Hi Adrian,
great to hear your experience with the Fedora community is still
resonating in you.
I'm the maintainer of MariaDB & MySQL packages and I can very much
recommend MariaDB upstream.
There are very friendly and helpful people.
They can be easily reached on the web-browser chat:
https://mari
On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 4:11 PM Eike Rathke wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Monday, 2025-01-27 19:03:35 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> > In an effort to avoid the large amount of breakage during the mass
> > rebuild that happened with GCC 15 and Go 1.24 landing only *hours*
> > before it was started
>
>
On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 11:51 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 11:13:24PM +0100, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 11:05 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 07:18:23AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 08:21:26AM -0500,
On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 9:18 PM Sérgio Basto via devel
wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I will start a mass rebuild [1] in a side-tag, very soon, please let me
> know we have any objection that prevent to proceeding.
>
> Best regards,
>
> [1]
> dnf repoquery --repoid=rawhide --whatrequires "libjxl*" --qf
> "%{re
Hello Fedora Devel!
Since finishing my internship as an intern working with Justin Flory on Commops
and Community Architecture work, I have gone back to school to finish my degree
and have resumed my TA position for a class about Free and Open Source Software
with a focus primarily on community
Hi,
I will start a mass rebuild [1] in a side-tag, very soon, please let me
know we have any objection that prevent to proceeding.
Best regards,
[1]
dnf repoquery --repoid=rawhide --whatrequires "libjxl*" --qf
"%{repoid} %{sourcerpm}\n" | pkgname
rawhide GraphicsMagick
rawhide ImageMagick
ra
Hi!
$SUBJ
Nothing should break, but please let me know if it does!
PR: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/dracut/pull-request/70
Regards,
Pavel
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lis
On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 07:18:23AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 08:21:26AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > If Koschei could trigger non-scratch rebuilds, that would go a long
> > way toward this.
Note that koschei just rebuilds existing src.rpms in scratch builds.
Getting it
On 2025-01-30 17:33, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 10:01:09AM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Thanks for clarifying. Of course one reason for mass rebuild can be that we
are not able to properly identify the package set for more targeted mini
mass rebuild.
But IMHO, having just the Copr
It appears that libgit2 1.9 was also pushed to F41 as an update, but there was
no notice of that. This included an soname change from libgit2.so.1.8 to
libgit2.so.1.9, so some warning of a change on F41 would have been appreciated.
--
___
devel mailing
On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 11:05 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 07:18:23AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 08:21:26AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > If Koschei could trigger non-scratch rebuilds, that would go a long
> > > way toward this.
>
> Note that kos
On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 10:01:09AM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Thanks for clarifying. Of course one reason for mass rebuild can be that we
> are not able to properly identify the package set for more targeted mini
> mass rebuild.
>
> But IMHO, having just the Copr build to identify the problema
On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 11:13:24PM +0100, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 11:05 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 07:18:23AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 08:21:26AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > > If Koschei could trigger non-scratch r
Hi,
On Monday, 2025-01-27 19:03:35 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> In an effort to avoid the large amount of breakage during the mass
> rebuild that happened with GCC 15 and Go 1.24 landing only *hours*
> before it was started
Not only, I suspect an upgrade from rust-1.83.0 to rust-1.84.0 being
It’s time for another flatbuffers update,
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/flatbuffers/pull-request/14. As
always, this is ABI-incompatible and bumps the SONAME version. This
update will land after F42 branching, so it will be for F42/Branched and
F43/Rawhide.
I impact-checked the dependent
Hello everyone,
just a reminder that both github2fedmsg and fedmsg will be
decommissioned in Fedora Infrastructure on 3rd February 2025 (Monday).
If you are using any of those services you need to migrate to
webhook2fedmsg (github2fedmsg replacement) or fedora-messaging [1]
(fedmsg replaceme
On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 07:32:49PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Dne 28. 01. 25 v 19:18 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
...snip...
> > Mass rebuilding which? Rawhide or the new branched? Or both?
>
>
> I am talking about Rawhide
>
>
> > rawhide would be fine, but all those changes would have to be made
On Wed, Jan 29, 2025, at 3:56 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 09:51:28AM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>> While the ring idea as presented there didn't come to exist inside
>> Fedora as a community, I think we can see that concept has indeed
>> grown up outside Fedora.
>
> Ye
On Wed, Dec 4, 2024 at 10:25 AM Tom Hughes via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On 04/12/2024 09:11, Petr Pisar wrote:
>
> > BTW, it seems that "git send-email" is broken in Rawhide: Having
> installed
> > git-2.47.1-1.fc42.x86_64 package, the subcommand is not available.
>
> It see
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20250129.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20250130.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 10
Dropped packages:25
Upgraded packages: 167
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 10.11 MiB
Size of dropped packages
On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 11:31:33AM +0300, Benson Muite wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2025, at 3:56 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 09:51:28AM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > What do we gain from building, say, Inkscape ourselves — other than allowing
> > us to check the boxes
21 matches
Mail list logo
