OLD: Fedora-eln-20250320.n.0
NEW: Fedora-eln-20250321.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 33
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 188.37 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size
* [Text
Log](https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2025-03-20/eln.2025-03-20-19.02.log.txt)
* [HTML
Log](https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2025-03-20/eln.2025-03-20-19.02.log.html)
* [Text
Minutes](https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/me
Il 20/03/25 10:14, Daniel P. Berrangé ha scritto:
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 03:22:08PM -0700, Davide Cavalca wrote:
>> On 2025-03-19 14:48, Peter Martuccelli wrote:
>>> Hi Davide,
>>>
>>> Please work with Dan, Cc'd, on any issues for Doug.
>> Thanks Peter. My immediate concern is getting mstflint u
On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 12:57:38PM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> Il 20/03/25 10:14, Daniel P. Berrangé ha scritto:
> > On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 03:22:08PM -0700, Davide Cavalca wrote:
> >> On 2025-03-19 14:48, Peter Martuccelli wrote:
> >>> Hi Davide,
> >>>
> >>> Please work with Dan, Cc'd,
Dne 20. 03. 25 v 11:23 dop. Neal Gompa napsal(a):
It's also notreally hermetic either. Hermetic builds require true
isolation and there is no Mock backend that provides that right now.
All it does is let you pre-download the build environment and replay
it multiple times.
OK. We can argue if sy
On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 6:42 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> Dne 20. 03. 25 v 11:23 dop. Neal Gompa napsal(a):
> > It's also notreally hermetic either. Hermetic builds require true
> > isolation and there is no Mock backend that provides that right now.
> > All it does is let you pre-download the bui
On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 7:14 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 06:36:09AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 6:33 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 06:23:53AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Mar
On Thu, Mar 20, 2025, at 3:27 PM, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
> Rebuilderd isn't much of a build system but more an orchestrator, it
> scans a Fedora repo's metadata for new packages and queue's them up for
> building.
You could also listen to the appropriate channel(s) in fedmsg, that way you
wou
Hello team,
Blender failed to build with this following line:
'''
[4%] Generating kernel_gfx1010.fatbin
cd
/builddir/build/BUILD/blender-4.4.0-build/blender-4.4.0/redhat-linux-build/intern/cycles/kernel
&& /usr/lib64/rocm/llvm/bin/clang++ --offload-arch=gfx1010 --genco
/builddir/build/BUILD/b
I can take a look.
A better way to contact ROCm folks is through this matrix group we hang out in.
https://matrix.to/#/#ai-ml:fedoraproject.org
or email me directly.
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email
On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 06:48:21PM +, Aoife Moloney via devel-announce
wrote:
>
> == Scope ==
> * Proposal owners:
> ** Package [https://github.com/keszybz/fedora-repro-build
> fedora-repro-build] to allow local rebuilds of historical koji builds
> ** Make [https://github.com/kpcyrd/rebuilder
On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 10:10:23AM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 20. 03. 25 v 9:39 dop. Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
> > > https://rpm-software-management.github.io/mock/feature-hermetic-builds
> > Yes, thanks for the link. I think this didn't exist when I started working
> > on my s
On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 10:13:25AM +0100, Simon de Vlieger wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2025, at 9:18 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>
> > Can we have this run as part of the post-build gating tests, so
> > that we have a single place to look for test results, along with
> > the option for maintainers
On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 09:00:09AM +0100, Dmitry Belyavskiy wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> > We are aware of some issues that cannot be fixed easily:
> > * Haskell packages are not reproducible when compiled with more than
> > one thread. Upstream is
> > [https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/-/issues/12935
On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 08:04:57AM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 19. 03. 25 v 7:48 odp. Aoife Moloney via devel-announce napsal(a):
> > == Scope ==
> > * Proposal owners:
> > ** Package [https://github.com/keszybz/fedora-repro-build
> > fedora-repro-build] to allow local rebuilds of historical
On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 08:18:15AM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 06:48:21PM +, Aoife Moloney via devel-announce
> wrote:
> >
> > == Scope ==
> > * Proposal owners:
> > ** Package [https://github.com/keszybz/fedora-repro-build
> > fedora-repro-build] to allow local
Dne 20. 03. 25 v 9:39 dop. Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
https://rpm-software-management.github.io/mock/feature-hermetic-builds
Yes, thanks for the link. I think this didn't exist when I started working
on my script to do rebuilds, so I just gather the rpms reported by koji
to have been
On Thu, Mar 20, 2025, at 9:18 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> Can we have this run as part of the post-build gating tests, so
> that we have a single place to look for test results, along with
> the option for maintainers to waive reproducibility issues ?
>
> I'm pretty unethusiastic about dealing
On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 03:22:08PM -0700, Davide Cavalca wrote:
> On 2025-03-19 14:48, Peter Martuccelli wrote:
> > Hi Davide,
> >
> > Please work with Dan, Cc'd, on any issues for Doug.
>
> Thanks Peter. My immediate concern is getting mstflint updated to 4.31 if
> possible, and resolving the ou
Dne 19. 03. 25 v 7:48 odp. Aoife Moloney via devel-announce napsal(a):
== Scope ==
* Proposal owners:
** Package [https://github.com/keszybz/fedora-repro-build
fedora-repro-build] to allow local rebuilds of historical koji builds
This
https://rpm-software-management.github.io/mock/feature-herm
Hello,
> We are aware of some issues that cannot be fixed easily:
> * Haskell packages are not reproducible when compiled with more than
> one thread. Upstream is
> [https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/-/issues/12935 working on the
> issue], the next release of ghc may resolve the issue completely
On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 4:40 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 08:04:57AM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > Dne 19. 03. 25 v 7:48 odp. Aoife Moloney via devel-announce napsal(a):
> > > == Scope ==
> > > * Proposal owners:
> > > ** Package [https://github.com/keszybz/
On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 09:57:23AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> * mingw packages have irreproducible debug data.
>
> Anything more information about this? What is it about the "debug
> data" which is a problem, and can anything be done about it?
>
> I assume this refers to files like
> /us
Dne 20. 03. 25 v 10:26 dop. Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
Can we discuss it here, at least in the rough outline?
Sure. I think Pavel will anwer it better. He should be back on Monday.
Building 30k packages locally? With frequent updates for lots of them. Does it
scale?
Yeah, it sca
On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 6:33 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 06:23:53AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 4:40 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 08:04:57AM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > > > Dne 19.
On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 11:16:55AM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 20. 03. 25 v 10:26 dop. Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
> > Can we discuss it here, at least in the rough outline?
>
> Sure. I think Pavel will anwer it better. He should be back on Monday.
>
> > > Building 30k packages
Thank you very much, looks like now it is pushed to stable
On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 6:35 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 10:26:33AM +0100, Dmitry Belyavskiy wrote:
> > Dear Petr,
> > Thank you for the investigation!
> > I think it happened because the build happened during the fre
On 20/03/2025 09:39, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 08:04:57AM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Dne 19. 03. 25 v 7:48 odp. Aoife Moloney via devel-announce napsal(a):
== Scope ==
* Proposal owners:
** Package [https://github.com/keszybz/fedora-repro-build
fedora-repro-bu
On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 07:33:22AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> And it screws up both package builds and image builds in weird ways.
> For example, two builds of fish cannot run at the same time in Koji
> because the test suite will lock up and fail due to shared devfs
> devices from the host into th
On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 11:37:40PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2025-03-20 at 03:43 +, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 3:26 AM Gary Buhrmaster
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > I accidentally did not specify a side-tag target,
> > > so this build will break rawhide. Sorry
Failed to resolve the transaction:
Problem 1: installed package python3-qt5-webkit-5.15.10-11.fc41.x86_64
requires python3-qt5(x86-64) = 5.15.10-11.fc41, but none of the
providers can be installed
- python3-qt5-5.15.10-11.fc41.x86_64 does not belong to a
distupgrade repository
- problem with in
31 matches
Mail list logo
