OLD: Fedora-eln-20250405.n.0
NEW: Fedora-eln-20250406.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 8
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of
On Fri, Mar 28, 2025 at 06:30:58PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > 3)
> > I added the '%sysusers_create_compat' macro to my code:
> >
> > https://src.fedoraproject.org/fork/mschorm/rpms/mariadb10.11/commits/sysusers
> > but it doesn't work correctly.
This macro needs to be called
On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 06:36:09AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 6:33 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 06:23:53AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 4:40 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On
On 05-04-2025 00:45, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
Hello team,
I hit an issue when building openvdb on nanobind dependency which refuses to
use python3-nanobind at the following:
-- Found Python: /usr/bin/python3.13 (found version "3.13.2") found components:
Development Interpreter Development.Mod
On Sat, Apr 5, 2025 at 3:00 AM Sandro wrote:
>
> On 05-04-2025 00:45, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> > Hello team,
> >
> > I hit an issue when building openvdb on nanobind dependency which refuses
> > to use python3-nanobind at the following:
> >
> > -- Found Python: /usr/bin/python3.13 (found versio
Peter Robinson wrote:
> Hi Folks,
> I've orphaned python-aenum as I no longer have a need for it.
> It looks like it's needed by a few packages:
> python3-dbf-0:0.99.3-5.fc41.noarch
> python3-pyone-0:6.0.2-11.fc41.noarch
> python3-pypcapkit-0:0.15.5-12.fc41.noarch
> So it's there for someone who ne
OLD: Fedora-eln-20250321.n.0
NEW: Fedora-eln-20250322.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 3
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 26
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 4.85 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of u
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2356192
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #7 from Fedo
On 2025/03/31 13:32, Leigh Scott wrote:
Using github/gitlab sources is non-starter IMO as they rarely include the
submodules.
In the case of submodules I have had good experience using `%forgemeta`.
From a package that I am working on, I can share the simple skeleton of
how it looks like
On 2025/03/18 0:56, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
Cristian Le via devel wrote:
Coming back to `LIB_SUFFIX` and `*_INSTALL_DIR`, those should have never
been added globally [2]
Why not?
All of those, similar to `CMAKE_POLICY_VERSION_MINIMUM` hide an
underlying issue that should have been rep
Hi everyone,
I would like to unretire and take ownership of following packages:
* datanommer-commands -
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/datanommer-commands
* python-datanommer-models -
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-datanommer-models
I already have bugzilla review tickets open f
Hi,
Regarding this text [1] in the Packaging Guidelines:
"
rpm automatically creates weak dependencies (Recommends) for packages
which contain files owned by users and groups. In the future, those
depencencies will be changed to Requires.
"
The 'future' has apparently arrived, though I haven't not
On Wed, 2025-04-02 at 10:47 -0500, Michel Lind via Rust wrote:
> Dear maintainers,
>
> Fabio just flagged that below is now broken in Rawhide because
> netlink-
> packet-route is updated to an incompatible version without providing
> a
> compatibility crate
>
> https://koschei.fedoraproject.org//
On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 06:48:21PM +, Aoife Moloney via devel-announce
wrot> * mingw packages have irreproducible debug data.
Anything more information about this? What is it about the "debug
data" which is a problem, and can anything be done about it?
I assume this refers to files like
/us
Miroslav Suchý writes:
...
> Packages that are neither in SPDX nor in Callaway format (highest
> priority for now) - 32 packages:
>
> https://pagure.io/copr/license-validate/blob/main/f/neither-nor-remaining-packagers.txt
>
> Most of such packages has open issue in fedora-license-data. A lot of
Hi all.
I need to fix this issue with IceCat: for an unknown reason to me, the
icecat icon on dash is vanished (see the uploaded image, please).
Where are located those icons?
Image: https://postimg.cc/JyLdL3Cs
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitte
On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 01:39:57PM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 31/03/2025 12:53, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > This is inspired by the discussion in "Reproducible Builds" mailing list,
> > in particular [1].
>
> But auto-generated Git archives are not reproducible.
The gi
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20250401.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20250402.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:18
Upgraded packages: 85
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 50.81 KiB
Size of dropped packages:8.1
On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 6:22 PM Dan Horák wrote:
>
> On Wed, 19 Mar 2025 17:48:49 -0400
> Peter Martuccelli wrote:
>
> > Hi Davide,
> >
> > Please work with Dan, Cc'd, on any issues for Doug.
>
> ack, I believe most of Doug's packages are Infiniband related and
> should have a backup maintainer a
Just a heads up, apparently the package was accepted in the review but I'm
not sure what to do now.
I have filled an issue about being sponsored.
Guess I should just wait?
Em qui., 30 de jan. de 2025, 04:39, Benson Muite
escreveu:
> Hi Mateus,
>
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2025, at 4:57 PM, Mateus Rodrig
On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 10:48:59AM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 31 2025 at 10:53:54 AM +00:00:00, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> > This is only "SHOULD", because sometimes the git tarball is too large
> > or has other deficiencies. Another reason is that the "upstream
> >
Hi all,
a new version rpkg-1.68 together with fedpkg-1.46 are released containing
both features and bugfixes.
Currently, all supported versions (Fedora 40, Fedora 41, Fedora 42, Fedora
Rawhide, EPEL 8, EPEL 9, EPEL 10) are present in stable repositories.
Changelog (web documentation):
https://docs
On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 06:23:53AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 4:40 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 08:04:57AM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > > Dne 19. 03. 25 v 7:48 odp. Aoife Moloney via devel-announce napsal(a):
> > > > == Scope =
yselkowitz opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Tk` that you
are following:
``
Fix build with GCC 15
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Tk/pull-request/5
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-de.
On 05-04-2025 09:09, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote:
The required CMake configuration for the build backend,
nanobind-config.cmake, is provided by python3-nanobind-devel. I think
that package should provide `cmake(nanobind)` as well, since using that
is what packaging guidelines recommend and it
On 05-04-2025 09:32, Sandro wrote:
Also, upstream nanobind provides a small script to find the right
path; upstream openvdb should probably be suggested to use that:
$ python3 -c 'import nanobind; print(nanobind.cmake_dir())'
/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/nanobind/cmake
I think that's what
On Sat, Apr 5, 2025 at 3:51 AM Sandro wrote:
>
> On 05-04-2025 09:32, Sandro wrote:
> >> Also, upstream nanobind provides a small script to find the right
> >> path; upstream openvdb should probably be suggested to use that:
> >> $ python3 -c 'import nanobind; print(nanobind.cmake_dir())'
> >> /us
On 2025-04-05 03:34, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
On 05/04/2025 00:45, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
Trying to set "nanobind_DIR" does nothing. Can someone look at the
issue?
Just add -DCMAKE_PREFIX_PATH='%{python3_sitelib}/nanobind/cmake' to
%cmake macros.
I am confirming using
"-DCMAKE_
On 25. 03. 25 15:16, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 10:07 AM Benson Muite
wrote:
Aspell was deprecated with the reason that it is no longer under active
development:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/AspellDeprecation
However, it is undergoing maintenance and improvements:
ht
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
0 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2025-4389396ea7
suricata-7.0.9-1.el8
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing
onedrive-2.5.5-1.el8
partclone-0.3.34-1.el8
py
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2354075
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2025-608a18c02d has been pushed to the Fedora 42 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --ref
On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 08:54:45AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore via devel wrote:
> Failed to resolve the transaction:
> Problem 1: installed package python3-qt5-webkit-5.15.10-11.fc41.x86_64
> requires python3-qt5(x86-64) = 5.15.10-11.fc41, but none of the
> providers can be installed
> - python3-qt5-5.
OLD: Fedora-eln-20250319.n.0
NEW: Fedora-eln-20250320.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 26
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 566.51 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of
On 05/04/2025 00:45, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
Trying to set "nanobind_DIR" does nothing. Can someone look at the issue?
Just add -DCMAKE_PREFIX_PATH='%{python3_sitelib}/nanobind/cmake' to
%cmake macros.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
--
___
+1 on sddm with awesomewm; that's my current setup on F41 and what I intend
to use until I decide to find something else...
On Wed, Apr 2, 2025 at 4:00 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 2, 2025 at 3:55 PM W. Michael Petullo wrote:
> >
> > Is there any hope of running the awesome X11 window man
Hi all,
does anybody know how to contact Doug Ledford (FAS: dledford) ? I was
about to needinfo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2321324
and that's when I noticed the account seems to be deactivated in
Bugzilla, but they're listed as the primary maintainer for several
packages: htt
On Wed, 19 Mar 2025 17:48:49 -0400
Peter Martuccelli wrote:
> Hi Davide,
>
> Please work with Dan, Cc'd, on any issues for Doug.
ack, I believe most of Doug's packages are Infiniband related and
should have a backup maintainer at Red Hat, but I will check closer on
Friday when I am back at work
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2355709
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from Fedo
On 3/20/25 3:36 PM, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
Hello team,
Blender failed to build with this following line:
'''
[4%] Generating kernel_gfx1010.fatbin
cd
/builddir/build/BUILD/blender-4.4.0-build/blender-4.4.0/redhat-linux-build/intern/cycles/kernel
&& /usr/lib64/rocm/llvm/bin/clang++ --offlo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2353463
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-DBIx-Class-Schema-Load |perl-DBIx-Class-Schema-Load
On Wed, Apr 2, 2025 at 12:16 PM JT wrote:
>
> I tested a bunch of TTS in the past, but within the past year there's been a
> bunch of additional ones that have come out that I havent had time to tinker
> with.
> How do you think Piper compares with the others currently available? Parler
> TTS,
A lot of perl packages (at least) use the macro %{_fixpermss}. Defined
in /usr/lib/rpm/macros (from rpm itself), the macro uses chmod. When
reviewing a new package of mine, the reviewer said I should BR
coreutils because of that, which makes sense... although thinking about
it, should a package r
On Sat, Apr 5, 2025 at 8:45 PM Chris Adams wrote:
>
> A lot of perl packages (at least) use the macro %{_fixpermss}. Defined
> in /usr/lib/rpm/macros (from rpm itself), the macro uses chmod. When
> reviewing a new package of mine, the reviewer said I should BR
> coreutils because of that, which
On Tue, Mar 25, 2025, at 7:51 PM, Michael J Gruber wrote:
> Adam Williamson venit, vidit, dixit 2025-03-25 17:07:25:
>> On Tue, 2025-03-25 at 15:34 +0100, Michael J Gruber wrote:
>> > Am Di., 25. März 2025 um 15:20 Uhr schrieb Miro Hrončok
>> > :
>> > >
>> > > On 25. 03. 25 15:16, Neal Gompa wr
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20250320.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20250321.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 4
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 109
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 13.53 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
OLD: Fedora-42-20250404.n.0
NEW: Fedora-42-20250405.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 5
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
46 matches
Mail list logo
