On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 11:16:55AM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 20. 03. 25 v 10:26 dop. Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
> > Can we discuss it here, at least in the rough outline?
> 
> Sure. I think Pavel will anwer it better. He should be back on Monday.
> 
> > > Building 30k packages locally? With frequent updates for lots of them. 
> > > Does it scale?
> > Yeah, it scales surprisingly well. We skip %check, and for now only
> > build on two architectures, so that saves a lot of time.
> 
> Interresting. While this is likely technically incorrect because %check may 
> modify the buildroot
> 
>   https://github.com/rpm-software-management/mock/issues/1352
> 
> it may actually reveal such cases where %check do something with the 
> buildroot.

Yes, it does indeed happen, but I think we should treat that as a bug.
(I recall vaguely one or two cases where I found that skipping %check
made a difference, some timestamps were modified or something like that.
But those cases are generally easy to fix.)

Zbyszek
-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to