On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 8:50 PM Jan Kratochvil
<jan.kratoch...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 25 Jun 2020 19:18:59 +0200, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > In contrast, Nano offers the kind of graphical text editing experience
> > that people are used to,
>
> This is another step trying to make Fedora end-user friendly while the only
> effect is making it hostile to developers. As Fedora will never be used by
> end-users as it conflicts with Fedora's foundation Freedom. With each such
> step it takes more and more effort to make a new Fedora installation usable by
> a developer (setenforce 0, dnf remove bash-completion, remove rhgb quiet 
> etc.).

I must be a very weird (fedora) developer. I have never done any of
those three things :)

FWIW, I embrace the "EDITOR=nano by default" change so hard that I
need to be careful not to squeeze too hard.

Setting nano as default editor (or installing it on Server Edition) is
the first thing I do on every fresh fedora install. Still, every time
vi(m) opens for some reason, I feel like being thrown into cold water
(or into an exam situation, unprepared) - I still don't know any vi
commands other than :q, :q!, and :wq after more than a decade of using
as my primary OS.

Once a FESCo ticket exists for this Change, it'll have my +1 vote.
Fabio
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to