W dniu 10.07.2016 o 18:00, Sayan Chowdhury pisze:
> I recently packaged and pushed an update for
> fedmsg-meta-fedora-infrastructure to bodhi and exactly 40 secs[1]
> later I got a +1 to the update. I am sure that testing a package
> surely takes more than 40 secs. This makes me really curious tha
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 12:26 PM, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 9:37 AM, Raphael Groner
> wrote:
>
>> Why is it possible to give +1 to stable packages? Bodhi may deny or at least
>> impede such actions, -1 or neutral comments should be still possible though
>> for users hav
Hello,
my name is Roman Vais and I am a new intern in the Java component
maintenance team
at Red Hat in Brno, Czech Republic. I'm 23, student at the Faculty of
Information Technologies
at Brno technical university. I am apologize for that my introduction comes
with tiny delay.
Looking forward to wo
jplesnik changed mmaslano's 'commit' permission on perl-Test-Unit-Lite (f23) to
'Obsolete'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Test-Unit-Lite/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.
> Any kind of feedback after package gets into updates repository should
> be denied, I can't think of a case where package moves to updates
> repository and bodhi still allows to add comments/karma. Any feedback
> after that can be either reported in bugzilla or to the package
> maintainers direct
> W dniu 10.07.2016 o 18:00, Sayan Chowdhury pisze:
>
>
> What about situation when maintainer X scratch built package Y, got it
> tested by few people (let name them A, C, E, F) before submitting it to
> stable-updates?
>
> Once package enters stable-updates A, C, E, F give +1 to package as it
On 07/11/2016 10:49 AM, Kamil Paral wrote:
>> Any kind of feedback after package gets into updates repository should
>> be denied, I can't think of a case where package moves to updates
>> repository and bodhi still allows to add comments/karma. Any feedback
>> after that can be either reported i
On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 08:59:54 -
"Raphael Groner" wrote:
> > W dniu 10.07.2016 o 18:00, Sayan Chowdhury pisze:
> >
> >
> > What about situation when maintainer X scratch built package Y, got
> > it tested by few people (let name them A, C, E, F) before
> > submitting it to stable-updates?
> >
Hello,
as a new Fedora Infrastructure apprentice, I am currently working on this
first infrastructure ticket
https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/3748.
Basically, I updated an old script that collects stats on packages reviews
present on Bugzilla. I wonder if this information cou
On 07/11/2016 11:18 AM, Michal Novotny wrote:
> Hello,
>
> as a new Fedora Infrastructure apprentice, I am currently working on
> this first infrastructure ticket
> https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/3748.
>
> Basically, I updated an old script that collects stats on packages
>
W dniu 11.07.2016 o 10:59, Raphael Groner pisze:
>> W dniu 10.07.2016 o 18:00, Sayan Chowdhury pisze:
>>
>>
>> What about situation when maintainer X scratch built package Y, got
>> it tested by few people (let name them A, C, E, F) before
>> submitting it to stable-updates?
>>
>> Once package e
For me would be better some page with stats/links to weekly status,
monthly status, yearly status and some nice graphics ;)
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Michal Novotny wrote:
> Hello,
>
> as a new Fedora Infrastructure apprentice, I am currently working on this
> first infrastructure ticket
jplesnik changed mmaslano's 'commit' permission on perl-WWW-Mechanize-GZip
(f24) to 'Obsolete'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-WWW-Mechanize-GZip/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedora
> On 07/11/2016 10:49 AM, Kamil Paral wrote:
> >> Any kind of feedback after package gets into updates repository should
> >> be denied, I can't think of a case where package moves to updates
> >> repository and bodhi still allows to add comments/karma. Any feedback
> >> after that can be either re
jplesnik changed mmaslano's 'watchbugzilla' permission on perl-aliased (f23) to
'Obsolete'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-aliased/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
htt
jplesnik changed mmaslano's 'commit' permission on perl-aliased (f23) to
'Obsolete'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-aliased/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://li
Today at 23:59 UTC.we are closing the nomination window for the
July-2016 FESCo/Council elections. This is the last chance to nominate
people to these two important groups.
For FESCo we have opened four seats:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Development/SteeringCommittee/Nominations
For Council we
jplesnik changed mmaslano's 'watchbugzilla' permission on perl-criticism (f23)
to 'Obsolete'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-criticism/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 07/11/2016 10:35 AM, Roman Vais wrote:
> Hello,
> my name is Roman Vais and I am a new intern in the Java component
> maintenance team
> at Red Hat in Brno, Czech Republic. I'm 23, student at the Faculty of
> Information Technologies
> at Brno technical university. I am apologize for that my int
> One of my laptops has quiet and no rhgb in the grub line, so no pretty UI.
> As I wasn't paying attention, I used the fedup commands (download, reboot),
> which got routed to dnf. Upon reboot, the on-screen output showed a partial
> boot (from systemd messages) and no indication that an upgrade
jplesnik changed mmaslano's 'watchbugzilla' permission on perl-pmtools (f23) to
'Obsolete'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-pmtools/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
htt
- Original Message -
> On 07/08/16 20:41, Bastien Nocera-san wrote:
> > I think that the emoji input method should be a separate input method, so
> > that most users would have the choice between inputting using the keyboard
> > layout that matches their keyboard, and a separate input met
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20160710.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20160711.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 6
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 35
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0.00 B
Size of dropped packages:0.00 B
- Original Message -
> > On 07/09/2016 12:04 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> >>> In older Fedora (at least Fedora 22) I could easily mount my ihphone
> >>> in Nautilus. I could click on it in the left hand side of the File
> >>> Manager and it would mount.
> >>>
> >>> I am having trouble gett
Missing expected images:
Kde live i386
Server dvd i386
Server boot x86_64
Server dvd x86_64
Kde live x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Server boot i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Kde raw-xz armhfp
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Failed openQA tests: 2/7 (x86_64)
ID: 25142 Test: x86_64
Dne 11.7.2016 v 11:00 Christian Dersch napsal(a):
>
> On 07/11/2016 10:49 AM, Kamil Paral wrote:
>>> Any kind of feedback after package gets into updates repository should
>>> be denied, I can't think of a case where package moves to updates
>>> repository and bodhi still allows to add comments/k
Hello,
I'm trying to compile the latest version of Warzone2100 on rawhide,
but I'm getting this error:
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -DYY_NO_INPUT -D_REENTRANT
-I/usr/include/SDL2 -I/usr/include/libpng16 -I/usr/include/AL
-D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS -DNDEBUG
-DWZ_DATADIR="\"/u
On 11/07/16 13:09, Jan Synacek wrote:
In file included from ../lib/framework/frame.h:44:0,
from ../lib/framework/wzapp.h:24,
from frontend.cpp:27:
frontend.cpp: In function 'void startCampaignSelector()':
../lib/framework/string_ext.h:178:74: error: format not a
On 11/07/16 14:09 +0200, Jan Synacek wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to compile the latest version of Warzone2100 on rawhide,
but I'm getting this error:
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -DYY_NO_INPUT -D_REENTRANT
-I/usr/include/SDL2 -I/usr/include/libpng16 -I/usr/include/AL
-D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -D_
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 02:09:24PM +0200, Jan Synacek wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to compile the latest version of Warzone2100 on rawhide,
> but I'm getting this error:
>
> g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -DYY_NO_INPUT -D_REENTRANT
> -I/usr/include/SDL2 -I/usr/include/libpng16 -I/usr/include/
On 11/07/16 13:16 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 02:09:24PM +0200, Jan Synacek wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to compile the latest version of Warzone2100 on rawhide,
but I'm getting this error:
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -DYY_NO_INPUT -D_REENTRANT
-I/usr/include/SDL2 -
On 11/07/16 13:22 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 11/07/16 13:16 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 02:09:24PM +0200, Jan Synacek wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to compile the latest version of Warzone2100 on rawhide,
but I'm getting this error:
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I..
On 11/07/16 13:27 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 11/07/16 13:22 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Looks like it's coming from here:
https://github.com/Warzone2100/warzone2100/blob/master/src/frontend.cpp#L381
No check that list.size() <= 10 to prevent overflowing the hacklist
buffer ... eurgh, I
On 07/11/16 20:25, Bastien Nocera-san wrote:
- Original Message -
On 07/08/16 20:41, Bastien Nocera-san wrote:
I think that the emoji input method should be a separate input method, so
that most users would have the choice between inputting using the keyboard
layout that matches their
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 2:19 PM, Kamil Paral wrote:
>> Any kind of feedback after package gets into updates repository should
>> be denied, I can't think of a case where package moves to updates
>> repository and bodhi still allows to add comments/karma. Any feedback
>> after that can be eith
Can that information be used to award badges? There's an old open issue to
implement badges for doing package reviews. Maybe get in contact with the
badges team.
https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-badges/ticket/101
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/a
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 3:18 PM, Raphael Groner
wrote:
> Can that information be used to award badges? There's an old open issue to
> implement badges for doing package reviews. Maybe get in contact with the
> badges team.
> https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-badges/ticket/101
whoa! would be happy
Change in package status over the last 168 hours
5 packages were orphaned
msp430-binutils [f23, f22, el6, master, f24] was orphaned by rspanton
Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at msp430
https://admin.fedorapr
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 3:18 PM, Raphael Groner
wrote:
> Can that information be used to award badges? There's an old open issue to
> implement badges for doing package reviews. Maybe get in contact with the
> badges team.
> https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-badges/ticket/101
This is a nice idea
On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 9:00 AM, Sayan Chowdhury <
sayan.chowdhury2...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> After going through messages in datagrepper[2][3], I found that few people
> are
> giving out karma in one go (4-5 packages under a minute). If these packages
> really are not-tested and the karma are give
First, have you contacted them? This looks like a misunderstanding between the
way you (and probably most fedora packagers + bodhi developers) think "karma"
works and the way they understand it.
My perspective is being someone who often tests packages but doesn't package
them.
From my point of
I can confirm this issue. I've already reported this as an issue to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1317195 4 months ago, but nothing
happened. There is no indication that one should use upstream (github.com) to
report bugs instead of RedHat Bugzilla. Please don't expect users to rep
On 07/11/2016 05:11 PM, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
> Regarding the comment regarding karma left 40 seconds after the package
> was pushed... it could
> be that the person earlier had downloaded the package directly from
> koji, because they did not
> want to wait DAYS for the package to be pushed to the
Personally I prefer to track issues in github as if something in
bugzilla I probably will never notice or not able to find.
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 5:24 PM, Christian Stadelmann
wrote:
> I can confirm this issue. I've already reported this as an issue to
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.c
On Mon, 2016-07-11 at 15:12 +, Christian Stadelmann wrote:
> First, have you contacted them? This looks like a misunderstanding
> between the way you (and probably most fedora packagers + bodhi
> developers) think "karma" works and the way they understand it.
>
> My perspective is being someon
On Mon, 2016-07-11 at 06:37 +, Raphael Groner wrote:
> I got karma on packages that were in stable already for a long time. The
> karma system is too tolerant in my eyes.
>
> Why is it possible to give +1 to stable packages? Bodhi may deny or at least
> impede such actions, -1 or neutral com
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 8:31 AM, Till Hofmann
wrote:
> IMHO that's a strong reason against a freeze on giving karma until the
> package has been in testing for a certain amount of time. In fact, I
> sometimes give +1 on updates that haven't been pushed at all yet. One
> example [1]: I reported a
Adam Williamson writes:
> "Install the package and see if the system breaks" is an appropriate
> form of testing for some packages, but not all, many are not at all
> related to typical desktop system functionality. Folks do need to make
> sure they understand what a package is for and have actua
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 10:19 AM, Dave Love wrote:
> I didn't realize that this automation actually got things pushed rather
> than simply marked as able to be pushed. That's likely documented,
> though I haven't had time to check the documentation, and presumably
> it's my fault. However, I gu
On Mon, 2016-07-11 at 11:43 +, Fedora compose checker wrote:
> Missing expected images:
>
> Kde live i386
> Server dvd i386
> Server boot x86_64
> Server dvd x86_64
> Kde live x86_64
> Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64
> Cloud_base raw-xz i386
> Server boot i386
> Atomic raw-xz x86_64
> Kde raw-xz armh
On 07/11/2016 07:33 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
>>> On 07/09/2016 12:04 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> In older Fedora (at least Fedora 22) I could easily mount my ihphone
> in Nautilus. I could click on it in the left hand side of the File
> Manager an
On Monday, July 11, 2016 11:38:18 AM CDT Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-07-11 at 11:43 +, Fedora compose checker wrote:
> > Missing expected images:
> >
> > Kde live i386
> > Server dvd i386
> > Server boot x86_64
> > Server dvd x86_64
> > Kde live x86_64
> > Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64
>
The Nomination period of Elections to Council and FESCo is now over.
The list of nominees follows:
== Council (1 open seat) ==
* Justin Flory (jflory7)
* Langdon White (langdon)
== FESCo (4 open seats) ==
* Josh Boyer (jwb/jwboyer)
* Stephen Gallagher (sgallagh)
* Haikel Guemar (number80/hguemar)
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 3:00 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> For me would be better some page with stats/links to weekly status,
> monthly status, yearly status and some nice graphics ;)
>
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Michal Novotny wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> as a new Fedora Infrastructure app
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
Modularity WG on 2016-07-12 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 UTC
At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net
The meeting will be about:
Meeting for the Modularity Working Group.
More information available at: [Modularity Working Group wiki
page](https://
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 7:05 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 3:18 PM, Raphael Groner
> wrote:
>> Can that information be used to award badges? There's an old open issue to
>> implement badges for doing package reviews. Maybe get in contact with the
>> badges team.
>> htt
On 11 July 2016 at 16:55, Bastien Nocera wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > On 07/08/16 20:41, Bastien Nocera-san wrote:
> > > I think that the emoji input method should be a separate input method,
> so
> > > that most users would have the choice between inputting using the
> keyboard
Takao Fujiwara さんはかきました:
> On 07/11/16 20:25, Bastien Nocera-san wrote:
that most users would have the choice between inputting using the keyboard
layout that matches their keyboard, and a separate input method for
emojis.
>>>
>>> I think the emoji typing does not depend on XKB but
>
> Yes , it does. Now let me put forward the actual idea of having an QA
> sprints succeeding an onboarding call. As Adam mentioned we have many new
> contributors coming in and hence there was a need to ensure that the
> packages are being tested correctly . Over a span of 2+ weeks the new
> cont
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 11:22 AM, Buvanesh Kumar wrote:
> Hi Sayan,
> I have tested your package and verified it in Fedora 24 release. It works
> fine. Thanks for pushing it to bodhi for testing. Since there was no test
> case, I just installed it but after careful evaluation, I installed Fedor
60 matches
Mail list logo
