On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 1:08 PM, Kevin Fenzi <ke...@scrye.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Mar 2016 11:40:05 -0400 > Eric Griffith <egriffit...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > There was, once upon a time, but I'm having trouble tracking it down. > > > > What's more interesting is.. I've got a system in front of me, and I > > just installed rawhide-nodebug on it. Recreated Grub, rebooted, > > picked that entry from the boot menu.. And it booted. Secure boot is > > enabled, those kernels aren't signed (according to the wiki), > > shouldn't Grub be screaming its head off about the kernel not being > > signed? > > No, but your firmware shouldn't allow it to boot. I'd double check that > secure boot is enabled and that you are really booting a kernel from > rawhide-nodebug repo. uname -r says 4.6.0-0.rc1.git0.1.fc25.x86_64 dnf info kernel: Name : kernel Arch : x86_64 Epoch : 0 Version : 4.6.0 Release : 0.rc1.git0.1.fc25 Size : 0.0 Repo : @System >From repo : fedora-rawhide-kernel-nodebug Summary : The Linux kernel URL : http://www.kernel.org/ License : GPLv2 and Redistributable, no modification permitted Description : The kernel meta package Asus UEFI says Secure Boot: Enabled. I'll play around with the firmware and see if I can't get it to fail to boot. Really bizarre.
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
