On Tue, 2017-02-21 at 01:56 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 02/21/2017 01:48 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Tue, 21 Feb 2017 00:14:56 +0000 > > "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <zn...@znmeb.net> wrote: > > ...snip... > > > > > > > > Rawhide as it currently exists can't stay solid enough for me even > > > with just the few pieces I absolutely need. Tumbleweed, for all it's > > > promise of "latest and greatest", is not supported by enough third > > > parties to be useful even as just a host. And sid is, well, sid. > > > > I'm curious what issues you hit with Rawhide? Have any examples? > > Current rawhide (== Feb 15) does not match with what the builders use. > => It's impossible to locally investigate runtime bugs
[adamw@adam productmd (parse-cid)]$ cat /etc/yum.repos.d/koji.repo [koji] name=koji baseurl=http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/repos/rawhide/latest/x86_64/ cost=2000 enabled=1 Please don't do this as a matter of course, because kojipkgs only has so much capacity. But when composes are failing, you can do this to get the latest packages. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
