the best way to set up
> a PHP site now".
>
> Yep, migration needs work. Acknowledged. The same could be said of
> changing an init system, changing a default syslog implementation,
> changing the way a database server is configured, changing the defaults
> for a proxy server's
I just orphaned the python-mitogen package. I packaged it for my last
job but I no longer use it and I'm not interested in maintaining it
anymore. As best I can tell, nothing else in the distribution
requires or build requires it. It's up for grabs if anyone is
interested.
--
C
/show_bug.cgi?id=1339379
Carl George
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833855
--
Carl George
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/co
ailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
--
Carl George
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedo
a modular libgit2 help me
understand. Given the current issues, this seems like a reasonable solution.
If other agree, I'm happy to submit these compat packages for review.
Carl George
Rackspace
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedor
> So what is the point of modules then? If we want just multiple
> versions of a few applications, we can just have few repositories.
Add another repository for every alternate version (stream) doesn't scale.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedorap
> Or you think changing huge pieces of infrastructure, and working for
> 3+ years on a project (modularity) was done just to have 3 versions of
> Node.js available?
Of course not. Modularity is a great fit to provide multiple versions many
applications (in one repository), such as php, mariadb,
o keep the package around.
[0] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176050
[1]
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-deepmap-oapi-codegen/c/2792c7c77ff7815f82a942a944ccf48f0401c0a1?branch=rawhide
--
Carl George
___
devel mailing lis
her name we come up with) when I create the #change-proposal tag.
>
> Moving the packaging list is a Packaging Committee decision.
>
> Automated posts can be moved at any time. I can work with the people
> who own the generation of those reports to figure out a good a
g
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
&
o unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@
raproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-i
they don't have
permission to commit to or request branches for? This is a regular
issue for new EPEL major versions, where a maintainer doesn't have
access to request new EPEL branches for all their dependencies.
--
Carl George
--
___
epel-
t; Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
--
Carl George
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https
ild the
new sqlcipher in a side tag and then complete the rebuilds in the side
tag myself via proven packager permissions.
[0] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120882
[1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/sqlcipher/pull-request/3
[2] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jo
On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 3:59 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2022, 21:20 Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
>>
>> On 8/26/22 06:12, Fabio Valentini wrote:
>> > On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 3:12 AM Carl George wrote:
>> >>
>> >> sqlcipher has be
with the exception flag because it would fall under the second bullet
point for exceptions.
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/ReviewGuidelines/#_package_review_process
If the package is intended to be EPEL-only, make sure to retire the
rawhide branch.
--
Carl George
___
aproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
--
Carl George
--
__
ect/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
--
Ca
ng_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
--
Carl George
___
d
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
> ht
I've just orphaned python-pdir2 as I no longer use it. Feel free to
take ownership if you like. Fair warning, it's failing to build for
Python 3.11 in rawhide, and updating to the latest version will
require packaging pdm-pep517.
--
C
://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mumble/c/490fc25a45b4816b73ac2ff5c0954668ae4b723a?branch=master
--
Carl George
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https
link_or_comment
[4] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/carlwgeorge/mumble-wayland/
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 6:57 PM Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 3:30 PM Carl George wrote:
>>
>> Howdy folks,
>>
>> This is a non-responsive maintainer check for fedpop
2020 at 2:54 PM Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 2:42 PM Carl George wrote:
>>
>> Yes, the patch is from an upstream pull request [0] that has already
>> been merged to the master branch [1] and is planned to be included in
>> their next release [2] (
tched in F31 as well - so since
> this update fixes it, the update would be suitable for F31.
>
> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849735
>
> -Ian
>
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 5:01 PM Carl George wrote:
>>
>> F32 is fine by me. Based on the updates polic
Pull request has been rebased and is ready to be merged. Thanks for
your help with this Richard.
On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 6:59 PM Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 4:34 PM Carl George wrote:
>>
>> I read the policy [0] as "major (bug | security) fixes&q
fers all the architectures that
EPEL does. As far as I can tell, the three most popular (Alma, Rocky,
Oracle) only offer x86_64 and aarch64 but are missing ppc64le and
s390x. That said CentOS Linux 8 doesn't offer s390x either, so we
already have this problem, but switch the
astructure
Agreed, for quick local builds it's fine to use epel8-next (c8s) to
verify it builds and then submit the koji build to the epel8 (rhel8)
target. If the local build works but the koji build doesn't, you
likely have a candidate for an official epel8-next koji build.
--
Carl George
would also send an email to epel-devel
beforehand to avoid a quick retire/unretire churn for the packages
other maintainers are interested in keeping around.
--
Carl George
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubs
perhaps epel-announce) first.
Alternatively, have you considered doing an incompatible update [1] to
version 5? It may already be EOL, but surely that's a better option
than the current version 3 or removing it entirely.
[0]
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maint
sts.fedoraproject.org
>> Do not reply to spam, report it:
>> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>
> --
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.f
(e.g. %pyproject_check_import) MUST be run. This ensures
that missing run-time dependencies fail the build. If you get a FTI
bug for one of your Python packages, it likely means this policy isn't
being followed.
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/#_tests
--
Carl G
On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 11:01 AM Stephen Smoogen wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, 25 Sept 2024 at 11:53, Carl George wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 6:25 AM Zdeněk Žamberský wrote:
>>
>> To reiterate from the existing issue, EPEL 10 hasn't launched yet
st Archives:
> >
> > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Do not reply to spam, report it:
> > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Stephen Smoogen, Red
send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
&
s.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://li
d things
> out with Michel and his packaging yet? "
>
> which I ask here , had I to sort out anything with anyone ?
>
> but anyway I replied to Michel showing that way of set flags is not
> right and his package is incomplete etc etc
>
> 2025-05-07 00:58
wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
--
Carl George
--
___
devel ma
oraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
--
Carl George
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an ema
send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/
oject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > List Archives:
> > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Do not reply to spam, report it:
> > https://pagur
On Tue, Aug 5, 2025 at 7:01 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 5, 2025 at 7:11 PM Carl George wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 5, 2025 at 12:01 PM Stephen Gallagher
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Aug 5, 2025 at 11:10 AM Jan Stanek wrote:
>
44 matches
Mail list logo
