedpkg mockbuild
>
On Mon, Jan 9, 2023 at 3:25 PM Maxwell G via devel
wrote:
>
>
> Jan 7, 2023 4:41:29 PM Lumír Balhar :
>
> > y-py upstream uses maturin as a build backend which is not available in
> > Fedora yet so I had to add some metadata manually to port it to
> > setuptools-rust
> Why not package maturin? Is
On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 12:15 AM Kevin Kofler via devel
wrote:
>
> Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > (In particular, I doubt the _FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 change was really a major
> > consideration here.)
>
> What was, then? That was literally the only thing that has changed between
> the two diametrically di
On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 7:34 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/UnfilteredFlathub
>
> Note that I am processing this proposal past the deadline because 1. I
> think it could reasonably be considered a Self-Contained Change
> proposal and 2. the reasons outlined by Matt
On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 3:07 PM Olivier Fourdan wrote:
>
> We could just remove xorg-x11-drv-qxl from the list of drivers pulled
> in from xorg-x11-drivers, wdyt?
Aren't QXL the default graphics when setting up a Fedora VM with
libvirt (i.e. gnome-boxes and virt-manager)?
Maybe letting that drive
On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 9:01 PM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 08:42:32PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > On 16. 01. 23 20:30, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
> > > If it is for distribution packages then I reckon the flags should be
> > > as close as possible for the mere reason of con
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 1:39 PM Jakub Jelinek wrote:>
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 01:24:45PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > Hello. GCC was updated to 13 in rawhide while the Fedora change was still
> > being voted about by FESCo.
> >
> > Apparently, the following packages now don't install:
>
> Ther
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 4:13 PM Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 8:18 AM Arthur Bols wrote:
>>
>> On 17/01/2023 14:57, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
>> > So bodhi and pagure are at different datacenters with hopefully different
>> > network paths. Could people do some mtr or traceroutes f
On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 10:02 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 16. 01. 23 21:37, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > Isn't the problem here that building Python extensions needs to work
> > correctly in two - possibly conflicting - scenarios:
> >
> > - in RPM packages, whe
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 7:05 PM Mattia Verga via devel
wrote:
>
> Il 17/01/23 12:54, Miro Hrončok ha scritto:
> >
> > Is it possible that bodhi no longer automatically recognizes the changelog
> > of
> > Rawhide updates?
> >
> > See before the update:
> >
> > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updat
On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 4:48 PM David Howells wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Does anyone know how to package a rust project as an rpm on Fedora 37,
> specifically stgit-2?
Looking at the upstream project, it doesn't look too bad. Should be
relatively straightforward to package for Fedora, with one caveat.
>
On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 8:20 PM Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 18 2023 at 10:19:24 AM -0800, Gordon Messmer
> wrote:
> > Several people suggested using a weak dependency (Suggests:) on the
> > iscsi driver, but I don't think that would solve the problem for most
> > users because weak d
On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 11:18 AM Michal Konecny wrote:
>
> I would say that the current way is OK, the bot asks fedora-scm-requests
> admins to validate the requests, because it is marked as exception.
> After being validated it gets created.
>
> Or if there should be an exception for Rust package
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 12:38 PM Pete Walter wrote:
>
> I am not happy about dropping Fedora packages in favor of upstream Flatpaks
> either.
>
> Can you assign the package to me instead of retiring it? I can get it updated
> so we can keep it in Fedora.
It looks like Bottles itself doesn't con
On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 12:15 AM Sandro wrote:
>
> Having read all the responses, I'm more inclined to head down the road
> of orphanage, giving other people a chance to adopt the package. Due to
> my limited knowledge of (packaging) Rust, I don't feel I'm the right
> person to be main admin for B
On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 12:03 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 28, 2023 at 01:49:17PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 28, 2023 at 09:03:35PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > >
> > > This is indeed a shortcoming in the rpm symbol dependency generation
>
On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 5:20 AM Orion Poplawski wrote:
>
> As a heads up - openmpi 5.0.0 drops support for 32-bit builds [1]. I'm
> not sure how far away it is from release - we're on rc10 at the moment.
>
> Affected packages seem to be:
>
> amg4psblas-1.1.0-4.fc38.src.rpm
> arbor-0.7-4.fc38.src.r
On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 11:53 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 08:11:41PM +, upda...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
> > The following comment has been added to the systemd-253~rc2-2.fc38 update:
>
> >Bugs: 2156900 - None
> > Notes: Automatic update for s
On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 1:53 PM Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 1:16 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 09:37:44PM -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
>> > Now I'm getting bit by the rpmautospec and COPR issue.
>>
>> Please be more precise. How are you b
On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 6:27 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> I have just realized, that the rpmautospec is not documented in the
> guidelines (unless my search-fu is failing me). Therefore I consider it
> strange that we should go from "no documentation at all" to "use it by
> default". I don't think thi
On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 5:05 PM Pete Walter wrote:
>
> Today, we have 3 versions in rawhide (libgit2 was updated from 1.3.x to 1.4.x
> and then 1.5.x over the last month and the compat packages were added today):
>
> libgit2 package with version 1.5.1 (security supported still from upstream)
> lib
On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 11:24 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 6:49 PM Josh Stone wrote:
> >
> > On 11/22/22 8:13 AM, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > > List of Rust library-only packages,
> > >
> > > - rust-rustfilt
> >
&g
Hello fellow Rustaceans and / or frustrated Rust packagers,
My work on the "next generation" of Rust packaging tools has finally
progressed to the point where it can be tested by actual people. :)
Adding support for new features of cargo - "namespaced dependencies"
(`dep:foo`) and "weak dependenc
On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 3:08 PM Dan Horák wrote:
>
> On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 07:19:38 -0600
> Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> > I currently have to disable tests for s390x[1] (and ppc64le) for likely
> > endianess issues.
> >
> > Troubleshooting these is more than a little outside of my wheelhouse.
> >
> > I
On Sat, Feb 11, 2023 at 2:40 AM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> Hello fellow Rustaceans and / or frustrated Rust packagers,
>
> My work on the "next generation" of Rust packaging tools has finally
> progressed to the point where it can be tested by actual people. :)
Afte
On Sat, Feb 18, 2023, 18:20 Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 2023-02-18 04:40, Björn Persson wrote:
> > The Detailed Description describes the problem thoroughly, but fails to
> > describe the solution.
>
> Thanks. I'll make sure that it does before formally proposing it,
> assuming that we proceed t
On Sun, Feb 19, 2023 at 1:22 AM Gordon Messmer wrote:
>
> On 2023-02-18 15:53, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > I see a big hole in that problem (assuming that I understand Things
> > correctly): What happens to packages where this .so.x.y.z pattern does
> > not match their act
On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 6:43 PM Julian Sikorski wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> FTBFS bug was filed against mame [1]. Unfortunately, the corresponding
> build [2] has already been deleted. This is not ideal from maintainer
> perspective as it effectively is a bug with no info provided whatsoever.
> Not to m
On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 7:15 PM Orion Poplawski wrote:
>
> On 2/20/23 10:46, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 6:43 PM Julian Sikorski wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> FTBFS bug was filed against mame [1]. Unfortunately, the corre
On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 9:40 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 10:56:30AM -0800, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> > On 2023-02-20 10:01, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > >Does it have to be something which looks so much like it might be a
> > >version number? For example it could be he
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Tuesday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on
irc.libera.chat.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2023-02-21 17:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be di
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCo (2023-02-21)
===
Meeting started by decathorpe at 17:00:46 UTC. The full logs are
available at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2023-02-21/fesco.2023-02-21-17.00.log.html
Meeting summary
---
On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 9:48 PM Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> I was asked to weigh in on https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7215 as a
> priority. Last time we talked about this we didn't really get anywhere...
>
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/JYKVELSBJ
On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 5:44 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 22. 02. 23 17:27, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > I just found out about this change yesterday. I suspect it's a
> > security-driven requirement, so I don't know how much room there will
> > be for changes. I'll pass this on to the Bugzilla team and
On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 6:43 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 8:02 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 7:55 AM Petr Pisar wrote:
> > >
> > > pkgconf-1.9.4-1.fc39, comparing to 1.8.0-6.fc39, changed a soname without
> > > a notice on this list. Affected packages:
On Sat, Feb 25, 2023 at 7:41 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 06:00:08AM +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > On Tue, 2023-02-21 at 16:40 -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > > As of today, F38 Changes should be 100% complete. Change owners can
> > > indicate this by setting the Bugzilla tracke
On Sun, Feb 26, 2023 at 9:48 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 25, 2023 at 07:53:57PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 25, 2023 at 7:41 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 06:00:08AM +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > &
On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 10:51 AM Paul Howarth wrote:
>
> On Sat, 25 Feb 2023 10:41:37 -0800
> Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 06:00:08AM +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2023-02-21 at 16:40 -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > > > As of today, F38 Changes should be 100% complete.
On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 7:36 PM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 06:28:56PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > I've spent the day fixing various issues in qemu on Rawhide, but
> > there's one remaining issue. The tests stubbornly fail on i686. It
> > seems as if there is s
Hi all,
$SUBJECT is now happening for (at least) the second time with F38. It
looks like the packit service is mis-configured and does not submit
any builds updates for "branched":
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?user=packit
Having updates in Fedora 37 (stable branch) and Rawhide (devel
On Wed, Mar 1, 2023 at 5:34 PM Matej Focko wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> we have already been informed about the issue and fix for the issue is
> ready (will be deployed to production next Tuesday, unless we hit any
> issues in the staging instance)
>
> https://github.com/packit/packit/pull/1863
>
> Thi
On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 3:47 PM Tomas Tomecek wrote:
>
> Hi Fabio, answers inline below.
>
> On Wed, Mar 1, 2023 at 5:50 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 1, 2023 at 5:34 PM Matej Focko wrote:
>>
>> - linux-system-roles v1.35.1: submitted to F39
On Fri, Mar 3, 2023 at 2:34 PM Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 3 2023 at 12:03:12 PM +, Daniel P. Berrangé
> wrote:
> > Yes, this whole episode makes me want to kill off i686 builds of
> > everything
> > I maintain, even when its not a leaf package. I only spent time
> > investigatin
On Sat, Mar 4, 2023, 02:21 Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Fri, 2023-03-03 at 15:31 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >
> > Interestingly, this is only the case for the F38 update. Check the F39
> > update:
> > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-23789cd657
> >
> > it's *only* in @criti
On Sun, Mar 5, 2023 at 1:31 AM David Michael wrote:
>
> Okay, thanks for all the feedback. I interpret this as essentially
> requiring the use of the glibc Rust target for inclusion in Fedora, so
> the changes on the Fedora side would be reduced to adding a couple
> dozen crates and ideally suppo
Hello fellow packagers,
Yep, it's that time of the release cycle again. What should be do
about all the packages that are stuck at older versions in f38 than
what's available on f37? If you see your package in the list below
(with my description of what seems to be wrong with it), please ensure
th
Hi all,
As a follow-up from a recent discussion on Matrix/IRC, I'm proposing
the following change to the development cycle / release schedule:
"Koji builds are blocked while mass branching and updates-testing
enablement are in progress."
That's it, that's the entire RFC.
Roughly every six month
On Thu, Mar 9, 2023 at 12:38 PM Tomas Hrcka wrote:
>
> > One problem that I haven't seen before is that updates are apparently
> > in "testing" or "testing->stable" state in bodhi, but aren't available
> > from the "updates-testing" repository at all. No wonder these updates
> > aren't getting any
On Thu, Mar 9, 2023 at 2:44 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 9, 2023 at 12:38 PM Tomas Hrcka wrote:
> >
> > > One problem that I haven't seen before is that updates are apparently
> > > in "testing" or "testing->stable" st
On Thu, Mar 9, 2023 at 3:25 PM Jitka Plesnikova wrote:
>
>
> > - perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-0:5.20230220-1.fc37 >
> > perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-0:5.20230120-1.fc38
> > - perl-Module-CoreList-1:5.20230220-1.fc37 >
> > perl-Module-CoreList-1:5.20230120-1.fc38
> Newer builds are in testing, because there
On Thu, Mar 9, 2023 at 3:28 PM Björn Persson wrote:
>
> What will packagers see?
This is still up for discussion, I guess. And it will also depend on
how this can be implemented.
Ideally, "fedpkg build" would print a warning like "Mass branching is
in progress, no builds can be submitted at this
On Thu, Mar 9, 2023 at 3:46 PM Dennis Gilmore via devel
wrote:
>
>> 2. Builds launched just before updates-testing enablement can get
>> stuck in "testing" state before there is an actual updates-testing
>> repo, and are hence not available from *any* repository (for testing?)
>> during the beta f
On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 9:40 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 18. 07. 24 1:30, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > You are conflating license tag conversion with a license audit. Tag
> > conversion is explicitly*not* an audit exercise.
>
> No, I state the old GPL tags and the new GPL identifiers have different
>
On Fri, Jul 19, 2024 at 8:57 PM Kilian Hanich via devel
wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I am just following this discussion out of interested and this is kinda
> off-topic, but I have a question: Why is that?
>
> Am 19.07.24 um 11:05 schrieb Marián Konček:
> > Gradle is not a preferred build system in Fedor
On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 4:28 PM Clemens Lang wrote:
>
> Hi Neal,
>
>
> > On 22. Jul 2024, at 15:01, Neal Gompa wrote:
> >
> > The CentOS approach isn't a deprecation, it's flat out removal. It's a
> > completely different change.
>
> This isn’t correct. The headers are removed, but the ABI is sti
On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 8:04 PM Emanuel Lima wrote:
>
> It's kata-containers. It works from 1.75 to 1.78 but not with 1.79.
>
> I opened an issue upstream:
> https://github.com/kata-containers/kata-containers/issues/10067
You can't (and really shouldn't) want to build with an older Rust
version j
On Wed, Aug 7, 2024, 10:28 Neal Gompa wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> pkgconf 2.3.0 just released and the jump from 2.1.1 to 2.3.0 brings
> with us a soname bump. I will be updating pkgconf and rebuilding
> dependents in a side-tag, and hopefully get everything done later
> today.
>
> The identified packag
On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 4:33 PM Marek Kasik wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've fixed this issue and rebuilt Inkscape.
>
> Unfortunately, I have issues with some other packages due to the
> unannounced soname bump of re2. qt5-qtwebengine needs to be rebuilt due
> to that but it fails. I watch the
> https://sr
On Sun, Aug 18, 2024 at 5:23 PM Andrew Bauer
wrote:
>
> Thanks everyone for the great responses.
>
> I'll certainly check out the Matrix room if I have to, but I was hoping I
> could do this in a way that allows me to directly reference any responses I
> get via link in the following new package
On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 4:08 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> As the SPDX Change slowly finishes I focused on the license that I regularly
> report as:
>
> warning: not valid neither as Callaway nor as SPDX, please check
(snip)
I was finally able to set aside some time to look at this.
> rust-bt
On Sun, Aug 25, 2024 at 9:18 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> Here is the second batch of changes for 1000 packages
> (golang-github-danwakefield-fnmatch to perl-Image-Xbm)
>
> https://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/rest-of-callaway-batch2-normal-diff.txt
>
> Shorten version without the context is here:
>
On Sun, Sep 1, 2024 at 5:31 PM Dridi Boukelmoune
wrote:
>
> > I made the scripts end with something written to stderr followed by an
> > explicit "exit 1", and I can see the error message, but then it just
> > succeeds. So my question is how to make RPM register that a dependency
> > generator fai
On Mon, Sep 2, 2024 at 12:21 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> Do you want to make Fedora 41 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
> try to run:
>
> dnf --releasever=41 --enablerepo=updates-testing --assumeno distro-sync
>
> This command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will
On Thu, Sep 5, 2024 at 12:01 PM Michael J Gruber wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Martin Gansser venit, vidit, dixit 2024-09-05 11:41:04:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have created a new package pyliblo3.spec [1] and would like to know how to
> > create a rpm-autospec` based package from it.
>
> welcome to the club :
On Fri, Sep 6, 2024 at 12:48 PM Ben Beasley wrote:
>
> On 9/5/24 12:06 PM, Przemek Klosowski via devel wrote:
>
> > Do you think that is a technical decision, based e.g. on dependencies
> > they need, or a business decision to use the app store? It's their
> > right to choose, but I'm curious whet
On Mon, Sep 9, 2024 at 9:57 AM Alexander Ploumistos
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 9, 2024 at 3:30 AM Huzaifa Sidhpurwala
> wrote:
> >
> >>
> > Great, can you pls ask for permissions there? I can approve it.
>
> Are you sure it can work this way? For the packages I'm the
> maintainer, there is a setting
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Tuesday at 17:00 UTC in #meeting:fedoraproject.org
on Matrix.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2024-09-10 17:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be
=
# #meeting:fedoraproject.org: fesco
=
Meeting started by @decathorpe:fedora.im at 2024-09-10 17:02:11
Meeting summary
---
* TOPIC: Init Process (@decathorpe:fedora.im, 17:02:34)
* TOPIC: #3264 Incomplete Changes
On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 10:26 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Can these reports not be wrapped to 80 lines or wrapped in a way the
> wrapping respect the nesting? The wrapping makes them hard to read.
>
> Thank for considering.
I assume you mean 80 columns, not 80 lines?
In fact, the email as it was s
On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 5:26 PM Ron Olson wrote:
>
>
> Hey all, I’m trying to get bdftopcf built for EPEL 10 but it’s failing with
> the aforementioned error (No matching package to install:
> 'pkgconfig(xorg-macros) >= 1.8). I guess I don’t understand what kind of
> package this is, and who to
On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 5:09 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>
> Dne 11. 09. 24 v 16:41 Fabio Valentini napsal(a):
> > Doing line-wrapping by hand instead of letting my mail client do this
> > would be a lot of work.
>
> I'd appreciate if *my* email client had a chance t
On Mon, Jul 3, 2023 at 10:16 AM Jan Grulich wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> po 26. 6. 2023 v 19:26 odesílatel Fabio Valentini
> napsal:
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 6:21 PM Aoife Moloney wrote:
>> >
>>
>> (snip)
>>
>> >
>> > ==
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 10:32 AM Matthew Miller
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 09:46:26AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > I don't think there's a formal change filed yet.
> >
> > Matthew: Did you want to do that? Or would you like me or someone else
> > to do so?
>
> I would love someone else to
On Wed, Jul 5, 2023, 00:07 Maxwell G wrote:
> On Tue Jul 4, 2023 at 23:45 +0200, Sandro wrote:
>
> > I see one of my packages, python-fvs, in the list of failed builds. I'm
> > also one of the maintainers of Bottles, which requires python-fvs.
> > Bottles itself is mostly Python code. I would ha
On Wed, Jul 5, 2023 at 8:23 AM Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote:
>
> I have submitted a Flock proposal to have a common discussion session for
> (modern) Language SIGs. I think for this to be successful we need
> representatives from various Language SIGs to be there (Rust, Haskell, OCaml,
> Golang an
On Wed, Jul 5, 2023 at 10:01 AM Paul Howarth wrote:
>
> Whatever this is, it's intermittent and it's still happening. I'm
> getting koschei reports about failed builds with this symptom every
> day, and yesterday I had a "real" build fail in that way too:
Yeah this is happening pretty frequently
On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 10:06 PM Mikel Olasagasti wrote:
>
(snip)
>
> > golang-github-moby-spdystreamgo-sig, mikelo2
>
> Builds fine in Koschei and no BZ
>
> > golang-github-openapi-validate alexsaezm, go-sig
>
> Builds fine in Koschei and no BZ
This is usually an indicati
On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 6:26 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
>
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-8d5b08b005
>
> I don't understand what this update is waiting on / why it cannot go
> to Fedora immediately.
>
> I waived the tests.
>
> There are still apparently 5 tests "running",
On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 6:37 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 6:26 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> >
> > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-8d5b08b005
> >
> > I don't understand what this update is waiting on / w
On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 10:46 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
>
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-129c8286a0
>
> This one seems a bit different. There seem to be no tests running.
> The test gating status is "ignored" (I didn't do that). And otherwise
> it seems to be doing no
On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 1:01 PM Mikel Olasagasti wrote:
>
> Hau idatzi du Fabio Valentini (decatho...@gmail.com) erabiltzaileak
> (2023 uzt. 12(a), az. (11:53)):
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 10:06 PM Mikel Olasagasti
> > wrote:
> > >
> >
>
On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 10:33 AM Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> Fedora lists are hostile to upstream collaboration via cross-posting, so
> I can only forward this for your information.
>
> This causes problems with the i686 builders.
I wonder how this only started to happen recently? Has something
cha
On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 2:53 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 8:29 AM Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 10:33 AM Florian Weimer wrote:
> > >
> > > Fedora lists are hostile to upstream collaboration via cross-posting, so
&g
On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 5:25 PM Demi Marie Obenour
wrote:
>
> On 7/5/23 02:22, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote:
> > I have submitted a Flock proposal to have a common discussion session for
> > (modern) Language SIGs. I think for this to be successful we need
> > representatives from various Language SI
On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 6:09 PM Demi Marie Obenour
wrote:
>
> On 7/13/23 11:52, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> > On 7/13/23 11:32, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 5:25 PM Demi Marie Obenour
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On
Hi all,
I'm opening this thread to trigger discussion of the roadmap for DNF5
in Fedora 39 - whether the switch still looks doable for this release,
or whether it should be reverted for F39 and postponed to F40.
This is also being tracked in a FESCo ticket:
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3039
The
On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 10:45 PM Eric Sandeen wrote:
>
> On 7/14/23 6:53 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > * Neal Gompa:
> >
> >> On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 8:29 AM Fabio Valentini
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 10:33 AM
701 - 800 of 1943 matches
Mail list logo
