Re: Remove openh264?

There are already several bug reports in different places: https://pagure.io/fedora-workstation/issue/409 https://github.com/rpm-software-management/libdnf/issues/1649 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2274169 (CLOSED UPSTREAM) -- ___ devel

Re: Remove openh264?

On Wed, May 28 2025 at 04:51:33 PM -05:00:00, Chris Adams wrote: This package is for playing one particular encoding of videos (and only certain profiles of that encoding from what I understand). There's also nothing preventing Fedora from pointing users to Cisco's site to get their provide

Re: Remove openh264?

Once upon a time, Demi M. Obenour said: > Could video files be made to open in a browser by default? That changes nothing. The problem is openh264 provides the decoder for H.264 encoded files - any software in Fedora (not counting RPM Fusion or Google Chrome, just Fedora-provided) that wants to

Re: Remove openh264?

Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Leigh Scott leigh123li...@gmail.com said: > > openh264 can't play video either. Sorry for my ignorance. openh264 can decode, x264 hasn't got decode. > > Wrong > > I asked Claude to list the differences. > > Ask stupid AI questions, get stupid answers. As

Re: Remove openh264?

Chris Adams venit, vidit, dixit 2025-05-29 21:27:08: > Once upon a time, Michael J Gruber said: > > Chris Adams venit, vidit, dixit 2025-05-29 20:42:29: > > > Once upon a time, Chuck Anderson said: > > > > On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 08:18:08PM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel > > > > wrote: > > > >

Re: Remove openh264?

Once upon a time, Michael J Gruber said: > That worked, thanks! It swapped out gstreamer1-plugin-openh264, too. > Now, which 264 is that one? That's the plugin for the gstreamer framework to use the openh264 library, so it's fine for it to get removed too (it won't do anything with noopenh264 ins

Re: HEADS UP: Updating opencascade to 7.9.1 in Rawhide

On 5/29/25 02:25 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: I somehow lost track of what I had built and built a couple of packages twice but all builds sans smesh are built and submitted for update: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-6847871fab

ELN SIG meeting minutes for 29 May '25

* [Text Log](https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2025-05-29/eln.2025-05-29-19.00.log.txt) * [HTML Log](https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2025-05-29/eln.2025-05-29-19.00.log.html) * [Text Minutes](https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/me

Re: Remove openh264?

On Thu, May 29 2025 at 05:30:52 PM -00:00:00, Leigh Scott wrote: How? open264 /path/to/file.mkv ? Open the file using any application that uses GStreamer or ffmpeg, so basically any video player or web browser. It notably makes most videos work in Firefox, Totem (F42 default video player),

Re: Remove openh264?

Once upon a time, Michael Catanzaro said: > OK, but in practice, it enables playback of almost all the videos > that users actually care about. With openh264 installed, you can > watch most videos in your web browser, download them, and play them > locally in Totem or Showtime. Otherwise, you cann

Re: Slowness of installing *-selinux subpackages

> Neal Gompa writes: > The problem is that policy modules can depend on each other, and since > policy modules can add things both to the global store and to the pool > of stuff other modules can use, it has to be processed serially. Even then, semodule itself takes a surprising amount of ti

Re: Remove openh264?

Vitaly Zaitsev wrote: > On 29/05/2025 16:52, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > If the user has RPM Fusion enabled, then openh264 is not necessary or > > desirable. RPM Fusion has better video decoders available. If you have > > figured out how to install video decoders from RPM Fusion, then > > disab

Re: Remove openh264?

Chris Adams venit, vidit, dixit 2025-05-29 20:42:29: > Once upon a time, Chuck Anderson said: > > On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 08:18:08PM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > > - installed package ffmpeg-libs-7.1.1-6.fc41.x86_64 requires > > > libopenh264.so.7()(64bit), but none of the providers

Re: Remove openh264?

Swap to noopenh264 instead: I believe the correct way to do this is to first disable the repo, then swap the packages: - sudo dnf config-manager setopt fedora-cisco-openh264.enabled=0 - sudo dnf swap '*openh264*' noopenh264 mozilla-openh264 (from the cisco repo) can't be removed because firef

Re: Remove openh264?

Once upon a time, Michael J Gruber said: > Chris Adams venit, vidit, dixit 2025-05-29 20:42:29: > > Once upon a time, Chuck Anderson said: > > > On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 08:18:08PM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > > > - installed package ffmpeg-libs-7.1.1-6.fc41.x86_64 requires > > > >

Re: Remove openh264?

Once upon a time, pgnd said: > dnf config-manager setopt fedora-cisco-openh264.enabled=0 > dnf swap '*openh264*' noopenh264 > Updating and loading repositories: > Repositories loaded. > Failed to resolve the transaction: > Problem: cannot install the best candidate for the job > - conf

Re: Remove openh264?

Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Wed, May 28 2025 at 04:51:33 PM -05:00:00, Chris Adams > li...@cmadams.net wrote: > > This package is for playing one particular encoding of videos (and > > only > > certain profiles of that encoding from what I understand). There's > > also > > nothing preventing

Re: Remove openh264?

Leigh Scott venit, vidit, dixit 2025-05-29 16:59:11: > Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > On Wed, May 28 2025 at 04:51:33 PM -05:00:00, Chris Adams > > li...@cmadams.net wrote: > > > This package is for playing one particular encoding of videos (and > > > only > > > certain profiles of that encoding fr

Re: Remove openh264?

Neal Gompa wrote: > On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 10:59 AM Leigh Scott leigh123li...@gmail.com wrote: > > Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > On Wed, May 28 2025 at 04:51:33 PM -05:00:00, Chris Adams > > li...@cmadams.net wrote: > > This package is for playing one particular encoding of videos (and > > only > >

Re: Remove openh264?

Once upon a time, Leigh Scott said: > openh264 can't play video either. Wrong > I asked Claude to list the differences. Ask stupid AI questions, get stupid answers. -- Chris Adams -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubs

Re: Remove openh264?

here, addition of `--no-best` is sufficient dnf config-manager setopt fedora-cisco-openh264.enabled=0 dnf swap '*openh264*' noopenh264 --no-best with that, the install's good, removing gstreamer1-plugin-openh264 mozilla-openh264 openh264 and installing noopenh264 restarting FF 13

Re: Fedora Council statement on Proven Packager situation

On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 08:22:45PM +0200, Emmanuel Seyman wrote: > * Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek [28/05/2025 15:24] : > > > > No, I don't think we'll make the issue public. Among other reasons, > > there is a lot of discussion about personal matters. Making it publicly > > visible would go against

Remove openh264?

On 29/05/2025 16:19, Michael J Gruber wrote: Leigh Scott venit, vidit, dixit 2025-05-29 16:59:11: x264 is superior for playback, openh264 only advantages are it's free and has better webrtc performance. Most users would be better served using gstreamer1-plugins-ugly and ffmpeg-libs from rpmf

Re: Remove openh264?

On Thu, 2025-05-29 at 16:29 -0400, pgnd wrote: > here, addition of `--no-best` is sufficient > >dnf config-manager setopt fedora-cisco-openh264.enabled=0 >dnf swap '*openh264*' noopenh264 --no-best > > with that, the install's good, removing > >gstreamer1-plugin-openh264 >mozilla

Re: Remove openh264?

I've done this, but as soon as I do a simple "dnf update" it tries to replace noopenh264 with openh264 again ... from "fedora-multimedia" ... hmmm i don't use/install `fedora-multimedia` here. i have what i need from rpmfusion*. iirc (?) they _can_ coexist ... try changing your repo priori

Re: Remove openh264?

Once upon a time, Simo Sorce said: > On Thu, 2025-05-29 at 16:29 -0400, pgnd wrote: > > here, addition of `--no-best` is sufficient > > > >dnf config-manager setopt fedora-cisco-openh264.enabled=0 > >dnf swap '*openh264*' noopenh264 --no-best > > > > with that, the install's good, removi

Re: Remove openh264?

I just had the same result, but this worked for me: sudo dnf download noopenh264.x86_64 sudo dnf install noopenh264-2.5.0-2.fc42.x86_64.rpm --allowerasing Trying to install from the repo without downloading gave similar results to sudo dnf swap. On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 5:55 AM Jonathan Schleifer

Re: Remove openh264?

Once upon a time, Chuck Anderson said: > On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 08:18:08PM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > - installed package ffmpeg-libs-7.1.1-6.fc41.x86_64 requires > > libopenh264.so.7()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > > Swap to noopenh264 instead: I believe

Re: Remove openh264?

On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 1:51 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 7:28 AM Alexander Sosedkin > wrote: > > > > On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 12:34 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 5:42 AM Alexander Sosedkin > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 12:1

Re: Remove openh264?

V Thu, May 29, 2025 at 08:23:37AM -0400, Jason Montleon napsal(a): > I just had the same result, but this worked for me: > > sudo dnf download noopenh264.x86_64 > sudo dnf install noopenh264-2.5.0-2.fc42.x86_64.rpm --allowerasing > > Trying to install from the repo without downloading gave simila

Re: Remove openh264?

If the user has RPM Fusion enabled, then openh264 is not necessary or desirable. RPM Fusion has better video decoders available. If you have figured out how to install video decoders from RPM Fusion, then disabling the Cisco repo would make sense. --

Re: HEADS UP: Updating opencascade to 7.9.1 in Rawhide

I somehow lost track of what I had built and built a couple of packages twice but all builds sans smesh are built and submitted for update: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-6847871fab Thanks, Richard -- ___ devel mailing list -- deve

Re: Remove openh264?

On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 08:18:08PM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > On 29/05/2025 16:52, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > If the user has RPM Fusion enabled, then openh264 is not necessary or > > desirable. RPM Fusion has better video decoders available. If you have > > figured out how to ins

Re: Remove openh264?

Once upon a time, Jonathan Schleifer said: > Am 29.04.25 um 19:21 schrieb Leigh Scott: > >sudo dnf swap *\openh264\* noopenh264 --allowerasing > > Unfortunately that does not seem to work on f42: Hmm, it works for me on Fedora 41. Maybe try disabling the Cisco repo first? sudo dnf config-ma

Fedora eln compose report: 20250529.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-eln-20250528.n.0 NEW: Fedora-eln-20250529.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 45 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of

Re: PWG+OpenPrinting annual joint meetup May 2025

> Zdenek Dohnal writes: > I'm glad at least someone reads them :D For the record, I read them intently as my entire department's printing infrastructure (supporting windows, macos and Linux machines) runs through print servers running Fedora. It's a great help to have a summary of what's go

Re: Remove openh264?

On Wed, May 28 2025 at 06:18:41 PM -04:00:00, Neal Gompa wrote: Honestly, we don't really push for security like that. We have generally provided optionality, but that doesn't mean we want security to outweigh our community and usability. The crypto policies is an example of the problems caus

Re: Remove openh264?

On 5/29/25 10:21 AM, Chris Adams wrote: The bulk of my online video watching is Youtube, which AFAIK prefers VP9. I don't know about other video sites. YouTube mixes AV1, h264, and VP9. Other sites are mostly h264. There are a few outliers like Netflix. They provide some streams with AV1 and

Re: Remove openh264?

Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Leigh Scott leigh123li...@gmail.com said: > > openh264 can't play video either. > > Wrong How? open264 /path/to/file.mkv ? > > I asked Claude to list the differences. > > Ask stupid AI questions, get stupid answers. -- _

Re: Slowness of installing *-selinux subpackages

Neal Gompa writes: > On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 6:16 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >> >> [This is a general moan / observation ... Sorry!] >> >> SELinux policy is sometimes now split so that packages can carry their >> own policy subpackage. Examples include: >> >> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpm

Re: Remove openh264?

Can Fedora tell users to get software that needs codecs as flatpaks from Flathub? -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedora

Re: Remove openh264?

Could video files be made to open in a browser by default? -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/projec

Re: Remove openh264?

On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 10:59 AM Leigh Scott wrote: > > Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > On Wed, May 28 2025 at 04:51:33 PM -05:00:00, Chris Adams > > li...@cmadams.net wrote: > > > This package is for playing one particular encoding of videos (and > > > only > > > certain profiles of that encoding fr

Re: Remove openh264?

On 29/05/2025 16:52, Michael Catanzaro wrote: If the user has RPM Fusion enabled, then openh264 is not necessary or desirable. RPM Fusion has better video decoders available. If you have figured out how to install video decoders from RPM Fusion, then disabling the Cisco repo would make sense.

Re: Slowness of installing *-selinux subpackages

On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 07:35:28PM +0200, Petr Lautrbach wrote: > Neal Gompa writes: > > > On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 6:16 AM Richard W.M. Jones > > wrote: > >> > >> [This is a general moan / observation ... Sorry!] > >> > >> SELinux policy is sometimes now split so that packages can carry their >

Slowness of installing *-selinux subpackages

[This is a general moan / observation ... Sorry!] SELinux policy is sometimes now split so that packages can carry their own policy subpackage. Examples include: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/passt/blob/rawhide/f/passt.spec#_36 https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/nbdkit/blob/rawhide/f/nbdkit

Re: Remove openh264?

On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 5:42 AM Alexander Sosedkin wrote: > > On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 12:19 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 5:52 PM Chris Adams wrote: > > > > > > Once upon a time, Michael Catanzaro said: > > > > On Wed, May 28 2025 at 03:19:49 PM -05:00:00, Chris Adams > >

Re: Remove openh264?

On Thu, 29 May 2025 at 06:04, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Thu, 29 May 2025 at 10:54, Jonathan Schleifer wrote: > > > > Thanks for bringing this to my attention - I had no idea Fedora would > > let something so serious be unfixed for so long, as I kinda assumed > > Fedora is on top of security upd

Re: PWG+OpenPrinting annual joint meetup May 2025

Hi Dominik! Thank you! I'm glad at least someone reads them :D Zdenek On 5/23/25 11:03, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski via devel wrote: Hi, Zdenek! On Monday, 19 May 2025 at 10:43, Zdenek Dohnal wrote: Hi all, I attended annual PWG (Printer Working Group) and OpenPrinting meetup which was

Re: Remove openh264?

On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 7:28 AM Alexander Sosedkin wrote: > > On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 12:34 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 5:42 AM Alexander Sosedkin > > wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 12:19 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > > > > > On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 5:52 PM

Re: Slowness of installing *-selinux subpackages

On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 6:16 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > [This is a general moan / observation ... Sorry!] > > SELinux policy is sometimes now split so that packages can carry their > own policy subpackage. Examples include: > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/passt/blob/rawhide/f/passt.s

Re: Remove openh264?

On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 12:34 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 5:42 AM Alexander Sosedkin > wrote: > > > > On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 12:19 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 5:52 PM Chris Adams wrote: > > > > > > > > Once upon a time, Michael Catanzaro said

Re: Remove openh264?

Vitaly Zaitsev wrote: > On 28/05/2025 22:19, Chris Adams wrote: > > So it's been another month and this still isn't resolved. I know people > > on the Fedora side have been trying (don't want to complain about > > effort). But if Fedora can't reliably get timely updates to a package > > that has

Re: Remove openh264?

On 28/05/2025 22:19, Chris Adams wrote: So it's been another month and this still isn't resolved. I know people on the Fedora side have been trying (don't want to complain about effort). But if Fedora can't reliably get timely updates to a package that has high security implications, it should

Re: Fedora Non-responsive maintainer check for fab

Hi Christian, Il giorno gio 29 mag 2025 alle ore 11:07 Christian Krause < c...@fedoraproject.org> ha scritto: > File >> "/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/pysnmp/carrier/asyncore/base.py", line >> 9, in >> import asyncore >> ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'asyncore' >> >>> >> >> Whic

Fedora Non-responsive maintainer check for v02460

Hi! It seems bugs for matrix-synapse get ignored (no response on any of them), it's chronically behind in versions, and the bug that it FTBFS in rawhide also got no response. Anybody in contact with v02460? The situation has been bad for quite a while already (the update history is that is w

Re: Remove openh264?

On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 12:19 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 5:52 PM Chris Adams wrote: > > > > Once upon a time, Michael Catanzaro said: > > > On Wed, May 28 2025 at 03:19:49 PM -05:00:00, Chris Adams > > > wrote: > > > >So it's been another month and this still isn't resolve

Re: Fedora Non-responsive maintainer check for fab

Hi Federico, On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 8:42 AM Federico Pellegrin wrote: > > Il giorno gio 29 mag 2025 alle ore 06:20 Federico Pellegrin < > f...@evolware.org> ha scritto: > >> >> I'm a bit surprised about what you mention for F41 as with F40 I had >> multiple problems due to Python incompatibilit

Re: Remove openh264?

Thanks for bringing this to my attention - I had no idea Fedora would let something so serious be unfixed for so long, as I kinda assumed Fedora is on top of security updates. Time to immediately delete openh264 indeed! However: Am 29.04.25 um 19:21 schrieb Leigh Scott: sudo dnf swap *\openh

Re: Remove openh264?

On Thu, 29 May 2025 at 10:54, Jonathan Schleifer wrote: > > Thanks for bringing this to my attention - I had no idea Fedora would > let something so serious be unfixed for so long, as I kinda assumed > Fedora is on top of security updates. Time to immediately delete > openh264 indeed! However: Th

Re: Reducing reliance on "legacy" user-group store(s) like /etc/{passwd,group}

On Срд, 28 мая 2025, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Mi, 28.05.25 16:51, Alexander Bokovoy (aboko...@redhat.com) wrote: > > socket(AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM|SOCK_CLOEXEC|SOCK_NONBLOCK, 0) = 4 > > connect(4, {sa_family=AF_UNIX, sun_path="/run/systemd/userdb/io.systemd.DynamicUser"}, 45) = 0 > > socket(

Re: Slowness of installing *-selinux subpackages

On 5/29/25 3:46 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: while the SELinux tools support multi-threaded operations, it's not the default and none of the macros use it. A large portion of every existing install of a SELinux package on Fedora is a walk of the file system tree. This walk is not parallelized, and tha

Re: Slowness of installing *-selinux subpackages

On Thu, 2025-05-29 at 19:35 +0200, Petr Lautrbach wrote: > Neal Gompa writes: > > > On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 6:16 AM Richard W.M. Jones > > wrote: > > > > > > [This is a general moan / observation ... Sorry!] > > > > > > SELinux policy is sometimes now split so that packages can carry their >

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20250526.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20250525.n.1 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20250526.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 12 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size o

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20250524.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20250523.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20250524.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:9 Dropped images: 2 Added packages: 2 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 38 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 1.50 MiB Size of dropped packages:0 B S

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20250525.n.1 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20250524.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20250525.n.1 = SUMMARY = Added images:2 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 3 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 47 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 754.31 KiB Size of dropped packages:0 B

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20250523.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20250522.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20250523.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 9 Added packages: 8 Dropped packages:12 Upgraded packages: 77 Downgraded packages: 1 Size of added packages: 26.32 MiB Size of dropped packages:89.

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 4:56 PM wrote: > [...] > yarnpkg @epel-packagers-sig, ngompa, 2 weeks ago > orphan, smani Took this one since it's kind of critical, but co-maintainers welcome! -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On Thursday, May 22, 2025 3:55:55 PM Central Daylight Time maxwell--- via devel-announce wrote: > fedora-review-plugin-java orphan 1 weeks > ago > python-cerberus ngompa, orphan 2 weeks ago I've taken these. -- Robby Callic

Re: Remove openh264?

On 29/05/2025 20:34, Chuck Anderson wrote: Swap to noopenh264 instead: Since noopenh264 is just a shim, it can cause segfaults when playing H.264 videos, because ffmpeg was built with openh264 support. First, RPM Fusion's ffmpeg need to be rebuilt without openh264. Second, Firefox needs to d

Re: Remove openh264?

On 29/05/2025 21:16, Leigh Scott wrote: Rpmfusion ffmpeg is built against nopenh264 nopenh264 is just a shim. It has no codec implementation inside. I think ffmpeg need to be rebuilt without openh264 to drop the dependency. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org) -- __

Re: Remove openh264?

V Thu, May 29, 2025 at 02:29:23PM -0500, Chris Adams napsal(a): > Once upon a time, pgnd said: > > dnf config-manager setopt fedora-cisco-openh264.enabled=0 > > dnf swap '*openh264*' noopenh264 > > Updating and loading repositories: > > Repositories loaded. > > Failed to resolve the transact

Re: Remove openh264?

The procedure outlined by Chris Adams also worked for me: dnf config-manager setopt fedora-cisco-openh264.enabled=0 dnf swap '*openh264*' noopenh264 --no-best I had similar results as Simo Sorce for my dnf output, but I did not have any surprise reinstalls. Thank you for the instructions and the

Fedora eln compose report: 20250530.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-eln-20250529.n.0 NEW: Fedora-eln-20250530.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 2 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 13 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of