Fedora-Cloud-30-20200206.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap

Re: Change proposal discussion - Optimize SquashFS Size

On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 12:01 AM Kevin Kofler wrote: > Oh, and to answer your other point: > > Lukas Brabec wrote: > > It is pretty common for us in Fedora QA (well, I'm quite biased in this > > case). > > And no, we cannot compose our images, we have to test the exact same > > images that will be

Re: new maintainer for tmuxinator

On 06. 02. 20 4:21, Dusty Mabe wrote: It was orphaned recently. Anybody care to pick it up? :) https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/tmuxinator To clarify: It was retired recently. (I've noticed people confuse the terms all the time and was wondering what to do about it without changing them.)

Re: Change proposal discussion - Optimize SquashFS Size

On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 12:01 AM Kevin Kofler wrote: > So you propose to optimize Fedora for your own internal use at the expense > of thousands of users? > Optimizing for automated QA and CI will increase the quality for everyone (perhaps not immediately, but definitely in the long run, at least

Re: Change proposal discussion - Optimize SquashFS Size

Hello everybody, as I see it, we all want the same, but the priorities differ. My several cents (although I will repeat myself): *Let us properly curate the composes in terms of shipped applications (a.k.a essential applications)* Explanation: Our composes ship too many applications. By making a c

Re: Change proposal discussion - Optimize SquashFS Size

On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 11:58 PM Kevin Kofler wrote: > Kamil Paral wrote: > > I have already responded to your exaggerated numbers once, and you didn't > > even reply. "Hours of difference" for "a few percent increase", let's say > > 3 hours for 3 percent increase, means 100 hours total download t

Fedora-Cloud-31-20200206.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap

Re: new maintainer for tmuxinator

On Thu, 2020-02-06 at 09:19 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 06. 02. 20 4:21, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > It was orphaned recently. Anybody care to pick it up? :) > > > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/tmuxinator > > To clarify: It was retired recently. > > (I've noticed people confuse the terms al

Re: fleet-commander* main admin

Thanks! I will do the process for the package retirement after getting to speed today and check the bugzilla. Cheers, On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 6:34 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 05. 02. 20 19:04, Oliver Gutierrez wrote: > > Hi there. As Alberto has stated, I was on paternity leave and I will be > b

Re: gcc -fno-common

Jakub Jelinek writes: > On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 05:13:27PM +, Dave Love wrote: >> GCC doesn't document the targets for which -fno-common produces better >> code. Can someone say for which of the Fedora ones it makes a >> difference? > > E.g. on any that is capable of vectorization. Thanks.

Re: Possible gcc/s390x bug (was Re: Mass rebuild status)

Mamoru TASAKA writes: > Filed: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1798636 For what it's worth, I'd have raised an issue if it has a different cause, and doesn't fixed along with the original regression, lest it looks as if I'm shirking bug reporting responsibilities. ___

Re: gcc -fno-common

On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 11:01:56AM +, Dave Love wrote: > Jakub Jelinek writes: > > > On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 05:13:27PM +, Dave Love wrote: > >> GCC doesn't document the targets for which -fno-common produces better > >> code. Can someone say for which of the Fedora ones it makes a > >>

Re: Ceph license change

On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 3:45 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > Iff the above is correct, the license field should say: > > (LGPL-2.1 or LGPL-3.0) and CC-BY-SA-3.0 and GPL-2.0 and BSL-1.0 and > BSD-3-Clause > and MIT > > > (If we ignore that those are probably SPDX license identifiers and not > what > Fed

Re: Ceph license change

On 06. 02. 20 12:16, Kaleb Keithley wrote: On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 3:45 PM Miro Hrončok > wrote: Iff the above is correct, the license field should say: (LGPL-2.1 or LGPL-3.0) and CC-BY-SA-3.0 and GPL-2.0 and BSL-1.0 and BSD-3-Clause and MIT

Re: new maintainer for tmuxinator

On 06/02/2020 09:19, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 06. 02. 20 4:21, Dusty Mabe wrote: >> It was orphaned recently. Anybody care to pick it up? :) >> >> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/tmuxinator > > To clarify: It was retired recently. > > (I've noticed people confuse the terms all the time and was

Re: new maintainer for tmuxinator

On 06. 02. 20 12:46, David Sommerseth wrote: On 06/02/2020 09:19, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 06. 02. 20 4:21, Dusty Mabe wrote: It was orphaned recently. Anybody care to pick it up? :) https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/tmuxinator To clarify: It was retired recently. (I've noticed people confus

Re: new maintainer for tmuxinator

On Thu, Feb 6, 2020, 12:47 David Sommerseth wrote: > On 06/02/2020 09:19, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 06. 02. 20 4:21, Dusty Mabe wrote: > >> It was orphaned recently. Anybody care to pick it up? :) > >> > >> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/tmuxinator > > > > To clarify: It was retired recently

NeuroFedora review swaps: python-littleutils; python-outdated

Hello, Updating python-pingouin to the latest version requires python-outdated, which requires python-littleutils. Would anyone like to swap reviews please? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1798944 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1798940 These are trivial python packages,

Any issues booting Rawhide kernel-5.6.0-0.rc0.git1.2.fc32.x86_64?

I tried out this kernel: - kernel-5.6.0-0.rc0.git1.2.fc32.x86_64 It gets to grub, lets you select the kernel, but apparently no further. It's kind of frustrating to debug because either it produces *no* messages at all even in verbose mode, or else it's screwing up the display somehow so that no

Re: Any issues booting Rawhide kernel-5.6.0-0.rc0.git1.2.fc32.x86_64?

I have the same issue since 5.5.0 release kernel. Latest one which works for me is 5.5.0-rc6.git3.2. I was not sure how to debug this, so I did not submit a bug report. I have this issue on the ThinkPad T480s with latest firmwares and so on. On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 2:10 PM Richard W.M. Jones wr

Re: Any issues booting Rawhide kernel-5.6.0-0.rc0.git1.2.fc32.x86_64?

On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 13:02:32 +, "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote: I tried out this kernel: - kernel-5.6.0-0.rc0.git1.2.fc32.x86_64 It gets to grub, lets you select the kernel, but apparently no further. It's kind of frustrating to debug because either it produces *no* messages at all even

Re: Change proposal discussion - Optimize SquashFS Size

Josef Skladanka wrote: > Assuming that your numbers are even accurate (which I have not seen any > proof of so far), your vaguely defined "thousands" (semantically implies < > 10, but absolutely < 20k, especially since you tend to use hyperbole, and > that would definitely be "tens of thousands" to

satyr soname bump

satyr 0.30 was built with a bumped soname. AFAIK, this will only affect us, but for anyone else out there - beware. -- Ernestas Kulik Associate Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems (Core Services/ABRT) Red Hat Czech, s.r.o. ___ devel mailing list

Re: Change proposal discussion - Optimize SquashFS Size

Lukas Ruzicka wrote: > PS: KDE, especially, is very generous about unnecessary applications. Why > do I need three web browsers installed? Because the KDE SIG still procrastinates dropping Firefox, even though it is a non-KDE application that has no business being on the KDE Spin, and Falkon is

Re: Change proposal discussion - Optimize SquashFS Size

On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 3:06 PM Kevin Kofler wrote: > Hence, the remainder of your post is a strawman based on entirely > fictional > "statistics". > > I'm glad you agree that your own argumentation is flawed, since it's based entirely on fictional statistics :) Since you not only presented no pr

Re: Change proposal discussion - Optimize SquashFS Size

Kamil Paral wrote: > Yet you're one of the few people caring about the KDE spin, where major > applications are duplicated or triplicated.There are 3 different web > browsers(!), 2 different package managers, 2 file managers. I am not the one who makes the decisions on what goes on the Spin. The

Re: gcc -fno-common

Jakub Jelinek writes: > Note, if for whatever reason one wants the common behavior e.g. on a few > selected variables, one can add __attribute__((__common__)) to those > variables to override the default, it doesn't have to be just -fcommon > that changes the behavior of all non-automatic variabl

Re: NeuroFedora review swaps: python-littleutils; python-outdated

Hello there I will be happy to take these reviews (since they seem to be very easy :P). On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 5:36 PM Ankur Sinha wrote: > > Hello, > > Updating python-pingouin to the latest version requires python-outdated, > which requires python-littleutils. > > Would anyone like to swap rev

Re: Any plans on maintaining Apache NetBeans

FYI, I'm still planning on working on the Java packaging issues. But, still working on figuring out how to do the work. I've had a lot of other problems come up lately so I have not made too much progress. But, I still expect to be working on this soon. On Wednesday, February 5, 2020, 9:11

Highlights from the latest Copr release

Hello, recently (on Feb 06, 2020) a new Copr release landed production. Here is the list of visible changes: - Users now can build packages against explicitly enabled modules. Go to `Project -> Settings -> Build Options -> [Edit] button (near _enabled_ chroot) -> Enable module: textarea`.

Re: epel8: BuildrootError: could not init mock buildroot

On 2020-02-05 15:41, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Mon, Feb 03, 2020 at 11:45:38AM -0500, John Florian wrote: On 2020-01-30 20:42, Kevin Fenzi wrote: I fear it's just bad timing + the external rhel8 repo we have only keeps the newest packages (epel7 repos keep the old packages around too). koji has no

Re: Change proposal discussion - Optimize SquashFS Size

On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 03:05:26PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > […]Fedora reportedly has millions of users, but I have no way of telling how > many of those are actually affected by the longer download time […] To add another aspect, that cannot be counted properly (and thus being a personal pref

License change for rust-tokio-process

rust-tokio-process-0.2.5-1.fc32 changed from MIT/Apache-2.0 to just MIT. This occurred upstream when it merged into the tokio project: https://github.com/tokio-rs/tokio/pull/1320 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send

Re: Any issues booting Rawhide kernel-5.6.0-0.rc0.git1.2.fc32.x86_64?

On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 7:03 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > I tried out this kernel: > > - kernel-5.6.0-0.rc0.git1.2.fc32.x86_64 > > It gets to grub, lets you select the kernel, but apparently no > further. It's kind of frustrating to debug because either it produces > *no* messages at all even

Re: new maintainer for tmuxinator

https://pagure.io/pagure/blob/master/f/pagure/templates/repo_info.html#_77 PRs are welcome ( for this and any other fix :D ) 2020(e)ko otsailaren 6(a) 13:01:26 (CET)-(e)an, Fabio Valentini -(e)k hau idatzi zuen: >On Thu, Feb 6, 2020, 12:47 David Sommerseth wrote: > >> On 06/02/2020 09:19, Miro

kernel rpm split

Hello kernel maintainers, hello Fedora developers, I'm looking into the split of kernel packages. The split into subpackages seems interesting, but there are many dependencies between the packages, so it is usual to end up with all of them installed. E.g. for a simple VM, by design, kernel-core c

Re: kernel rpm split

On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 1:56 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > Hello kernel maintainers, hello Fedora developers, > > I'm looking into the split of kernel packages. The split into subpackages > seems interesting, but there are many dependencies between the packages, > so it is usual to end

Re: kernel rpm split

On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 02:13:25PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 1:56 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > > > > Hello kernel maintainers, hello Fedora developers, > > > > I'm looking into the split of kernel packages. The split into subpackages > > seems interesting, but

Re: kernel rpm split

On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 2:40 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 02:13:25PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 1:56 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > > wrote: > > > > > > Hello kernel maintainers, hello Fedora developers, > > > > > > I'm looking into t

Re: Change proposal discussion - Optimize SquashFS Size

On Mon, Feb 03, 2020 at 05:22:55PM +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: Le 2020-02-03 17:11, David Cantrell a écrit : Hi, We want input from the community on what the main goal should be and prioritize the rest. For example, is ISO reduction size more important than improving installation time, fo

Re: Change proposal discussion - Optimize SquashFS Size

On Tue, Feb 04, 2020 at 01:21:33PM +0100, Kamil Paral wrote: On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 5:55 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: So, I propose: reduce install time reduce image size reduce compose time is the order we should put them in I very much agree with this. The official compose gets done just once,

How to invite others to projects on Taiga?

Hello, How does one invite other FAS holders to a Taiga project? I can go to "Add member" in settings, but the text box does not complete FAS ids, and the only way to invite any one is to enter an e-mail address. Should one use @fedoraproject.org to invite others? -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinh

Re: kernel rpm split

On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 2:40 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 02:13:25PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 1:56 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > > wrote: > > > > > > Hello kernel maintainers, hello Fedora developers, > > > > > > I'm looking into t

Re: kernel rpm split

On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 03:09:53PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 2:40 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > > > > On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 02:13:25PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 1:56 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Hello

Re: Change proposal discussion - Optimize SquashFS Size

On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 03:34:23PM -0500, David Cantrell wrote: > On Mon, Feb 03, 2020 at 05:22:55PM +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > >Hardware with low connectivity or low storage (chromebooks, vms) > Your note about Chromebooks here is good. I don't have a Chromebook > and do not know the main i

Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog

On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 04:34:37PM +, Leigh Griffin wrote: > On behalf of the CPE team I want to draw the communities attention to a > recent blog post which you may be impacted by: > https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/git-forge-requirements/ > > We will be seeking input and requirement

Re: Any issues booting Rawhide kernel-5.6.0-0.rc0.git1.2.fc32.x86_64?

On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 07:32:09 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote: 5.6.0-0.rc0.git2.1.fc32.x86_64 works. If last nights rawhide compose finishes successfully this morning, there should be a working kernel in the repo. The nodebug repo hasn't been updated since the work around was implemented, s

ClamAV: CVE-2020-3123 needs addressing - 102.2 available

Hi, Clam released a security update for CVE-2020-3123 as releaseversion 102.2 yesterday. As it can cause at least a remotely initiated denial of service, addressing it, sounds adequate. I just checked bodhi and koji, but i dodn't find any sign of a coming build. Can someone trigger the maintaine

Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog

On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 4:14 PM Till Maas wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 04:34:37PM +, Leigh Griffin wrote: > > > On behalf of the CPE team I want to draw the communities attention to a > > recent blog post which you may be impacted by: > > https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/git-forge

Re: ClamAV: CVE-2020-3123 needs addressing - 102.2 available

On 2/6/20 2:46 PM, Marius Schwarz wrote: > Hi, > > Clam released a security update for CVE-2020-3123 as releaseversion > 102.2 yesterday. > As it can cause at least a remotely initiated denial of service, > addressing it, sounds adequate. > > I just checked bodhi and koji, but i dodn't find any s

Re: Mass rebuild reminders (Ben Cotton)

Hi, there are two packages mentioned for me as maintainer: gnurobbo and xvkbd Both packages FTBFS due to many errors like "ld: multiple definition of ..." I suspect a general issue with gcc 10 as others have already detected. My opinion is to orphan both of my packages because I don't know how

Re: Mass rebuild reminders (Ben Cotton)

On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 4:18 PM Raphael Groner wrote: > there are two packages mentioned for me as maintainer: gnurobbo and xvkbd > > Both packages FTBFS due to many errors like > "ld: multiple definition of ..." > > I suspect a general issue with gcc 10 as others have already detected. > My opinio

Re: Mass rebuild reminders (Ben Cotton)

On 07. 02. 20 0:17, Raphael Groner wrote: Hi, there are two packages mentioned for me as maintainer: gnurobbo and xvkbd Both packages FTBFS due to many errors like "ld: multiple definition of ..." I suspect a general issue with gcc 10 as others have already detected. My opinion is to orphan bo

FedoraRespin-31-updates-20200206.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 1/18 (x86_64) ID: 517891 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso release_identification URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/517891 Passed openQA tests: 17/18 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose __

Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog

On Thu, Feb 6, 2020, 21:14 Till Maas wrote: > On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 04:34:37PM +, Leigh Griffin wrote: > > > On behalf of the CPE team I want to draw the communities attention to a > > recent blog post which you may be impacted by: > > https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/git-forge-requ

Re: satyr soname bump

What does it mean "us? I see that ABRT has broken dependencies in rawhide. I would appreciate if you could use side tag to build new version + rebuild all packages which depend on it in there. On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 3:15 PM Ernestas Kulik wrote: > > satyr 0.30 was built with a bumped soname. AFAI

Re: satyr soname bump

On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 07:17:51AM +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > What does it mean "us? I see that ABRT has broken dependencies in > rawhide. I would appreciate if you could use side tag to build new > version + rebuild all packages which depend on it in there. So, this was breaking rawhide compos

Re: How to invite others to projects on Taiga?

It's a bit clunky, but the following works for me: 1/ Ask them to log in to Taiga first — they need to do that so Taiga creates an account for them internally 2/ Add them by their FAS (Fedora Account System) email — you can use zodbot on irc, asking it "fas THEIR_FAS" or "fasinfo THEIR_FAS" ... t

Re: satyr soname bump

On Fri, 2020-02-07 at 07:17 +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > What does it mean "us? I see that ABRT has broken dependencies in > rawhide. I would appreciate if you could use side tag to build new > version + rebuild all packages which depend on it in there. I don’t know, seems pretty self-explanatory

Re: How to invite others to projects on Taiga?

On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 08:18:29 +0100, Adam Samalik wrote: > It's a bit clunky, but the following works for me: > > 1/ Ask them to log in to Taiga first — they need to do that so Taiga creates > an > account for them internally > 2/ Add them by their FAS (Fedora Account System) email — you can use