Re: [HEADS UP] F33 Boost 1.73.0 rebuilds starting in a side tag

On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 2:16 PM Jonathan Wakely wrote: > I've literally just started. The new boost hasn't even finished yet: > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=45094034 I wonder if this build is actually broken and if it will ever finish: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/ta

Re: new packages review tickets

On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 6:58 PM Mattia Verga via devel wrote: > > Il 24/05/20 15:41, Igor Raits ha scritto: > > > > This is great idea! If you need any help with bugzilla API or anything > > like that - let me know. > > > > > Yeah, I think I need some help in getting flags resetted. > > I would li

Re: How to determine maintainer of a package en mass?

On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 1:16 AM Richard Shaw wrote: > > Specifically, I would like a way to determine which packages I am the sole > maintainer of or the main maintainer. > > Long story short, I've been spending far too much time on packaging work and > it's taking away from $LIFE, $DAYJOB, and

Re: python3-pyparsing: conflicting error

On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 2:29 PM Jun Aruga wrote: > > This just happened on Fedora rawhide build now. > > Could anyone fix it? > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=45138807 > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/8880/45138880/root.log > > DEBUG util.py:600: No matches

Re: Has something changed with RPMS?

On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 4:38 AM Adam Williamson wrote: > > On June 1, 2020 7:13:51 p.m. PDT, Richard Shaw wrote: > >I've noticed lately when doing mock builds that it takes a lot longer > >to > >install all the dependencies. Especially large -devel packages with > >tons of > >small files (boost-de

Orphaned: vocal

Hi everybody, I have just orphaned vocal. It's a GTK3 Podcast client / player written in Vala. I think it's my number one package when counting ABRT crash reports, and the upstream project has been "close to a massive 3.0 bugfix release" for a year, so I'd not hold my breath for those ... I've a

Orphaned: libdbusmenu

Hi everybody, I have just orphaned libdbusmenu. Some of my packages (particularly some Pantheon components) previously depended on it (via libunity), but both dependencies are now obsolete and I don't need the package any longer. I only picked up libdbusmenu because it was orphaned at the time (b

Re: Orphaned: libdbusmenu

On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 3:47 PM Leigh Scott wrote: > > Can you assign me as main-admin please? Done. Though I'm not sure if spending time on keeping a dead package alive instead of pestering upstreams to drop the dependency makes sense :) Fabio > ___ >

Re: System-Wide Change proposal: CompilerPolicy Change

On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 9:11 PM Jeff Law wrote: > Yes. I thought we bumped up that bug in the database so that it'd get some > attention in the gcc-10 cycle. But I couldn't follow it myself, so I don't > know > what happened. Sorry for being off-topic, but can you (Jeff) please not respond to t

Is there a process for EPEL 7/8 FTBFS issues?

Hi everybody, Over time, I've encountered some packages that fail to build on EPEL7 / EPEL8, in some cases, like since forever. Is there an equivalent to the FTBFS cleanup in rawhide / fedora N+1 for EPEL branches? Or are those packages just left to rot? Two examples: - assertj-core (seems to be

Re: Schedule for Mondays's FESCo Meeting (2020-06-08) — proposal to cancel

On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 1:37 PM Petr Šabata wrote: > > Hi, > > while we have some open tickets, we're waiting for the Modularity > presentation later this week. In the meantime, the discussion > continues in the tickets. There doesn't appear to be anything else to > discuss today so I'm proposing w

Re: 500 packages FTBFS in rawhide with java-11-openjdk as system JDK

On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 4:05 PM Jiri Vanek wrote: > Please see > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Java11#common_issues_packagers_can_face_and_gathered_solutions > Please fix your packages according to > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Java11#copr_preliminary_rebuild > Inidivdual packag

Re: 500 packages FTBFS in rawhide with java-11-openjdk as system JDK

On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 4:52 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 4:05 PM Jiri Vanek wrote: > > Please see > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Java11#common_issues_packagers_can_face_and_gathered_solutions > > Please fix your package

Re: [fedora-java] 500 packages FTBFS in rawhide with java-11-openjdk as system JDK

On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 6:34 PM Jiri Vanek wrote: > > On 6/9/20 4:42 PM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote: > > Hey Jiri, > > Please guide me how to find the actual build failure log. I tried finding > > the ant one but didn't > > succeed yet > > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jvanek/java11/pack

Re: Orphaned 215 packages

On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 6:30 PM Ben Rosser wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 5:38 PM Jared K. Smith > wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 3:41 PM Ben Rosser wrote: > >> > >> So... this is a lot of node.js packages, and I haven't really seen any > >> discussion of this on the lists. And at

Re: Orphaned 215 packages

On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 6:50 PM Ben Rosser wrote: > Hi Fabio, > > I'm not sure how much time I'll be able to put in, but I'd be very > happy to (help) work on this, either as part of the Stewardship or > Nodejs SIGs, or both. Hopefully others interested in the nodejs > ecosystem (Sérgio and Jared,

Orphaned seven (mostly) unused Java packages

I have just orphaned seven (mostly) unused packages that were previously maintained by the Stewardship SIG. - felix-bundlerepository: now an unused leaf package in rawhide - felix-osgi-obr: only required by felix-bundlerepository - felix-shell: only required by felix-bundlerepository - joda-conver

Re: Bodhi 5.4.0 in production

On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 9:58 AM Clement Verna wrote: > > Hi all, > > I have just deployed Bodhi 5.4.0 > (https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/releases) in production. We were > running 5.2.2 so that deployment brings the improvement and bug fixes from > 5.3.0 and 5.4.0 (see release notes) > >

Re: RHEL 9 and modularity

On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 2:31 PM Josh Boyer wrote: > On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 8:01 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > What makes RHEL so different that the failure is not relevant to it? Is it > > the > > stable nature of RHEL content? Is it the limited scope of RHEL content? Is > > it > > the less "wi

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: Make nano the default editor

On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 8:50 PM Jan Kratochvil wrote: > > On Thu, 25 Jun 2020 19:18:59 +0200, Ben Cotton wrote: > > In contrast, Nano offers the kind of graphical text editing experience > > that people are used to, > > This is another step trying to make Fedora end-user friendly while the only >

Re: User experience issue on btrfs

On Sun, Jun 28, 2020, 16:04 Neal Gompa wrote: > On Sun, Jun 28, 2020 at 9:57 AM Michael Catanzaro > wrote: > > > > (fixing the subject line to not mention nano) > > > > On Sun, Jun 28, 2020 at 5:16 am, alexandrebfar...@gmail.com wrote: > > > Don't expect much love on this, since my opinion has b

Re: [fedora-java] Re: java stack is dead, long live the javastack (was "500 packages FTBFS in rawhide with java-11-openjdk as system JDK")

On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 9:52 AM Jiri Vanek wrote: > > On 6/29/20 1:59 PM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 2:39 PM Jiri Vanek > > wrote: > > > > Current stats from my testing samples: > > 408 failing > > 263 passing > > > > > > A

Re: [fedora-java] Re: java stack is dead, long live the javastack (was "500 packages FTBFS in rawhide with java-11-openjdk as system JDK")

On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 3:09 PM Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote: > > Fabio, does it mean that the Java SIG agrees with progressing with the Change > to Java 11 as a default? Speaking for myself, yes. I can't speak for all other SIG members (we haven't formally voted on this or something like that), bu

Re: Mass spec change: Replace Python version globs with macros to support 3.10

On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 2:50 PM Tomas Hrnciar wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > with the upcoming Python 3.10 update we need to update Python 3 version globs > in Fedora specfiles. The reason is simple, Python version will be one > character longer so the currently omnipresent ?.? glob won't work a

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: Make btrfs the default file system for desktop variants

On Sun, Jun 28, 2020 at 7:54 PM Gerald B. Cox wrote: > And? I don't know about you, when dealing with file systems a chart with OK, > Mostly OK and Unstable doesn't give me the warm and fuzzies. Especially when > OK is defined as: "should be safe to use, no known major defficiencies" . > "S

Re: [fedora-java] Questions on an update to javamail in ursine

On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 4:06 PM Jie Kang wrote: > > Hi all, > > javamail ursine is using version 1.5.2 while there are some module > streams at 1.6.x > > The upstream project also moved to the eclipse foundation and these > 1.6.x releases have different exports for OSGi, making an update to > them

Re: [fedora-java] Re: java stack is dead, long live the javastack (was "500 packages FTBFS in rawhide with java-11-openjdk as system JDK")

On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 4:00 PM Jiri Vanek wrote: > > On 7/1/20 3:21 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 3:09 PM Aleksandar Kurtakov > > wrote: > >> > >> Fabio, does it mean that the Java SIG agrees with progressing with the

Re: [heads-up] soname version bump for evolution-data-server in rawhide

On Fri, Jul 3, 2020 at 8:10 AM Milan Crha wrote: > > Hello, > I'm sorry for a late notice, the 3.37.3 release (will be done today) of > the evolution-data-server has a soname version bump on the > libedataserver library. It has a change on an EWebDAVSession API, which > I do not think is u

Re: [heads-up] soname version bump for evolution-data-server in rawhide

On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 11:52 AM Milan Crha wrote: > > On Tue, 2020-07-07 at 09:05 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: > > Right, I saw that too and didn't understand why that single test > > fails. When I built folks locally it passed with no problem, using > > the same evolution-data-server. I'd surely rebu

Orphaning my golang packages

Hi everybody, I have to finally admit that I'll never again be able to play catch-up with the ever-changing sprawling go library dependency tree of syncthing. I have switched to using bundled dependencies for syncthing ~years ago already, and I do not have the time nor the energy to do the amount

Re: [fedora-java] Mass rebuild for f33-java11 side tag completed

On Sat, Jul 11, 2020 at 10:26 AM Jiri Vanek wrote: > > Hello! > > toatal packages: 610 > passed: 427 > failed: 176 > > From the failures, there is 29 which passed in the copr before, and now are > thus failing from two > reasons - unrelated change, or non-intel64-arch failure. I will put this to

Re: PostgreSQL 13 - Fedora 33 Self-Contained Change proposal

On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 9:17 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > == Upgrade/compatibility impact == > The PostgreSQL client library (libpq component) is compatible, so > there shouldn't be any issues, but rebuild of the depended components > is better to be sure. There is a > [https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/

Re: [fedora-java] Re: Mass rebuild for f33-java11 side tag completed

On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 5:55 PM Mat Booth wrote: > Any update? Any thoughts on when you want to merge the f33-java11 side tag > back into rawhide? I second this, please don't wait two weeks [0] for merging the side tag, it's only going to cause merge conflict problems with packages that get rebu

Re: Mass rebuild for f33-java11 side tag completed

On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 2:24 PM Mat Booth wrote: > > On Fri, 17 Jul 2020 at 09:34, Christian Heimes wrote: > > > > > Hello! > > > > > > toatal packages: 610 > > > passed: 427 > > > failed: 176 > > > > > > From the failures, there is 29 which passed in the copr before, and now > > > are thus fail

Re: [fedora-java] Re: Mass rebuild for f33-java11 side tag completed

On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 11:25 AM Jiri Vanek wrote: > > >> > >> Any update? Any thoughts on when you want to merge the f33-java11 side tag > >> back into rawhide? > > done > >> > > > > BTW There are some packages, e.g. built by ant with no sauce/target level > > specified at all, that are > > bui

[HEADS-UP] OpenJDK 11 is now the default Java in rawhide

(Sending this heads-up in a new thread for better visibility.) Yesterday the f33-java11 side tag was merged into rawhide, which brings the necessary changes to make java-11-openjdk the default Java in fedora. All packages depending on Java should also have been rebuilt in this side tag. The "new"

Re: How do Fedora developers get access to devtoolset for testing.

On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 12:14 AM Steven Munroe wrote: > > Dave Love; writes: > ... > > I'm pretty sure I said to do that a while ago, like I did when > > testing the trivial patch that I didn't expect to cause such trouble. > > You probably did say so ;) > > I come from a different culture and exp

Re: Dropping elfutils-libelf-devel-static and elfutils-devel-static subpackages

On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 1:25 AM Mark Wielaard wrote: > > Hi, > > On Tue, 2020-07-21 at 15:21 -0700, Josh Stone wrote: > > On 7/21/20 3:12 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote: > > > > > Is there a procedure to follow for dropping these sub-packages, or can > > > > > I simply remove them from the spec file? > >

Re: Policy for Modules in Fedora and Fedora ELN - Fedora 33 Self-Contained Change proposal

On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 8:01 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ModularPolicy > > == Summary == > Establish a set of rules for Modular content in Fedora to ensure an > optimal user and packager experience. > > == Owner == > * Name: [[User:Sgallagh| Stephen Gallagher]] >

Very strange compiler/linker related build failures in rawhide

Hi all, I'm starting to see various very strange kinds of build failures in rawhide, that seem to have started with either of these updates (or a combination of them): - annobin 9.21-1.fc33 → 9.22-1.fc33 - binutils 2.34.0-6.fc33 → 2.34.0-7.fc33 - elfutils 0.179-2.fc33 → 0.180-2.fc33 - glibc 2.31.

Re: Very strange compiler/linker related build failures in rawhide

On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 10:45 AM Stephan Bergmann wrote: > > Does somebody have a clue what's going on here? It's currently > > blocking rawhide composes because libreoffice fails to build / > > install. > > (The LibreOffice build failure is tracked at >

Re: Very strange compiler/linker related build failures in rawhide

On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 11:23 AM Hans de Goede wrote: > > Hi, > > On 7/24/20 10:31 AM, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I'm starting to see various very strange kinds of build failures in > > rawhide, that seem to have started with either of th

Re: Dropping elfutils-libelf-devel-static and elfutils-devel-static subpackages

On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 4:56 PM Mark Wielaard wrote: > > Hi, > > On Thu, 2020-07-23 at 09:59 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 1:25 AM Mark Wielaard > > > I committed the removal of the two static subpackages and added an > > > Obsolet

Re: Very strange compiler/linker related build failures in rawhide

On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 5:11 PM Jeff Law wrote: > > One error I've seen in libreoffice is a gcc / annobin segfault: > > > > [build CXX] vcl/unx/gtk3/gtk3gtkinst.cxx > > *** WARNING *** there are active plugins, do not report this as a bug > > unless you can reproduce it without enabling any plugin

Re: Very strange compiler/linker related build failures in rawhide

On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 5:48 PM Jeff Law wrote: > > On Fri, 2020-07-24 at 17:44 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 5:11 PM Jeff Law wrote: > > > > One error I've seen in libreoffice is a gcc / annobin segfault: > > > > > &g

Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2020-07-29)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Wednesday at 14:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-2 on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2020-07-29 14:00 UTC' Links to all issues to

Re: libdc1394: Unannounced soname bump?

On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 9:14 PM Till Hofmann wrote: > > > > On 7/27/20 2:28 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: > > I just got a BZ on OpenImageIO due to inability to install the -devel > > package, > > > > Upon inspection it looks like the soname was bumped but a rebuild of > > OIIO was not performed. > > >

Re: How do Fedora developers get access to devtoolset for testing.

On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 9:03 PM Steven Munroe wrote: > > Dave Love writes: > > > It surprises me if that's IBM experience, and it's a bit worrying for our > > new system. > > I no longer speak for IBM (retired) so more of a personal Linux for POWER > opinion. But the Advance Toolchain (AT) provi

Re: Download all build artifacts from a scratch build?

On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 3:31 PM Richard Shaw wrote: > > I'm working on fixing a package but I have to use scratch builds because the > tests only pass when running on koji, not a local mock build. It produces > several rpms which I'd like to download for testing purposes. > > Currently I have to

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2020-07-29)

= #fedora-meeting-2: FESCo (2020-07-29) = Meeting started by decathorpe at 14:00:24 UTC. The full logs are available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2020-07-29/fesco.2020-07-29-14.00.log.html . Meetin

Re: Fedora 25 defaults to X instead of wayland

I seem to have a similar problem. My configuration *could* be mistakenly identified as hybrid graphics (Intel iGPU and Nvidia discrete GPU present), but the iGPU is explicitly disabled (in the UEFI configuration) and only the discrete GPU is used for rendering AND output. On fedora 24, I was able

Review Swaps: (mostly) very simple golang packages

Hi everybody, I've been putting together package Review Requests for all the golang package dependencies of syncthing (an open source file synchronization service). Some of them have already been reviewed (thank you, Jan! I feel much more confident about my golang packaging now), but there are sti

Re: libdbusmenu upgrade in Fedora rawhide (and eventually in Fedora 26, 25)

Hi Simone, Updating libdbusmenu seems like a good idea - if you want help rebuilding dependent packages, I can take care of rebuilding my own packages once libdbusmenu is build successfully. My affected packages are (according to your list): appcenter, pantheon-files, pantheon-photos, slingshot-la

Re: What is your opinion on "sudo pip" fix for Fedora 27?

If the "only" reason to change the current behavior is to prevent users from nuking their systems (be it by accident, or by following outdated instructions from the web), then why not prevent running "sudo pip" at all? Adding a small patch to pip to print an explanatory message ("This is unsafe, m

Review Swaps: Simple golang packages (for syncthing)

Hi everybody, I need somebody to take on the Review Requests of the only 3 golang dependencies that are still blocking a syncthing package: golang-github-cznic-zappy: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431743 golang-github-cznic-lldb: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431745

fedpkg new-sources broken?

Right now, I can't build updates or new packages, because "fedpkg new-sources" is getting stuck (for more than 15 minutes) without error message (other than the bodhi deprecation warning) and it doesn't do anything until I kill it ... I can't pin down the exact date it stopped working (since I don

Re: fedpkg new-sources broken?

On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 2:56 PM, Petr Pisar wrote: > On 2017-07-14, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: >> Fabio Valentini wrote on 07/14/2017 06:04 PM: >>> Right now, I can't build updates or new packages, because "fedpkg >>> new-sources" is getting stuck (for more

Self Introduction: Fabio Valentini (decathorpe)

Here goes my introduction as a new (or aspiring) package maintainer for fedora. I have been using fedora as my daily driver OS for some years now (I think starting with f18 or f19). Also, I have been learning to build RPM packages for some time, too - some of you may be familiar with my elementary

Re: Self Introduction: Fabio Valentini (decathorpe)

Hello Dominik, Thanks for the welcome, and for sponsoring me! On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 7:35 PM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski < domi...@greysector.net> wrote: > Hello, Fabio. > Welcome to Fedora community! > > On Thursday, 24 November 2016 at 22:34, Fabio Valen

f25+: vala 0.34.x+ bug causing .vapi file generation for ALL CURRENT PACKAGE BUILDS to be possibly faulty

I has come to my attention that - since the update to vala from the 0.34.x series has made it into the fedora 25(+) repositories - every package that generates .vapi files during build might have done so incorrectly, because of the following bug, which is present in vala releases up to 0.34.3 (also

becoming a co-maintainer of elementary-icon-theme

Hello Johannes, I am working on getting all the elementary apps and pantheon desktop components into fedora and wondered if you could approve my ACL Requests for becoming a co-maintaner of elementary-icon-theme (since that package obviously ties in with the other packages I am now maintaining, see

becoming a co-maintainer of plank

Hello Wesley, I am working on getting all the elementary apps and pantheon desktop components into fedora and wondered if you could approve my ACL Requests for becoming a co-maintaner of plank (since that package is obviously also part of a Pantheon DE and ties in with the other packages I am main

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: ELN Buildroot and Compose

On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 11:47 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 24. 03. 20 19:55, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 6:01 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > >> On 24. 03. 20 16:23, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: > >>> I think your approach to assessment of the Change is not fair. > >> > >> Ouch

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: ELN Buildroot and Compose

On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 3:23 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 25. 03. 20 14:06, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: > >>> By contributing to Fedora Rawhide sources and consuming them as ELN > >>> repositories for testing purposes. > >> > >> The change proposal literally says "There is no user-facing part in t

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change Proposal: ELN Buildroot and Compose V2

On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 4:12 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > There has been a lot of (really good!) discussion on the original > proposal thread, but as it has grown too large to follow anymore, I'm > restarting it. I have made numerous changes

Re: CPE Git Forge Decision

On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 4:00 PM Leigh Griffin wrote: > > > > On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 2:01 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: >> >> On 30. 03. 20 14:13, Neal Gompa wrote: >> > And unlike Alioth, we have*serious* >> > integration across the board with Pagure, and a good chunk of it is >> > not possible to impl

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: java-11-openjdk as system JDK in F33

On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 4:05 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Java11 . > > == Summary == > Update the system JDK in Fedora from java-1.8.0-openjdk to java-11-openjdk. > > == Owner == > * Name: [[User:jvanek| Jiri Vanek]] > * Email: > * Product: java and java stack >

Re: CPE Git Forge Decision

On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 12:24 PM Leigh Griffin wrote: > > > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 7:44 PM Chris Murphy wrote: >> >> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 11:45 AM Adam Williamson >> wrote: >> > >> > On Tue, 2020-03-31 at 13:08 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: >> > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 10:48:55AM -0500, Mi

Re: How to retire a package only for Fedora 32+

On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 12:12 AM Andrew Toskin wrote: > > I'm aware of the `fedpkg retire` command, but that seemingly retires the > package entirely, and even auto pushes the changes to my package repo. (I > will now need to revert this or something -- I'd assumed there would at least > be a pr

Re: How to retire a package only for Fedora 32+

On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 1:42 AM Andrew Toskin wrote: > > > The Guidelines say to run "fedpkg retire" on all branches you want the > > package to be retired on, starting with the oldest one. Since you > > already started with "master", you'll still have to switch to the f32 > > branch and run "fedpk

Orphaned three Java packages

Hi all, We have just orphaned three packages since they are no longer required any other package that's maintained by the Stewardship SIG: - guava20 - jetty-parent - plexus-bsh-factory guava20 is a compat package that should no longer be needed, since the whole machinery that's used for building

Re: Rawhide update from side tag pending for 2 days

On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 8:56 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-d120de33c5 > > This one is a Rawhide update from a side tag, submitted on Sunday > morning which has been in pending for 2 days. (As it's Rawhide it's > supposed to spend 0 days in t

Re: Fedora 32 FTBFS packages to be orphaned in 1 week

On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 1:00 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 29. 03. 20 13:13, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > According to the Fedora's Fails To Build From Source policy: > > > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/ > > > > > > The following packages will b

Re: Rawhide update from side tag pending for 2 days

On Wed, Apr 8, 2020, 11:27 Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at 05:36:44PM -0400, Mohan Boddu wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 2:56 AM Richard W.M. Jones > wrote: > > > > > > > > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-d120de33c5 > > > > I guess it should be a fixed

Re: Rawhide update from side tag pending for 2 days

On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 11:58 AM Clement Verna wrote: > > > > On Wed, 8 Apr 2020 at 11:38, Fabio Valentini wrote: >> >> On Wed, Apr 8, 2020, 11:27 Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at 05:36:44PM -0400, Mohan Boddu wrote: >&g

Re: Why does Koschei not run real builds?

On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 10:55 AM Dan Čermák wrote: > > Hi list, > > my question is pretty much $subject: Why doesn't Koschei kick of > real builds off packages on dependency changes? From my naive POV that > looks like the missing piece to give us the "OBS-experience". Having > that at least in Ra

Re: ocaml-bisect-ppx and related updates

On Thu, Apr 16, 2020, 21:00 Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 10:04:52AM -0600, Jerry James wrote: > > Sorry for the delay. In spite of being stuck in my house, life has > > been amazingly busy lately... > > > > On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 2:32 PM Richard W.M. Jones > wrote: > > >

Unannounced SONAME bump: libxc.so.5 → libxc.so.9

Hi everybody, The latest rawhide update of libxc (5.0.0) bumped the SONAME as mentioned in $SUBJECT. None of the depending packages have been rebuilt against this version: - cp2k - elk - gpaw - psi4 - python-pyscf - votca-xtp Affected maintainers added to CC. Fabio

Re: Unannounced SONAME bump: libxc.so.5 → libxc.so.9

On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 3:22 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > Hi everybody, > > The latest rawhide update of libxc (5.0.0) bumped the SONAME as > mentioned in $SUBJECT. > > None of the depending packages have been rebuilt against this version: > > - cp2k > - elk >

Co-Maintainers wanted for python-lockfile EPEL branches

Hi everybody, I took over python-lockfile some time ago because it was FTBFS in fedora / orphaned at the time, but it's a dependency of some of my packages. However, I have zero interest in maintaining the EPEL branches of that package, because I have no packages in EPEL myself, and it seems I ca

Re: Automatic tools for soname bumps

On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 10:55 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 22. 04. 20 10:25, Susi Lehtola wrote: > > Hello, > > > > > > first, I'm sorry for a partial screw-up of the libxc soname bump > > announcement. > > It appears I am not alone: there are a few soname bumps each month, many of > > them > >

Re: [SONAME bump] json-c-0.14 (libjson-c.so.4 -> 5)

On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 8:28 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 22. 04. 20 20:16, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: > > Am Mittwoch, den 22.04.2020, 20:02 +0200 schrieb Miro Hrončok: > >> On 22. 04. 20 19:47, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: > >>> Hi Dan, > >>> > >>> I created the list of packages with the fo

Re: HEADS UP: repoquery --whatrequires yields incomplete results when run from Fedora 32+

On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 10:03 PM Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > > > > On 4/3/20 4:47 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 11. 03. 20 17:25, Miro Hrončok wrote: > >> I have upgraded to Fedora 32 today and after a while I have noticed > >> that `repoquery --whatrequires` yields incomplete results. > >> >

Re: Co-Maintainers wanted for python-lockfile EPEL branches

On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 1:45 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > Hi everybody, > > I took over python-lockfile some time ago because it was FTBFS in > fedora / orphaned at the time, but it's a dependency of some of my > packages. > > However, I have zero interest in mai

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers (anaconda also affected)

On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 6:35 AM Markku Korkeala wrote: > > On 4/27/20 1:39 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they > > are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know > > for sure > > that the package should be retired, pl

Re: Co-Maintainers wanted for python-lockfile EPEL branches

On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 7:34 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 01:58:43PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 1:45 PM Fabio Valentini > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi everybody, > > > > > > I took over

Schedule for Monday's FESCo Meeting (2020-05-04)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Monday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2020-05-04 15:00 UTC' Links to all issues to be

Re: OCaml packages in Rawhide are broken for long time

On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 4:46 PM Jerry James wrote: > > On Sun, May 3, 2020 at 1:47 AM Igor Gnatenko > wrote: > > Is anybody planning to fix bunch of FTI (Fails To Install) ocaml > > packages in rawhide? > > Richard tried an update to an OCaml 4.11 prerelease last week to > address some RISC-V prob

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2020-05-04)

= #fedora-meeting-1: FESCO (2020-05-04) = Meeting started by decathorpe at 15:02:52 UTC. The full logs are available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2020-05-04/fesco.2020-05-04-15.02.log.html . Meetin

Re: New set of questions for FESCo candidates?

On Sat, Apr 4, 2020 at 3:49 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 04. 11. 19 15:58, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > Dear all, > > > > the semiannual exercise is upon us. FESCo candidates must submit an > > "interview" in which they answer a set of questions (but can also add > > whatever they want

Re: will disappear from rawhide glibc soon

On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 5:50 PM Florian Weimer wrote: > > This follows the removal of the system call from Linux 5.5. Having the > header and function just confuses configure checks that assume that if > the function is present, it will do something useful (it never did on > aarch64, and it's bee

Stewardship SIG Orphaned Nine Java Packages

Hi everybody, The Stewardship SIG has started to drop some old and unused functionality in some of our packages, which made it possible to drop some ancient cruft (some of those packages have not been touched upstream for over 15 years). So, we have orphaned the following packages, since we no lo

Re: will disappear from rawhide glibc soon

On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 6:01 PM Florian Weimer wrote: > > * Fabio Valentini: > > > On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 5:50 PM Florian Weimer wrote: > >> > >> This follows the removal of the system call from Linux 5.5. Having the > >> header and function just con

Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?

On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 5:06 PM Tomas Tomecek wrote: Hi Tomas, I'll respond below with some of my experiences and opinions ... > Let’s talk about dist-git, as a place where we work. For us, > packagers, it’s a well-known place. Yet for newcomers, it may take a > while to learn all the details. E

Re: CPE Weekly: 2020-04-26

On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 4:08 PM Leigh Griffin wrote: > > > > On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 10:55 AM Guido Aulisi wrote: >> >> Il giorno dom, 26/04/2020 alle 18.13 +0100, Aoife Moloney ha scritto: >> > # CPE Weekly: 2020-04-26 >> > --- >> > title: CPE Weekly status email >> > tags: CPE Weekly, email >> >

Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?

On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 10:37 AM Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > Dne 05. 05. 20 v 18:37 Fabio Valentini napsal(a): > > On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 5:06 PM Tomas Tomecek wrote: > > > > Hi Tomas, > > > > I'll respond below with some of my experiences and opinions

Re: Call for help: maven-verifier-plugin FTBFS with Java11

On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 6:39 PM Jerry James wrote: > > On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 10:26 AM Jerry James wrote: > > For the latter error, see > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MJAVADOC-615, which claims that > > "the JDK issue has been resolved" without specifying how it was > > resolved. > > Th

Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?

On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 9:55 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 03:12:15PM -0400, David Cantrell wrote: > > WHAT I WANT TO BE ABLE TO DO: > > > > * View Fedora's dist-git repos as authoritative for packages built for > > Fedora. That is, I want to see a package on

Re: Call for help: maven-verifier-plugin FTBFS with Java11

On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 10:19 PM Jerry James wrote: > > On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 10:43 AM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > I pushed maven-javadoc-plugin-3.2.0 to rawhide today, which should fix > > OpenJDK 11 related issues according to its release notes. > > Please verify th

Orphaned felix-framework, felix-osgi-obr-resolver

Hi everybody, I have just orphaned both felix-framework and felix-osgi-obr-resolver, since none of the packages maintained by the Stewardship SIG depend on them any longer. We transitioned onto OSGi 7.0.0 / osgi-core where possible, and other users of those APIs should probably do that too. Fabio

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >