On Sun, Jun 28, 2020 at 7:54 PM Gerald B. Cox <gb...@bzb.us> wrote:
> And?  I don't know about you, when dealing with file systems a chart with OK, 
> Mostly OK and Unstable doesn't give me the warm and fuzzies.  Especially when 
> OK is defined as:  "should be safe to use, no known major defficiencies" .  
> "Should" raises a red flag with me, especially given the history of BTRFS.  
> Again, if we're going to be making something the DEFAULT, it should have at 
> least 1 production release.  Where is it?  I haven't been able to find one 
> and I've asked multiple people and the response has always ducked the issue 
> or been crickets.

I'm wondering, how do you actually want to define a "production
release" of a kernel module?
Does being part of an upstream kernel release (not in staging modules)
not qualify?
Because that's already the case, and has been for years. The
introduction of the btrfs module even predates all six currently
maintained LTS branches.

Fabio
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to