On Thu, 29 May 2025 at 06:04, Peter Robinson <pbrobin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 29 May 2025 at 10:54, Jonathan Schleifer <js-fed...@nil.im> wrote: > > > > Thanks for bringing this to my attention - I had no idea Fedora would > > let something so serious be unfixed for so long, as I kinda assumed > > Fedora is on top of security updates. Time to immediately delete > > openh264 indeed! However: > > This it out of Fedora's control sadly, the ability to have openh264 > easily consumable by Linux users was a complex problem due to patents, > it has generally worked fine for years. > > Personally having this enabled by default was never something I > personally agreed with. > I think that when adding outside repositories like openh264 was discussed, it was brought up multiple times this lack of support would happen. There is no incentive for the "partners" to fix these sorts of problems and there will always be a lot of incentive to put it off another day for whatever internal fires are going on. At this point, I think we should acknowledge that we as a project made a mistake and figure out how to fix this for our users. -- Stephen Smoogen, Red Hat Automotive Let us be kind to one another, for most of us are fighting a hard battle. -- Ian MacClaren
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
