Hi,
warzone2100 fails to build [1] and I have no idea how to fix that.
Most of the errors are:
main_sdl.cpp:79:13: error: expected unqualified-id before '__attribute__'
static std::vector displaylist; // holds all our possible
display lists
^
main_sdl.cpp:117:29: error: cannot conve
On Mon, 20 Feb 2017 09:15:46 +0100
Jan Synacek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> warzone2100 fails to build [1] and I have no idea how to fix that.
> Most of the errors are:
it's a known problem on ppc64le, please search this lists archive, it
was discussed recently (switching from --std=c++11 to --std=gnu++11
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 09:15:46AM +0100, Jan Synacek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> warzone2100 fails to build [1] and I have no idea how to fix that.
> Most of the errors are:
>
> main_sdl.cpp:79:13: error: expected unqualified-id before '__attribute__'
> static std::vector displaylist; // holds all our pos
On 02/20/2017 09:27 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
That looks like C++ and altivec.h on PowerPC. altivec.h changes the
meaning of bool and vector keywords, so it is essential in what order
and what mode you include it if you really need it (easiest is of course
not include it at all). In general, for
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 9:27 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 09:15:46AM +0100, Jan Synacek wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> warzone2100 fails to build [1] and I have no idea how to fix that.
>> Most of the errors are:
>>
>> main_sdl.cpp:79:13: error: expected unqualified-id before '__attribu
Hello,
I'm orphaning the sniproxy package because I no longer use it and
haproxy seems to be quite superior in features/performance. If you are
interested please consider adopting it.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/sniproxy/
regards,
Nikos
I just built python-docker in rawhide.
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=860378
The biggest change is that `python-docker` does NOT provide `python-docker-py`,
this means two things:
1. You can't have both packages installed.
2. You can still use `python-docker-py`.
3. You
Quite frankly, I don't think Fedora is suitable for people with low
bandwidth, simply because of its nature of updating policy. Even when using
proxy with squid cache for packages, packages updates constantly and cache
becomes obsolete very quickly. CentOS is much better choice.
___
Le 2017-02-20 05:47, Fa Be a écrit :
1. It is huge for people of developing and un-developed countries.
2. It need to a DVD disc and DVD ROM for install via Optical Disc Drive
(ODD).
3. It is a traffic wasting option, because all the software inside it
is not necessarily used, like Libre Offic
On Sun, 2017-02-19 at 18:08 -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 3:50 PM, Matthew Miller
> wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 11:29:37AM -, Fa Be wrote:
> > > It will be very beneficial for people if the Fedora project
> > > provides
> > > the Minimal CD images of Fedora.
We have moved the documentation of the Modularity project from wiki [1] to
Pagure Docs [2]!
The documentation is build using Python Sphinx with custom theme that also
includes the home page. To edit the documentation, please send
pull-requests against the source repository [3].
[1] https://fedor
And build your own kernel and compile other applications from source?
Wouldn't that fragment the system? That might lead to dependency issues!
CentOS is only good enough if he doesn't want the latest and greatest of
everything! Or if he runs on old hardware.
On Feb 20, 2017 17:21, "Samuel Rakitnič
> Le 2017-02-20 05:47, Fa Be a écrit :
>
> Have you tried to use Fedora Cloud Base images?
> https://alt.fedoraproject.org/cloud/
> It's about 128Mo
>
> You may convert qcow2 image with:
> * sudo apt-get install qemu-kvm
> * qemu-img convert test.qcow2 -O raw disk.img
>
> Here is the howto:
> h
Start Date: 2017-02-13 10:08:02.148870
End Date: 2017-02-20 10:08:02.148870
leigh scott : 4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422917 kmodtool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1424798 xed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1424825
On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 03:50:33PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 11:29:37AM -, Fa Be wrote:
> > It will be very beneficial for people if the Fedora project provides
> > the Minimal CD images of Fedora. It can attract more users to Fedora
> > and is very useful for peopl
> And build your own kernel and compile other applications from source?
> Wouldn't that fragment the system? That might lead to dependency issues!
> CentOS is only good enough if he doesn't want the latest and greatest of
> everything! Or if he runs on old hardware.
>
Almost all is available for
Hello Fedora devs!
Today I deployed Bodhi 2.4.0 to production. It's got a few new features
and some bug fixes. You can read the release notes here:
https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/blob/2.4.0/docs/release_notes.rst#240
If you find issues with Bodhi, please let us know!
https://github.com/f
Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Sun, 2017-02-19 at 13:57 +0200, Catalin wrote:
>> - can you see multiple detections of Krita and Rhythmbox?
>
> Please file two separate bugs against Krita and Rhythmbox.
Krita provides 1 desktop file per mimetype supported (each with
NoDisplay=true).
This should
Replies inline
On 20.02.2017 04:47, Fa Be wrote:
>> On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 11:29:37AM -, Fa Be wrote: But then you need to
>> add more stuff later, right? Isn't the network install + downloading
>> specifically what you want a better option anyway?
>
> First of all I must say I assum
On Sun, 2017-02-19 at 23:45 +, Personal (open) wrote:
> DVD IS ALSO in Workstation and is routinely given out at events.
That's the live image. When we say 'DVD' we don't just mean 'any ISO
written to a DVD', it has a specific meaning for Fedora (and RH)
images: it's an installer image contai
On Mon, 2017-02-20 at 04:47 +, Fa Be wrote:
> First of all I must say I assume that the Minimal CD of CentOS
> provides the GNOME Desktop like Debian #1 CD
It does not, no.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
ht
Per old thread,
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/D4QXJ5HBCNJJYWHB7SPOQWL57QMMC63O/
kde-sig retired kdebindings (virtual package), and orphaned the following
today:
kimono
ruby-korundum
ruby-qt
smokeqt
smokekde
qyoto
-- Rex
__
Allright everybody, thanks for your response, I became convinced that there is
no need to Minimal CD of Fedoa.
I understand that if a system is so old that does not have USB port, Fedora in
not siutable for it, and must try CentOS or something lighter and LEGACY!, and
1.3GB for DVD is not too m
On Mon, 2017-02-20 at 09:21 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Krita provides 1 desktop file per mimetype supported (each with
> NoDisplay=true).
>
> This should be a valid use-case as far as I can tell, so isn't a
> krita bug.
Ah yeah, that's interesting. Rhythmbox does too. Looks like I
incorrectly as
> On Mon, 2017-02-20 at 04:47 +, Fa Be wrote:
>
> It does not, no.
Why? Do you know how Debian can do it and what is differences between CentOS
and Debian in the field of default software?
I can guess some:
SELinux, Installer
___
devel mailing lis
On Mon, 2017-02-20 at 17:02 +, Fa Be wrote:
> > On Mon, 2017-02-20 at 04:47 +, Fa Be wrote:
> >
> > It does not, no.
>
> Why? Do you know how Debian can do it and what is differences between
> CentOS and Debian in the field of default software?
>
> I can guess some:
>
> SELinux, Install
El lun, 20-02-2017 a las 08:10 -0800, Adam Williamson escribió:
> On Sun, 2017-02-19 at 23:45 +, Personal (open) wrote:
> > DVD IS ALSO in Workstation and is routinely given out at events.
>
> That's the live image. When we say 'DVD' we don't just mean 'any ISO
> written to a DVD', it has a s
On Mon, 2017-02-20 at 11:31 -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> El lun, 20-02-2017 a las 08:10 -0800, Adam Williamson escribió:
> > On Sun, 2017-02-19 at 23:45 +, Personal (open) wrote:
> > > DVD IS ALSO in Workstation and is routinely given out at events.
> >
> > That's the live image. When we sa
On Seg, 2017-02-20 at 10:39 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Per old thread,
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproje
> ct.org/thread/D4QXJ5HBCNJJYWHB7SPOQWL57QMMC63O/
>
> kde-sig retired kdebindings (virtual package), and orphaned the
> following
> today:
>
> kimono
> r
= Proposed System Wide Change: No More Alphas =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NoMoreAlpha
Change owner(s):
* Dennis Gilmore
* Adam Williamson
Fedora will no longer produce Alpha releases.
== Detailed Description ==
By gating Rawhide builds from landing in the compose and gating the
p
Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Seg, 2017-02-20 at 10:39 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
>> Per old thread,
>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproje
>> ct.org/thread/D4QXJ5HBCNJJYWHB7SPOQWL57QMMC63O/
>>
>> kde-sig retired kdebindings (virtual package), and orphaned the
>> follow
On 02/20/2017 06:44 PM, Jan Kurik wrote:
= Proposed System Wide Change: No More Alphas =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NoMoreAlpha
Change owner(s):
* Dennis Gilmore
* Adam Williamson
Fedora will no longer produce Alpha releases.
-1 from me. This plan is not applicable and will kill
Hey.
I'm looking volunteers for maintaining xml-security-c package in
Fedora. Current version is old in our repos and for example esteid
(Estonian ID card) packages depend on newer xml-security-c (with
openssl 1.1 support). I've already contacted anttix who is current
package administrator to
Just my 2 cents
A minimal fedora iso with @base and @core packages can the tool for a
advanced user to build it own fedora experience on top a minimal install.
If I want just lightdm and i3, openbox, awesome etc a minimal installable
fedora iso than do not requiere internet access at install time
I hope some problems will be fixed into the new Fedora 26
1.
I think is the script from Nautilus who find the software ...
I can fill a bug report because I'm not into development team.
I show you just to see if is a common error.
Also some label test need to be changed from "Open With Other Applic
El lun, 20-02-2017 a las 19:13 +0100, Ralf Corsepius escribió:
> On 02/20/2017 06:44 PM, Jan Kurik wrote:
> > = Proposed System Wide Change: No More Alphas =
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NoMoreAlpha
> >
> > Change owner(s):
> > * Dennis Gilmore
> > * Adam Williamson
> >
> > Fedora
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 11:15 AM William Moreno
wrote:
> Just my 2 cents
>
> A minimal fedora iso with @base and @core packages can the tool for a
> advanced user to build it own fedora experience on top a minimal install.
>
> If I want just lightdm and i3, openbox, awesome etc a minimal installa
I'm stumped here. efl builds against all rawhide arches except aarch64,
where it has started failing like this (since gcc 7):
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/2376/17972376/build.log
libtool: link: gcc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security
-Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -
Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> I do not get what you mean by your statement, it is extremely vague
> with no detail. can you please expand on it in the context of the
> change? and the changes it will bring to the entire workflow of
> rawhide?
Rawhide is just nowhere near working, half the packages have
On 02/20/2017 08:47 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
El lun, 20-02-2017 a las 19:13 +0100, Ralf Corsepius escribió:
On 02/20/2017 06:44 PM, Jan Kurik wrote:
= Proposed System Wide Change: No More Alphas =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NoMoreAlpha
Change owner(s):
* Dennis Gilmore
* Adam Wil
On Mon, 2017-02-20 at 16:51 -0500, Tom Callaway wrote:
> Segmentation fault (core dumped)
> make[4]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs
>
> Any gcc gurus have any thoughts? I don't have an aarch64 setup, but
> even
> if I did, this isn't much to go on.
I would ask the systems team for help with
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 5:20 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>> I do not get what you mean by your statement, it is extremely vague
>> with no detail. can you please expand on it in the context of the
>> change? and the changes it will bring to the entire workflow of
>> rawhide?
>
On 02/20/2017 03:09 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Mon, 2017-02-20 at 16:51 -0500, Tom Callaway wrote:
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
make[4]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs
Any gcc gurus have any thoughts? I don't have an aarch64 setup, but
even
if I did, this isn't much to go on.
I
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 6:42 PM Ralf Corsepius
>
> No. Mr. Williamson's attitude towards the Fedora community makes it
> impossible to answer
Without details, a vague discussion adds nothing meaningful to the
conversation.
Rahul
___
devel mailing list
On Mon, 20 Feb 2017 18:24:21 -0500
Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 5:20 PM, Kevin Kofler
> wrote:
> > Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> >> I do not get what you mean by your statement, it is extremely vague
> >> with no detail. can you please expand on it in the context of the
> >> change? a
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 3:26 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> I also wonder if we're thinking about this problem all wrong. What if
> the answer isn't to increase the friction in Rawhide, but instead to
> create a regular output stream that people can use to be above
> releases? That's more or less how Tum
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 4:11 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Anyhow, I am in favor of the proposal.
>
Yes, so am I, at least until Atomic Workstation has a full GNOME desktop,
Firefox and Virtual Machine Manager ;-).
--
How many people can stand on the shoulders of a giant before the giant
collapses?
On Mon, 2017-02-20 at 18:24 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> I for one don't actually want Rawhide to be gated because it makes
> things much harder in terms of properly developing new features. We're
> simply not capable of being as good as OpenSUSE in terms of automation
> to be able to pull off the fe
On Tue, 21 Feb 2017 00:14:56 +
"M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" wrote:
...snip...
>
> Rawhide as it currently exists can't stay solid enough for me even
> with just the few pieces I absolutely need. Tumbleweed, for all it's
> promise of "latest and greatest", is not supported by enough third
> parti
On 02/21/2017 01:48 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Tue, 21 Feb 2017 00:14:56 +
"M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" wrote:
...snip...
Rawhide as it currently exists can't stay solid enough for me even
with just the few pieces I absolutely need. Tumbleweed, for all it's
promise of "latest and greatest", is
On Tue, 2017-02-21 at 01:56 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 02/21/2017 01:48 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Tue, 21 Feb 2017 00:14:56 +
> > "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" wrote:
> > ...snip...
> >
> > >
> > > Rawhide as it currently exists can't stay solid enough for me even
> > > with just the f
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 7:24 PM, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-02-20 at 18:24 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
>> I for one don't actually want Rawhide to be gated because it makes
>> things much harder in terms of properly developing new features. We're
>> simply not capable of being as good as O
On Mon, 2017-02-20 at 20:49 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 7:24 PM, Adam Williamson
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2017-02-20 at 18:24 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > I for one don't actually want Rawhide to be gated because it makes
> > > things much harder in terms of properly developin
El mar, 21-02-2017 a las 01:56 +0100, Ralf Corsepius escribió:
> On 02/21/2017 01:48 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Tue, 21 Feb 2017 00:14:56 +
> > "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" wrote:
> > ...snip...
> >
> > >
> > > Rawhide as it currently exists can't stay solid enough for me
> > > even
> > > wit
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 4:50 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Feb 2017 00:14:56 +
> "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" wrote:
> ...snip...
>
> >
> > Rawhide as it currently exists can't stay solid enough for me even
> > with just the few pieces I absolutely need. Tumbleweed, for all it's
> > promise
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 6:36 PM M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
wrote:
> It's been a while since I went through the exercise. For a while the
> Workstation Live media wasn't building and the GNOME desktop wasn't
> installing from the netinstall because LibreOffice wasn't working. More
> recently I hit som
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
Modularity WG on 2017-02-21 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 UTC
At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net
The meeting will be about:
Meeting for the Modularity Working Group.
More information available at: [Modularity Working Group wiki
page](https://
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 05:09:55PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Feb 2017 18:24:21 -0500
> Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 5:20 PM, Kevin Kofler
> > wrote:
> > > Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > >> I do not get what you mean by your statement, it is extremely vague
> > >> wit
On Tue, 2017-02-21 at 03:49 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 05:09:55PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Mon, 20 Feb 2017 18:24:21 -0500
> > Neal Gompa wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 5:20 PM, Kevin Kofler
> > > wrote:
> > > > Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>
On Monday, February 20, 2017 6:44:50 PM CET Jan Kurik wrote:
> Fedora will no longer produce Alpha releases.
As a side-effect of making rawhide "alpha". That doesn't sound bad.
After seeing Denis's talk on devconf, I think I understand the motivation:
it takes ages to generate all the Fedora rel
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 05:48:58PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Feb 2017 00:14:56 +
> "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" wrote:
> ...snip...
>
> >
> > Rawhide as it currently exists can't stay solid enough for me even
> > with just the few pieces I absolutely need. Tumbleweed, for all it's
>
Missing expected images:
Atomic qcow2 x86_64
Server dvd i386
Workstation live i386
Kde live x86_64
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Server boot i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Workstation live x86_64
Kde live i386
Failed openQA tests: 11/85 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 57160 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_rep
On Tue, 2017-02-21 at 07:43 +0100, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> On Monday, February 20, 2017 6:44:50 PM CET Jan Kurik wrote:
> > Fedora will no longer produce Alpha releases.
>
> As a side-effect of making rawhide "alpha". That doesn't sound bad.
>
> After seeing Denis's talk on devconf, I think I und
63 matches
Mail list logo
