On 06. 02. 20 12:16, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 3:45 PM Miro Hrončok <mhron...@redhat.com
<mailto:mhron...@redhat.com>> wrote:
Iff the above is correct, the license field should say:
(LGPL-2.1 or LGPL-3.0) and CC-BY-SA-3.0 and GPL-2.0 and BSL-1.0 and
BSD-3-Clause
and MIT
(If we ignore that those are probably SPDX license identifiers and not what
Fedora uses.
Using Fedora short names from [1], and in English (vs. pseudo-code), this is
what I'm tentatively planning to change the ceph.spec file in Fedora to:
License: LGPLv2.1 or LGPLv3, CC-BY-SA-3.0, GPLv2, Boost-1.0, BSD, and MIT
The pseudo-code is actually required:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/#_combined_dual_and_multiple_licensing_scenario
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
