Dne 11.7.2016 v 11:00 Christian Dersch napsal(a): > > On 07/11/2016 10:49 AM, Kamil Paral wrote: >>> Any kind of feedback after package gets into updates repository should >>> be denied, I can't think of a case where package moves to updates >>> repository and bodhi still allows to add comments/karma. Any feedback >>> after that can be either reported in bugzilla or to the package >>> maintainers directly. Its not like providing positive or negative >>> karma will make any changes to already pushed package to updates >>> repository. >> I do have valid use cases. We've had examples of important packages having >> been pushed stable too quickly and breaking some computers (think kernel, >> mesa). The bodhi comments can then be used to provide a description of the >> problem, suggest any workarounds or fixes, and also link to more information >> e.g. in the bugzilla or common bugs wiki, etc. The Bodhi pages are easy to >> find (if I perform a system update and the computer breaks, I look at what >> was included in the last update, and look at any bodhi feedback for those >> packages), so it makes perfect sense to inform people there. It's much >> harder to search bugzilla to find issues with a particular package. >> > Well, IMHO for description of the problem and fixes Bugzilla is the > right place. It's a bug in a stable package then, no testing feedback > anymore.
But I think it is good feedback loop for testers. I would like to know about package, which I approved, but later it was discovered, that something was wrong with it. I might do better job testing next time (since I probably won't notice new BZ). Vít -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
