I tried to do an install and an update on two different terminals on my
machine yesterday. The second one didn't yell about an rpmdb lock but it
did say that it was waiting on a process. So unless it broke from an update
last night / this morning then idk
On Jul 16, 2015 11:20 AM, "Richard Shaw" w
> *No one else* suggested discarding /sbin. Doing so
> will break decades of stable open source and free software.
Didn't Arch move /usr/sbin to just be a symlink to /usr/bin?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of
On Aug 16, 2015 2:59 PM, "Reindl Harald" wrote:
>
>
> Am 16.08.2015 um 20:52 schrieb Eric Griffith:
>>
>> > *No one else* suggested discarding /sbin. Doing so
>> > will break decades of stable open source and free software.
>>
>> Didn
Rawhide rebrand:
Something akin to openSUSE's "Tumbleweed" name.
Maybe reuse the "Fedora.Next" name? Something that implies its rolling
release / pre-release. Fedora Testing? For some reason "Fedora Tophat" just
popped into my head as a pun on hats and being "ontop" of updates.
On Aug 19, 2015 1:
der the "Fedora Next"
umbrella.
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 6:56 PM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 01:18:42PM -0400, Eric Griffith wrote:
> > Something akin to openSUSE's "Tumbleweed" name.
> > Maybe reuse the "Fedora.Next" name? Someth
Come to think of it, wasn't there an initiative a few years ago to make
Rawhide more stable called "Fedora CUT" ? Continuously Usable Testing or
something similar
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 7:09 PM, Ben Cotton
wrote:
> I thought the "Fedora Tophat" suggestion was pretty awesome. I also
> think the
Google informs me that was for Debian, nevermind! >.>
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 7:11 PM, Eric Griffith
wrote:
> Come to think of it, wasn't there an initiative a few years ago to make
> Rawhide more stable called "Fedora CUT" ? Continuously Usable Testing or
> someth
back.
The problems may have been fixed but the name remained and therefore the
history remained.
On Aug 20, 2015 8:33 AM, "Jonathan Wakely" wrote:
> On 19/08/15 13:18 -0400, Eric Griffith wrote:
>
>> Rawhide rebrand:
>>
>> Something akin to openSUSE's "Tumb
On Aug 20, 2015 9:04 AM, "Jonathan Wakely" wrote:
>
> On 20/08/15 08:40 -0400, Eric Griffith wrote:
>>
>> I won't say its impossible but its -very- hard to remove the bad
>> connotations and bad history from a name without changing the name of the
>>
On Sep 2, 2015 8:46 PM, "Adam Williamson"
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2015-09-01 at 11:00 +0200, Germano Massullo wrote:
> > Il 31/08/2015 18:19, Adam Williamson ha scritto:
> > > There isn't really a great alternative to ownCloud (that I know
> > > of) if
> > > you actually *want* a 'personal cloud server
That's a shame. I run an owncloud instance for the family right now, I
guess I'll be swapping it out for an upstream package. Is there anything
you're aware of that I should watch for during the migration?
On Sep 2, 2015 22:37, "Adam Williamson" wrote:
> On Wed, 201
On Sep 11, 2015 9:03 AM, "Zdenek Kabelac" wrote:
>
> Dne 11.9.2015 v 14:46 Germano Massullo napsal(a):
>
> Fault #1
> (I've already complained that usage of rawhide & rpmfusion is getting
silly)
>
>
How is the usage getting silly? *genuinely confused* Id love for Fedora to
have everything in the r
On Sep 11, 2015 9:27 AM, "Zdenek Kabelac" wrote:
>
> Dne 11.9.2015 v 15:22 Eric Griffith napsal(a):
>>
>>
>> On Sep 11, 2015 9:03 AM, "Zdenek Kabelac" > <mailto:zkabe...@redhat.com>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Dne 11.9.2015 v
Suggested way to upgrade from 22 to 23? Fresh install? Fedup? Change
release ver for dnf? Did the new dnf upgrade tool get packaged?
On Sep 22, 2015 11:49 AM, "Vít Ondruch" wrote:
> Dne 22.9.2015 v 17:30 Richard Hughes napsal(a):
> > On 22 September 2015 at 16:16, Neal Gompa wrote:
> >> Looks l
On Sep 23, 2015 13:48, "Andreas Tunek" wrote:
>
> 2015-09-23 0:16 GMT+02:00 Adam Williamson :
> > On Tue, 2015-09-22 at 13:33 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> >> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 06:21:00PM +0100, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> >> > I just used dnf distro-sync as per:
> >> > https://fedoraproject.org
Is anyone else noticing dnf being really slow? Like taking 5mins+ to do a
simple metadata search
On Sep 23, 2015 15:51, "Pádraig Brady" wrote:
> On 23/09/15 18:19, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 12:13:39PM -0400, Eric Griffith wrote:
> >> Sugg
On Sep 23, 2015 10:37 PM, "Adam Williamson"
wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2015-09-23 at 15:42 -0400, Eric Griffith wrote:
> > Also is "--distro-sync --best" advised or not? The wiki only listed
> > the
> > first part of that command, not those two additional
On mine laptop the "Settings" are 0%-100%-(unspecified)%, I'm not sure why
you're getting a really long number. Using a non-english locale maybe? Bug
in drivers / pulse?
On Sep 27, 2015 10:53, "kendell clark" wrote:
> hi
> Ah, this makes a lotmore sense. If I had to suggest a change, I'd
> recomm
Gnome Software definitely needs some love on the performance side of
things. Installing applications is fine but updates always seem to take
two-three times as long to display available updates vs me running "dnf
update" and getting a package list back. Not sure if dnf is just that much
faster or i
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 12:06 PM, Richard Hughes
wrote:
> On 29 September 2015 at 14:50, Eric Griffith
> wrote:
> > Installing applications is fine but updates always seem to take two-three
> > times as long to display available updates vs me running "dnf update" an
On Sep 29, 2015 1:32 PM, "Richard Hughes" wrote:
>
> On 29 September 2015 at 18:08, Eric Griffith
wrote:
> > That seems like a really bad idea..
>
> The alternative is we have a "download" stage, which means we can't do
> the blue "restar
On Sep 30, 2015 12:22 AM, "Ben Boeckel" wrote:
>
> On Tue, 29 Sep, 2015 at 17:08:17 GMT, Eric Griffith wrote:
> > update system-- yum never downloaded the packages as part of the check,
DNF
> > doesn't, App Store / Play Store don't download as part
Hey all, hate to be a downer but we might have a bug in the installer
Just installed F23 Workstation via RC10. Encryption with btrfs across two
drives. Intel graphics (Lenovo t450s if anyone has access to one).
Installed the system, rebooted into system. I get met with a black screen
and the text
Grub2-mkconfig works fine on F23. Maybe not for complex operations but for
general modifications to /etc/default/grub it creates a perfectly working
grub.cfg
On Dec 18, 2015 14:31, "Andrew Lutomirski" wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 5:05 AM, Reindl Harald
> wrote:
> >
> > besides that the wiki
rted-- especially given the
emphasis the Fedora places upon staying as close to upstream as possible.
On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 5:07 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 1:01 PM, Eric Griffith
> wrote:
> > Grub2-mkconfig works fine on F23. Maybe not for complex operations
On Dec 28, 2015 18:02, "Bojan Smojver" wrote:
>
> Reindl Harald thelounge.net> writes:
>
> > what do you try to tell us with that question?
>
> I'm trying to establish whether Fedora needs a 43.0.2 (or better) build of
> FF in order to close this security hole.
>
Is there any reason Fedora would
On Jan 12, 2016 15:03, "Josh Boyer" wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 2:08 PM, Mattia Verga
wrote:
> > Il 07/01/2016 20:30, Tomasz Torcz ha scritto:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 01:33:22PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> The 4.3.3 kernel has been pushed to updates-te
On Jan 22, 2016 14:08, "Adam Williamson" wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2016-01-22 at 18:32 +, mastaiza wrote:
> > Hi
> > wanted to know why doesn't work command install @hawaii
>
> it's a magical place...
> --
That's Tahiti :P
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproje
On Jan 22, 2016 15:04, "Adam Williamson" wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2016-01-22 at 14:45 -0500, Eric Griffith wrote:
> > On Jan 22, 2016 14:08, "Adam Williamson"
wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, 2016-01-22 at 18:32 +, mastaiza wrote:
> > > &
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 3:20 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
>
> Lennart Poettering writes:
> > Again, as mentioned before: key here is that permitting user processes
> > to stick around after all sessions of the user ended needs to be a
> > privilieged concept. It should not be allowed for user code to s
On May 31, 2016 15:44, "Adam Williamson" wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2016-05-31 at 15:26 -0400, Eric Griffith wrote:
> > What if the Anaconda team changed it so the "Make this user an
> > administrator" checkbox also enabled linger?
>
> anaconda team is (rightly
I'm testing it out for Phoronix. The copr works correctly, it installs
fine. Running snapper works fine, once you figure out what the correct
instructions should be (snapcraft.io's instructions are slightly wrong).
Applications appear to run correctly and integrate fine in the Workstation
environm
On Jun 18, 2016 16:30, "Kevin Fenzi" wrote:
>
> On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 14:14:29 -0300
> "Gerald B. Cox" wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 12:18 PM, Jiri Eischmann
> > wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > KDE has been interested in Flatpak for over a year. They even have a
> > > KDE runtime and a couple of KDE
Special kudos to marketing, releng, and QA! But truly, thank you to
everyone involved in making this an awesome release!
On Jun 21, 2016 11:40, "Luya Tshimbalanga" wrote:
> On 21/06/16 07:35 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > Fedora 24 is a wonderful release. Thanks to everyone for all of your
> > har
Can anyone answer this relatively simple question: "Why grubby?" I've seen a
number of discussions on various topics surrounding the boot loader that all
seem to devolve into "We would love to support that, but grubby doesn't, so we
can't."
At what point does the maintenance burden of using gr
possibility for a
distro like Fedora. I know Arch has it as an install time option, but I don't
know it's limitations.
Cheers!
Eric
> On Oct 6, 2016, at 21:20, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 3:17 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> On Thu, 6 Oct 2016 17:05:4
My own two cents in this whole thing, after reading this entire thread...
Matt's right.
This isn't a call to action because the release is a week away and there's
critical 32-but bugs that need fixed. This isn't a call for support because
there's specific bugs that need fixed.
This is a call
I don't have a Fedora system in front of me, but on new installs isn't /bin
a symlink to /usr/bin already? Functionally, whats the effect of this
change? Pardon the confusion.
On Feb 10, 2016 00:56, "Petr Stodulka" wrote:
> I apologize if this mail is here twice, I can't find previous mail.
> ---
The kernel, presumably. I was confused as well, but if you look at the sent
line, you'll see that this got sent to -devel and -kernel.
On Feb 19, 2016 01:40, "Garrett Holmstrom" wrote:
> On 2016-02-18 17:51, Laura Abbott wrote:
>
>> 4.4.2 is currently building and should be in updates-testing soo
Question!
Are Alpha images signed to work with Secure Boot? There's a bug Id like to
test out once I'm home, but both of my computer's get angry if I turn off
Secure Boot / the images aren't signed.
As a side point: does anyone know if Grub got fixed so that it no longer
crashes / segfaults if it
On Mar 29, 2016 11:25, "Kevin Fenzi" wrote:
>
> On Tue, 29 Mar 2016 11:07:56 -0400
> Eric Griffith wrote:
>
> > Question!
> >
> > Are Alpha images signed to work with Secure Boot? There's a bug Id
> > like to test out once I'm home, but
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 1:08 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Mar 2016 11:40:05 -0400
> Eric Griffith wrote:
>
> >
> > There was, once upon a time, but I'm having trouble tracking it down.
> >
> > What's more interesting is.. I've got a system
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Michael Catanzaro
wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-04-04 at 14:19 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> > That seems to be a bit over-dramatic. gnome-initial-setup works fine.
> > The online accounts step will be affected, but that's about it.
>
> And the breakage will be limited t
Bug in question: http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?46707
Steps to reproduce:
1) Be on UEFI Machine, have secure boot enabled.
2) Install any unsigned kernel-- rawhide-nodebug works fine for this IF you
are on RC2 or RC3. RC1 was signed.
3) Boot the machine. Select unsigned kernel from grub menu.
Thi
Thanks for sending this reminder out, Peter, I meant to do this but
completely forgot. Will reply with info from a Thinkpad T450s tomorrow.
On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 10:20 PM, Peter Hutterer
wrote:
> [Disclaimer: sorry if you've seen this one before, I posted it to desktop@
> but I only got one re
> On Sep 15, 2017, at 12:08, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 2017-09-15 at 18:03 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>> * Why are there the minimize/maximize buttons? They should not be
>> there in Gnome.
>
> I filed this one this morning:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1491981
>
As
46 matches
Mail list logo
