On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 1:01 PM Mikel Olasagasti <mi...@olasagasti.info> wrote: > > Hau idatzi du Fabio Valentini (decatho...@gmail.com) erabiltzaileak > (2023 uzt. 12(a), az. (11:53)): > > > > On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 10:06 PM Mikel Olasagasti <mi...@olasagasti.info> > > wrote: > > > > > > > (snip) > > > > > > > > > golang-github-moby-spdystream go-sig, mikelo2 > > > > > > Builds fine in Koschei and no BZ > > > > > > > golang-github-openapi-validate alexsaezm, go-sig > > > > > > Builds fine in Koschei and no BZ > > > > This is usually an indication that the package fails to even produce a > > valid SRPM file (i.e. "fedpkg srpm" fails). > > In this case, mass rebuild will skip it, no FTBFS bug will be filed, > > and koschei will keep using the last "known good" SRPM from koji. > > Both packages work for me. I'm doing the following: > > $ fedpkg clone golang-github-moby-spdystream > $ cd golang-github-moby-spdystream > $ fedpkg srpm > $ mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 > /tmp/golang-github-openapi-validate/golang-github-openapi-validate-0.20.1-5.fc39.src.rpm
If that is indeed the case, then the missing f38 build was likely caused by a hiccup during the f38 mass rebuild. To get the package off the "long term FTBFS retirements" list, all that would be needed is to run "fedpkg build". Fabio _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
